[CI] Fix BuggyBits port-binding TOCTOU race in profiler integration tests

[datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2]

Summary

Fixes a TOCTOU (Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use) race condition in Samples.BuggyBits that causes intermittent System.IO.IOException: Failed to bind to address … address already in use failures in profiler integration tests.

Root cause

TestApplicationRunner.BuildTestCommandLine calls TcpPortProvider.GetOpenPort() to find a free port, then passes it as --urls http://localhost:{port} to the BuggyBits process. Inside BuggyBits, CreateHostBuilder(args) builds the host immediately using those args — Kestrel reads --urls and binds the port at that point.

The existing GetValidPort call in Program.Main then probes whether the port is free — but this happens after the host is already built with the original port. The probe result only updates rootUrl for SelfInvoker; Kestrel never sees the corrected port. The "race avoidance" code was therefore a no-op for the actual bind failure.

On a busy CI runner (10+ containers: ElasticMQ, Localstack, Postgres, Kafka, RabbitMQ, MsSQL, MySQL, etc.) the window between TcpPortProvider's probe and Kestrel's bind is wide enough for another process to grab the port.

Fix

Move the URL/port resolution before CreateHostBuilder(args):

1. ResolveListenUrl: extracts --urls from args, calls FindFreePortUrl (up to 5 retries with fresh ephemeral ports), returns updated args and the resolved URL.
2. FindFreePortUrl: probes port availability, retries with OS-assigned ephemeral ports on failure.
3. IsPortAvailable: atomic HttpListener probe (extracted from the old GetValidPort).
4. ReplaceUrlInArgs: patches the --urls value in args so CreateHostBuilder configures Kestrel with the correct port.
5. The dead post-build port-probe block is removed.

GetOpenPort is unchanged — it is used by other tests.

Fixes recurring CI failures on commits: 1be7d52e, dc3f873a, ba7828b5, fb4364172, 169fbf4d.

[bouwkast]

#8620

[pr-commenter]

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-05-28 16:00:02

Comparing candidate commit 9617f6f in PR branch saturn/fix-buggybits-port-race with baseline commit 9617f6f in branch master.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 72 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 61 known flaky benchmarks, 65 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

• 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
• 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

• 🟥 throughput [-5624.589op/s; -5212.901op/s] or [-6.669%; -6.181%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 throughput [-8034.104op/s; -6678.349op/s] or [-8.169%; -6.790%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+310.942ms; +318.750ms] or [+154.301%; +158.175%]
• 🟥 throughput [-43.312op/s; -39.638op/s] or [-7.793%; -7.132%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+381.437ms; +383.718ms] or [+301.359%; +303.161%]
• 🟩 throughput [+88.167op/s; +91.968op/s] or [+11.624%; +12.126%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+394.124ms; +398.364ms] or [+348.785%; +352.537%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.308KB; +1.308KB] or [+27.528%; +27.540%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+9.976%; +9.987%]
• 🟩 execution_time [-15.684ms; -11.512ms] or [-7.325%; -5.376%]
• 🟩 throughput [+6856.750op/s; +9634.172op/s] or [+5.005%; +7.032%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+27.500%; +27.510%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.307KB; +1.307KB] or [+105.743%; +105.758%]
• 🟥 throughput [-272971.392op/s; -263870.231op/s] or [-27.872%; -26.942%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+38.557%; +38.566%]
• 🟩 execution_time [-26.616ms; -21.722ms] or [-11.870%; -9.687%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+105.288%; +105.304%]
• 🟥 throughput [-154759.446op/s; -138984.087op/s] or [-22.236%; -19.969%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

• 🟩 throughput [+8774.404op/s; +11702.331op/s] or [+5.583%; +7.446%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 throughput [+8782.838op/s; +11542.887op/s] or [+6.997%; +9.195%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

• 🟩 throughput [+463007.159op/s; +488340.687op/s] or [+15.439%; +16.283%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 execution_time [-18.770ms; -14.441ms] or [-8.652%; -6.657%]
• 🟩 throughput [+150001.718op/s; +210392.874op/s] or [+5.954%; +8.351%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+299.169ms; +300.570ms] or [+149.485%; +150.184%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+299.507ms; +302.737ms] or [+151.042%; +152.671%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+300.169ms; +302.729ms] or [+151.202%; +152.491%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+296.703ms; +297.407ms] or [+145.729%; +146.075%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+293.442ms; +295.993ms] or [+143.453%; +144.700%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+298.246ms; +299.981ms] or [+149.063%; +149.930%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+23.755µs; +47.534µs] or [+7.584%; +15.175%]
• 🟥 throughput [-440.650op/s; -240.692op/s] or [-13.736%; -7.503%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+299.377ms; +300.043ms] or [+149.420%; +149.752%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

