Skip to content

test(ffe): use canonical FFE fixtures - #8616

Draft
leoromanovsky wants to merge 9 commits into
masterfrom
leo.romanovsky/ffe-canonical-fixtures-20260512
Draft

test(ffe): use canonical FFE fixtures#8616
leoromanovsky wants to merge 9 commits into
masterfrom
leo.romanovsky/ffe-canonical-fixtures-20260512

Conversation

@leoromanovsky

@leoromanovsky leoromanovsky commented May 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Motivation

Use the shared FFE fixture corpus. This prevents copied .NET fixtures from drifting from other SDKs.

The same migration is merged in Java and libdatadog. The Go migration is approved. Related migrations are open for Python, JavaScript, and Ruby.

Changes and Decisions

  • Add DataDog/ffe-system-test-data as a submodule under the feature-flag tests.
  • Remove copied fixtures and load canonical configuration and evaluation cases.
  • Parse flags independently so malformed flags do not reject valid neighbors.
  • Return FLAG_NOT_FOUND for missing flags and classify temporal, static, and split allocations.
  • Assert canonical values and reasons.
  • Initialize submodules in the shared Azure checkout template and configure weekly Dependabot updates.

@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot Bot commented May 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (8616) and master.

✅ No regressions detected - check the details below

Full Metrics Comparison

FakeDbCommand

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration72.35 ± (72.51 - 73.06) ms70.98 ± (71.07 - 71.44) ms-1.9%
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration78.79 ± (78.59 - 79.08) ms75.50 ± (75.30 - 75.68) ms-4.2%
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1101.75 ± (1102.48 - 1111.11) ms1090.56 ± (1091.03 - 1098.97) ms-1.0%
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms22.53 ± (22.48 - 22.59) ms22.05 ± (22.00 - 22.09) ms-2.2%
process.time_to_main_ms85.54 ± (85.27 - 85.81) ms81.26 ± (81.09 - 81.43) ms-5.0%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.02 ± (11.01 - 11.02) MB11.01 ± (11.00 - 11.01) MB-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count12 ± (12 - 12)12 ± (12 - 12)+0.0%
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms22.16 ± (22.13 - 22.19) ms22.05 ± (22.02 - 22.08) ms-0.5%
process.time_to_main_ms83.84 ± (83.66 - 84.02) ms82.41 ± (82.24 - 82.58) ms-1.7%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.05 ± (11.05 - 11.05) MB11.05 ± (11.05 - 11.05) MB-0.0%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count13 ± (13 - 13)13 ± (13 - 13)+0.0%
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms210.40 ± (209.46 - 211.35) ms211.74 ± (210.86 - 212.63) ms+0.6%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms540.87 ± (539.47 - 542.27) ms539.56 ± (538.22 - 540.90) ms-0.2%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed49.56 ± (49.53 - 49.60) MB49.57 ± (49.54 - 49.61) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)+0.0%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms21.01 ± (20.98 - 21.05) ms20.77 ± (20.75 - 20.80) ms-1.1%
process.time_to_main_ms72.73 ± (72.48 - 72.98) ms71.25 ± (71.10 - 71.41) ms-2.0%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.74 ± (10.74 - 10.74) MB10.73 ± (10.73 - 10.74) MB-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms20.90 ± (20.87 - 20.93) ms21.01 ± (20.97 - 21.05) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms72.58 ± (72.43 - 72.73) ms74.80 ± (74.56 - 75.04) ms+3.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.86 ± (10.85 - 10.86) MB10.85 ± (10.85 - 10.85) MB-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms370.63 ± (368.56 - 372.71) ms371.24 ± (369.27 - 373.21) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms546.05 ± (544.87 - 547.23) ms544.62 ± (543.54 - 545.70) ms-0.3%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed50.67 ± (50.65 - 50.69) MB50.66 ± (50.63 - 50.68) MB-0.0%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)-0.4%
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms19.38 ± (19.34 - 19.43) ms19.06 ± (19.03 - 19.09) ms-1.7%
process.time_to_main_ms73.13 ± (72.84 - 73.43) ms70.66 ± (70.46 - 70.86) ms-3.4%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.76 ± (7.75 - 7.76) MB7.79 ± (7.79 - 7.80) MB+0.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms19.28 ± (19.24 - 19.31) ms18.96 ± (18.93 - 19.00) ms-1.6%
process.time_to_main_ms74.07 ± (73.83 - 74.30) ms71.38 ± (71.24 - 71.51) ms-3.6%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.82 ± (7.81 - 7.82) MB7.85 ± (7.84 - 7.86) MB+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms297.52 ± (295.38 - 299.67) ms300.70 ± (297.96 - 303.45) ms+1.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms494.78 ± (493.65 - 495.91) ms496.21 ± (495.23 - 497.19) ms+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed38.08 ± (38.05 - 38.11) MB38.05 ± (38.02 - 38.08) MB-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count27 ± (27 - 27)27 ± (27 - 27)+0.4%✅⬆️

HttpMessageHandler

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration213.84 ± (213.80 - 214.72) ms190.79 ± (191.07 - 191.85) ms-10.8%
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration217.76 ± (217.56 - 218.26) ms195.31 ± (195.19 - 195.52) ms-10.3%
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1285.39 ± (1284.58 - 1291.94) ms1165.14 ± (1165.90 - 1171.36) ms-9.4%
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms206.02 ± (205.51 - 206.53) ms184.59 ± (184.29 - 184.89) ms-10.4%
process.time_to_main_ms91.54 ± (91.26 - 91.82) ms80.54 ± (80.37 - 80.71) ms-12.0%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.14 ± (16.12 - 16.15) MB16.36 ± (16.33 - 16.39) MB+1.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)19 ± (19 - 20)-2.8%
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms204.11 ± (203.68 - 204.53) ms183.99 ± (183.74 - 184.25) ms-9.9%
process.time_to_main_ms92.09 ± (91.80 - 92.38) ms81.59 ± (81.51 - 81.67) ms-11.4%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.20 ± (16.18 - 16.22) MB16.38 ± (16.36 - 16.40) MB+1.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count21 ± (21 - 21)21 ± (20 - 21)-1.4%
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms404.94 ± (403.48 - 406.41) ms375.12 ± (374.03 - 376.21) ms-7.4%
process.time_to_main_ms574.71 ± (573.25 - 576.18) ms525.67 ± (524.64 - 526.70) ms-8.5%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed59.85 ± (59.78 - 59.91) MB58.03 ± (57.95 - 58.10) MB-3.0%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)-1.2%
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms212.01 ± (211.52 - 212.51) ms188.85 ± (188.64 - 189.07) ms-10.9%
process.time_to_main_ms81.02 ± (80.71 - 81.34) ms70.59 ± (70.43 - 70.74) ms-12.9%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.44 ± (16.42 - 16.46) MB16.14 ± (15.97 - 16.30) MB-1.9%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (19 - 20)18 ± (18 - 18)-8.2%
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms211.31 ± (210.85 - 211.77) ms187.84 ± (187.69 - 187.99) ms-11.1%
process.time_to_main_ms82.11 ± (81.83 - 82.39) ms71.58 ± (71.53 - 71.63) ms-12.8%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.46 ± (16.44 - 16.48) MB16.07 ± (15.90 - 16.24) MB-2.4%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 21)19 ± (18 - 19)-9.1%
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms581.52 ± (579.12 - 583.92) ms582.66 ± (580.05 - 585.26) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms589.36 ± (588.09 - 590.63) ms532.38 ± (531.61 - 533.16) ms-9.7%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed61.70 ± (61.60 - 61.80) MB61.67 ± (61.61 - 61.73) MB-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count31 ± (31 - 31)31 ± (31 - 31)+0.4%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms212.16 ± (211.69 - 212.64) ms186.71 ± (186.51 - 186.92) ms-12.0%
process.time_to_main_ms79.85 ± (79.60 - 80.10) ms69.99 ± (69.84 - 70.13) ms-12.4%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.80 ± (11.78 - 11.83) MB11.99 ± (11.94 - 12.04) MB+1.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)18 ± (18 - 18)-5.1%
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms211.78 ± (211.30 - 212.26) ms185.98 ± (185.80 - 186.17) ms-12.2%
process.time_to_main_ms81.62 ± (81.40 - 81.84) ms71.08 ± (71.01 - 71.14) ms-12.9%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.77 ± (11.75 - 11.80) MB11.82 ± (11.71 - 11.93) MB+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)18 ± (18 - 19)-7.9%
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms525.53 ± (519.01 - 532.04) ms509.63 ± (506.97 - 512.29) ms-3.0%
process.time_to_main_ms540.99 ± (540.05 - 541.92) ms483.01 ± (482.50 - 483.51) ms-10.7%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed51.45 ± (51.38 - 51.52) MB51.46 ± (51.43 - 51.49) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)29 ± (29 - 29)-2.5%
Comparison explanation