• unstable execution_time [+221.550ms; +289.911ms] or [+240.723%; +315.000%]
• 🟩 throughput [+767.253op/s; +997.960op/s] or [+6.305%; +8.200%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

• unstable execution_time [+235.122ms; +287.140ms] or [+178.526%; +218.023%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

• unstable execution_time [+289.994ms; +344.133ms] or [+133.336%; +158.229%]
• 🟥 throughput [-582.249op/s; -524.064op/s] or [-52.757%; -47.485%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

• unstable execution_time [+204.442ms; +337.678ms] or [+87.125%; +143.904%]
• 🟥 throughput [-674.164op/s; -590.578op/s] or [-44.967%; -39.392%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+333.068ms; +339.713ms] or [+199.213%; +203.188%]
• 🟥 throughput [-387.250op/s; -349.643op/s] or [-26.964%; -24.345%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

• 🟩 execution_time [-183.371µs; -139.887µs] or [-9.289%; -7.086%]
• 🟩 throughput [+40.149op/s; +52.000op/s] or [+7.926%; +10.265%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+303.724ms; +305.818ms] or [+152.949%; +154.004%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+300.176ms; +301.827ms] or [+150.419%; +151.246%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+299.321ms; +317.516ms] or [+150.366%; +159.507%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+299.938ms; +302.052ms] or [+150.619%; +151.680%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+297.991ms; +300.541ms] or [+147.343%; +148.604%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+303.072ms; +308.221ms] or [+153.610%; +156.220%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+301.935ms; +303.630ms] or [+151.544%; +152.395%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+295.549ms; +299.590ms] or [+147.304%; +149.318%]
• 🟩 throughput [+54049.481op/s; +61637.289op/s] or [+10.732%; +12.239%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+300.686ms; +304.722ms] or [+149.589%; +151.597%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

• 🟩 execution_time [-16.888ms; -13.242ms] or [-7.853%; -6.158%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

• unstable execution_time [+14.537µs; +60.085µs] or [+3.591%; +14.841%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-25.586KB; -25.564KB] or [-9.333%; -9.325%]
• unstable execution_time [+24.369µs; +132.646µs] or [+4.816%; +26.217%]
• unstable throughput [-313.359op/s; -30.969op/s] or [-15.637%; -1.545%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

• unstable execution_time [+48.282µs; +297.733µs] or [+8.367%; +51.595%]
• unstable throughput [-278.156op/s; +48.659op/s] or [-15.891%; +2.780%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

• unstable execution_time [+8.307µs; +13.432µs] or [+19.635%; +31.749%]
• 🟥 throughput [-5686.503op/s; -3643.291op/s] or [-23.938%; -15.337%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

• unstable execution_time [-14.560µs; -7.146µs] or [-22.589%; -11.087%]
• 🟩 throughput [+1762.937op/s; +3374.119op/s] or [+10.816%; +20.701%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+301.105ms; +303.243ms] or [+152.195%; +153.276%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+300.330ms; +302.518ms] or [+152.867%; +153.981%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+299.823ms; +302.022ms] or [+150.099%; +151.199%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

• 🟩 throughput [+31308.776op/s; +34509.908op/s] or [+5.926%; +6.532%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+299.400ms; +301.457ms] or [+149.224%; +150.249%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+300.694ms; +303.539ms] or [+150.994%; +152.423%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+303.442ms; +306.043ms] or [+153.886%; +155.205%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+299.658ms; +300.927ms] or [+149.471%; +150.104%]
• 🟩 throughput [+60866783.098op/s; +61300509.148op/s] or [+44.327%; +44.643%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

• unstable execution_time [+338.878ms; +399.948ms] or [+421.455%; +497.407%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+299.254ms; +300.189ms] or [+149.261%; +149.728%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

• 🟩 throughput [+97810.295op/s; +107273.863op/s] or [+9.132%; +10.016%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 throughput [+64746.376op/s; +83806.126op/s] or [+7.494%; +9.700%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

• 🟩 throughput [+84411.527op/s; +114263.978op/s] or [+6.534%; +8.844%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 throughput [+80474.873op/s; +89077.915op/s] or [+7.992%; +8.847%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

• 🟩 throughput [+46774.255op/s; +50925.155op/s] or [+8.493%; +9.247%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 throughput [+26233.475op/s; +35844.902op/s] or [+5.872%; +8.023%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

• 🟩 throughput [+76585.461op/s; +94141.685op/s] or [+8.557%; +10.518%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1