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program, and are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are highlighted in **red**. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

Duration charts
FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8616) - mean (71ms)  : 69, 74
    master - mean (73ms)  : 69, 77

    section Bailout
    This PR (8616) - mean (75ms)  : 74, 77
    master - mean (79ms)  : 75, 82

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8616) - mean (1,095ms)  : 1039, 1151
    master - mean (1,107ms)  : 1045, 1168

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8616) - mean (110ms)  : 107, 113
    master - mean (115ms)  : 109, 122

    section Bailout
    This PR (8616) - mean (111ms)  : 109, 113
    master - mean (113ms)  : 109, 117

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8616) - mean (788ms)  : 767, 810
    master - mean (790ms)  : 770, 810

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8616) - mean (98ms)  : 95, 101
    master - mean (100ms)  : 95, 105

    section Bailout
    This PR (8616) - mean (102ms)  : 98, 107
    master - mean (100ms)  : 97, 102

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8616) - mean (944ms)  : 910, 979
    master - mean (956ms)  : 916, 996

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8616) - mean (97ms)  : 93, 101
    master - mean (100ms)  : 94, 106

    section Bailout
    This PR (8616) - mean (97ms)  : 96, 99
    master - mean (101ms)  : 97, 105

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8616) - mean (827ms)  : 784, 870
    master - mean (823ms)  : 785, 862

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8616) - mean (191ms)  : 188, 195
    master - mean (214ms)  : 209, 220

    section Bailout
    This PR (8616) - mean (195ms)  : 194, 197
    master - mean (218ms)  : 215, 221

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8616) - mean (1,169ms)  : 1130, 1208
    master - mean (1,288ms)  : 1235, 1341

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8616) - mean (274ms)  : 269, 278
    master - mean (308ms)  : 302, 314

    section Bailout
    This PR (8616) - mean (274ms)  : 272, 277
    master - mean (307ms)  : 300, 313

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8616) - mean (941ms)  : 925, 957
    master - mean (1,023ms)  : 1000, 1046

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8616) - mean (268ms)  : 264, 272
    master - mean (303ms)  : 295, 312

    section Bailout
    This PR (8616) - mean (268ms)  : 266, 270
    master - mean (304ms)  : 294, 313

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8616) - mean (1,144ms)  : 1108, 1181
    master - mean (1,214ms)  : 1178, 1251

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8616) - mean (266ms)  : 262, 270
    master - mean (303ms)  : 295, 311

    section Bailout
    This PR (8616) - mean (266ms)  : 263, 269
    master - mean (304ms)  : 297, 312

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8616) - mean (1,024ms)  : 984, 1064
    master - mean (1,110ms)  : 1018, 1201

Loading

@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented May 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-07-30 04:31:16

Comparing candidate commit 5166885 in PR branch leo.romanovsky/ffe-canonical-fixtures-20260512 with baseline commit 7bdf71e in branch master.

📊 Benchmarking dashboard

Found 1 performance improvements and 1 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 69 metrics, 1 unstable metrics, 61 known flaky benchmarks, 65 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartActiveSpan net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+14379.847op/s; +17342.385op/s] or [+5.189%; +6.259%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-4734.468op/s; -4520.155op/s] or [-5.405%; -5.160%]

Unstable benchmarks

These benchmarks have a confidence interval too wide to call a change; treat them as noise rather than signal.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-29.399ms; -8.194ms] or [-14.682%; -4.092%]

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-10027.419op/s; -9583.060op/s] or [-11.890%; -11.363%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0

  • 🟥 throughput [-8832.187op/s; -6200.634op/s] or [-7.424%; -5.212%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 throughput [-10117.228op/s; -8872.007op/s] or [-10.287%; -9.021%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.828ms; +304.706ms] or [+150.274%; +151.206%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-51.024op/s; -47.268op/s] or [-9.180%; -8.504%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+383.022ms; +384.831ms] or [+302.611%; +304.040%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+91.472op/s; +96.554op/s] or [+12.060%; +12.730%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+390.599ms; +393.621ms] or [+345.665%; +348.339%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+4.692KB; +4.693KB] or [+98.785%; +98.801%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-60339.639op/s; -59933.036op/s] or [-46.947%; -46.631%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.816KB; +3.816KB] or [+80.699%; +80.711%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-16.198ms; -12.026ms] or [-7.565%; -5.616%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-59874.311op/s; -57111.971op/s] or [-43.705%; -41.689%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+4.544KB; +4.544KB] or [+98.261%; +98.274%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-48542.498op/s; -46291.727op/s] or [-43.888%; -41.853%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.316KB; +1.316KB] or [+106.475%; +106.490%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-261428.922op/s; -255639.340op/s] or [-26.693%; -26.102%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+479 bytes; +480 bytes] or [+39.212%; +39.221%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-26.573ms; -21.678ms] or [-11.850%; -9.667%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-77017.153op/s; -50970.485op/s] or [-8.228%; -5.445%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.280KB; +1.280KB] or [+105.947%; +105.963%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-154903.605op/s; -138723.924op/s] or [-22.257%; -19.932%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.378KB; +3.378KB] or [+89.003%; +89.017%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-72499.838op/s; -71729.243op/s] or [-48.792%; -48.273%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.336KB; +3.336KB] or [+88.150%; +88.161%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-73259.642op/s; -70373.294op/s] or [-46.614%; -44.777%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.264KB; +3.264KB] or [+88.493%; +88.506%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-56649.408op/s; -54020.072op/s] or [-45.129%; -43.034%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+288191.625op/s; +306092.725op/s] or [+9.610%; +10.206%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-19.124ms; -14.778ms] or [-8.815%; -6.812%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.155ms; +299.997ms] or [+149.478%; +149.898%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.431ms; +303.126ms] or [+151.004%; +152.867%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.858ms; +302.299ms] or [+151.045%; +152.275%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+296.706ms; +297.486ms] or [+145.730%; +146.113%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+293.699ms; +296.147ms] or [+143.579%; +144.775%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.945ms; +299.685ms] or [+148.913%; +149.782%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+23.488µs; +47.097µs] or [+7.499%; +15.036%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-437.698op/s; -239.033op/s] or [-13.644%; -7.451%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.772ms; +300.528ms] or [+149.617%; +149.994%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+410.778ms; +419.738ms] or [+446.327%; +456.063%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+746.753op/s; +929.005op/s] or [+6.136%; +7.634%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+297.627ms; +350.391ms] or [+225.986%; +266.049%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • unstable execution_time [+270.812ms; +348.021ms] or [+124.517%; +160.017%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-570.322op/s; -512.507op/s] or [-51.677%; -46.438%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+210.873ms; +344.119ms] or [+89.865%; +146.649%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-672.482op/s; -588.989op/s] or [-44.855%; -39.286%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+338.025ms; +348.532ms] or [+202.178%; +208.463%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-375.774op/s; -338.602op/s] or [-26.165%; -23.576%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.791ms; +303.461ms] or [+151.976%; +152.817%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.308ms; +302.436ms] or [+150.986%; +151.551%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.932ms; +303.303ms] or [+150.673%; +152.367%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+25613.442op/s; +33781.814op/s] or [+5.395%; +7.116%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.270ms; +301.671ms] or [+150.283%; +151.489%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.270ms; +304.871ms] or [+148.965%; +150.745%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.994ms; +308.056ms] or [+154.077%; +156.136%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.145ms; +305.769ms] or [+152.151%; +153.468%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.882ms; +302.740ms] or [+148.965%; +150.888%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+36745.171op/s; +49096.210op/s] or [+7.296%; +9.749%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.843ms; +303.703ms] or [+149.169%; +151.090%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-15.875ms; -12.211ms] or [-7.382%; -5.678%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

  • unstable execution_time [+14.366µs; +56.585µs] or [+3.548%; +13.977%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-20.012KB; -19.989KB] or [-7.300%; -7.292%]
  • unstable execution_time [-34.905µs; +23.960µs] or [-6.899%; +4.736%]
  • unstable throughput [-80.705op/s; +125.464op/s] or [-4.027%; +6.261%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-19.549KB; -19.530KB] or [-7.126%; -7.119%]
  • unstable execution_time [-50.248µs; +11.411µs] or [-8.708%; +1.977%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+6.118µs; +10.492µs] or [+14.462%; +24.801%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-4770.308op/s; -2915.377op/s] or [-20.081%; -12.273%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-13.168µs; -4.374µs] or [-20.430%; -6.786%]
  • unstable throughput [+1183.253op/s; +3035.487op/s] or [+7.260%; +18.624%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.361ms; +303.658ms] or [+152.830%; +153.486%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.549ms; +304.896ms] or [+153.997%; +155.191%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.258ms; +301.762ms] or [+149.816%; +151.069%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+31239.035op/s; +34852.937op/s] or [+5.913%; +6.597%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.696ms; +301.170ms] or [+148.873%; +150.106%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.371ms; +301.984ms] or [+150.832%; +151.642%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.855ms; +305.086ms] or [+153.589%; +154.720%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.496ms; +300.175ms] or [+149.390%; +149.729%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+61004480.976op/s; +61279807.985op/s] or [+44.427%; +44.628%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+420.166ms; +424.686ms] or [+522.551%; +528.172%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.389ms; +299.438ms] or [+148.829%; +149.353%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+88674.600op/s; +98792.567op/s] or [+8.279%; +9.224%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+85366.357op/s; +114992.833op/s] or [+6.608%; +8.901%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+68484.080op/s; +76844.318op/s] or [+6.802%; +7.632%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+40045.756op/s; +45369.950op/s] or [+7.272%; +8.238%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+24988.090op/s; +34961.196op/s] or [+5.593%; +7.825%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+56376.489op/s; +79889.450op/s] or [+6.299%; +8.926%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

@andrewlock andrewlock left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please don't use git submodules. We'd rather have a job that periodically pulls in the data from other projects if that's the desired approach.

Alternatively, we can use the system-tests approach which clones the other repo and runs tests against it in CI, if that's a possibility

@leoromanovsky leoromanovsky changed the title Use canonical FFE fixtures test(ffe): use canonical FFE fixtures May 13, 2026
@leoromanovsky
leoromanovsky force-pushed the leo.romanovsky/ffe-canonical-fixtures-20260512 branch from 834879c to 280cbd9 Compare July 30, 2026 01:34
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot pushed a commit to DataDog/dd-trace-go that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2026
## Motivation

Use the shared FFE fixture corpus. This prevents copied Go fixtures from drifting from other SDKs.

The same migration is merged in [Java](DataDog/dd-trace-java#11355) and [libdatadog](DataDog/libdatadog#1979). Related migrations are open for [Python](DataDog/dd-trace-py#19390), [JavaScript](DataDog/dd-trace-js#8441), [Ruby](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#5742), and [.NET](DataDog/dd-trace-dotnet#8616).

## Changes and Decisions

- Add `DataDog/ffe-system-test-data` as an OpenFeature test submodule.
- Read all canonical configuration and evaluation cases from the submodule.
- Parse and validate flags independently so one invalid flag does not reject valid neighbors.
- Assert canonical values and reasons, including temporal defaults and missing-flag errors.
- Initialize submodules in Go test workflows and configure weekly Dependabot updates.

Co-authored-by: leo.romanovsky <leo.romanovsky@datadoghq.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants