Skip to content

Bump DatadogTestCollector and DatadogTestLogger to 0.0.55 - #8949

Merged
andrewlock merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
chore/bump-datadog-test-packages-0.0.55
Jul 28, 2026
Merged

Bump DatadogTestCollector and DatadogTestLogger to 0.0.55#8949
andrewlock merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
chore/bump-datadog-test-packages-0.0.55

Conversation

@tonyredondo

@tonyredondo tonyredondo commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary of changes

Bumps the DatadogTestCollector and DatadogTestLogger package references from 0.0.54 to 0.0.55 in the tracer and profiler test projects.

Reason for change

Consume version 0.0.55 of the Datadog test tooling.

Implementation details

  • Update the shared tracer test package references.
  • Update the profiler integration test logger reference.

Test coverage

  • git diff --check passes.
  • dotnet restore tracer/test/Datadog.Trace.TestHelpers/Datadog.Trace.TestHelpers.csproj --disable-parallel --force-evaluate currently fails with NU1102 because DatadogTestLogger 0.0.55 was not yet available from the configured NuGet or Azure feeds at validation time. DatadogTestCollector 0.0.55 is available.
  • No test suite was run because restore could not complete.

Other details

#incident-57303

@tonyredondo
tonyredondo requested review from a team as code owners July 27, 2026 19:00

@bouwkast bouwkast left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 25b5ff4d4d

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

<ItemGroup Condition=" $(DD_LOGGER_ENABLED) != 'false' ">
<PackageReference Include="DatadogTestCollector" Version="0.0.54" ExcludeAssets="compile"/>
<PackageReference Include="DatadogTestLogger" Version="0.0.54" ExcludeAssets="compile"/>
<PackageReference Include="DatadogTestCollector" Version="0.0.55" ExcludeAssets="compile"/>

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Update the in-process collector assembly version

When the Datadog logger is enabled on server builds, the test runner loads tracer/test/test.settings, whose assemblyQualifiedName still requests Datadog.collector, Version=0.0.54.0. After this reference restores the 0.0.55 collector assembly, the in-process coverage collector cannot be resolved under the stale identity, breaking CI coverage collection; update the runsettings version alongside this package bump.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

<PackageReference Include="DatadogTestCollector" Version="0.0.54" ExcludeAssets="compile"/>
<PackageReference Include="DatadogTestLogger" Version="0.0.54" ExcludeAssets="compile"/>
<PackageReference Include="DatadogTestCollector" Version="0.0.55" ExcludeAssets="compile"/>
<PackageReference Include="DatadogTestLogger" Version="0.0.55" ExcludeAssets="compile"/>

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Wait until the logger package is available

With DD_LOGGER_ENABLED unset or enabled, every tracer test project imports this reference, but at this revision none of the configured NuGet or Azure feeds contains DatadogTestLogger 0.0.55: the documented validation restore already fails with NU1102. Consequently normal test restores cannot complete unless callers explicitly disable the logger; publish the package before taking this dependency or retain 0.0.54 until it is available.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (8949) and master.

✅ No regressions detected - check the details below

Full Metrics Comparison

FakeDbCommand

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration74.57 ± (74.30 - 74.84) ms71.02 ± (71.08 - 71.37) ms-4.8%
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration75.73 ± (75.81 - 76.13) ms75.33 ± (75.23 - 75.58) ms-0.5%
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1092.82 ± (1092.63 - 1101.01) ms1088.38 ± (1090.94 - 1099.90) ms-0.4%
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms22.16 ± (22.12 - 22.20) ms22.04 ± (22.01 - 22.07) ms-0.5%
process.time_to_main_ms82.01 ± (81.79 - 82.24) ms81.25 ± (81.07 - 81.43) ms-0.9%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.99 ± (10.99 - 11.00) MB10.99 ± (10.99 - 10.99) MB-0.0%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count12 ± (12 - 12)12 ± (12 - 12)+0.0%
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms21.87 ± (21.85 - 21.90) ms22.00 ± (21.97 - 22.03) ms+0.6%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms82.62 ± (82.48 - 82.76) ms82.26 ± (82.10 - 82.42) ms-0.4%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.03 ± (11.02 - 11.03) MB11.02 ± (11.02 - 11.03) MB-0.0%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count13 ± (13 - 13)13 ± (13 - 13)+0.0%
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms210.17 ± (209.31 - 211.04) ms211.30 ± (210.59 - 212.01) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms539.93 ± (538.64 - 541.22) ms539.93 ± (538.84 - 541.02) ms-0.0%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed49.56 ± (49.54 - 49.59) MB49.50 ± (49.47 - 49.53) MB-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)-0.1%
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms20.80 ± (20.78 - 20.83) ms20.84 ± (20.81 - 20.87) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms71.55 ± (71.40 - 71.70) ms70.91 ± (70.78 - 71.04) ms-0.9%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.72 ± (10.72 - 10.72) MB10.73 ± (10.73 - 10.73) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms20.72 ± (20.69 - 20.76) ms20.72 ± (20.70 - 20.74) ms-0.0%
process.time_to_main_ms72.03 ± (71.90 - 72.17) ms72.20 ± (72.06 - 72.34) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.84 ± (10.84 - 10.85) MB10.85 ± (10.85 - 10.86) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms372.59 ± (370.29 - 374.89) ms372.56 ± (370.29 - 374.82) ms-0.0%
process.time_to_main_ms546.05 ± (544.84 - 547.25) ms541.24 ± (540.15 - 542.32) ms-0.9%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed50.61 ± (50.59 - 50.64) MB50.62 ± (50.60 - 50.64) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)-0.0%
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms19.57 ± (19.51 - 19.63) ms19.49 ± (19.44 - 19.53) ms-0.4%
process.time_to_main_ms73.77 ± (73.46 - 74.09) ms73.91 ± (73.66 - 74.17) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.75 ± (7.74 - 7.75) MB7.77 ± (7.76 - 7.77) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms19.15 ± (19.12 - 19.18) ms19.18 ± (19.16 - 19.21) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms72.35 ± (72.15 - 72.55) ms72.25 ± (72.10 - 72.40) ms-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.80 ± (7.80 - 7.81) MB7.82 ± (7.81 - 7.82) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms302.43 ± (300.06 - 304.80) ms297.50 ± (295.40 - 299.61) ms-1.6%
process.time_to_main_ms494.24 ± (493.01 - 495.48) ms493.12 ± (491.83 - 494.42) ms-0.2%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed38.04 ± (38.01 - 38.07) MB38.09 ± (38.07 - 38.12) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count27 ± (27 - 27)27 ± (27 - 27)+0.6%✅⬆️

HttpMessageHandler

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration212.97 ± (213.14 - 214.07) ms215.36 ± (215.02 - 215.95) ms+1.1%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration218.06 ± (217.76 - 218.74) ms220.15 ± (219.64 - 220.57) ms+1.0%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1265.89 ± (1266.18 - 1272.85) ms1285.67 ± (1284.32 - 1292.26) ms+1.6%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms206.10 ± (205.73 - 206.48) ms206.58 ± (206.08 - 207.08) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms91.62 ± (91.29 - 91.96) ms91.64 ± (91.38 - 91.91) ms+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.02 ± (15.99 - 16.04) MB16.16 ± (16.14 - 16.17) MB+0.9%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)+0.0%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms205.99 ± (205.56 - 206.42) ms206.19 ± (205.70 - 206.68) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms92.71 ± (92.43 - 92.98) ms92.69 ± (92.46 - 92.92) ms-0.0%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.06 ± (16.04 - 16.08) MB16.18 ± (16.16 - 16.20) MB+0.8%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count21 ± (21 - 21)21 ± (21 - 21)-0.1%
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms404.58 ± (403.01 - 406.15) ms403.24 ± (401.87 - 404.61) ms-0.3%
process.time_to_main_ms575.64 ± (574.35 - 576.93) ms572.84 ± (571.23 - 574.44) ms-0.5%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed59.91 ± (59.85 - 59.98) MB59.68 ± (59.62 - 59.75) MB-0.4%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms209.64 ± (209.19 - 210.10) ms211.27 ± (210.85 - 211.70) ms+0.8%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms79.48 ± (79.18 - 79.78) ms80.35 ± (80.07 - 80.62) ms+1.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.44 ± (16.42 - 16.47) MB16.35 ± (16.33 - 16.37) MB-0.6%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (19 - 20)20 ± (19 - 20)-0.1%
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms210.86 ± (210.33 - 211.39) ms208.80 ± (208.40 - 209.20) ms-1.0%
process.time_to_main_ms81.35 ± (81.12 - 81.58) ms80.69 ± (80.47 - 80.91) ms-0.8%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.50 ± (16.47 - 16.52) MB16.40 ± (16.38 - 16.43) MB-0.6%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count21 ± (20 - 21)21 ± (20 - 21)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms579.50 ± (577.08 - 581.92) ms581.60 ± (579.29 - 583.91) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms591.04 ± (589.73 - 592.35) ms591.01 ± (589.74 - 592.27) ms-0.0%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed61.49 ± (61.41 - 61.57) MB61.68 ± (61.59 - 61.76) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count31 ± (31 - 31)31 ± (31 - 31)+0.0%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms209.99 ± (209.51 - 210.47) ms211.23 ± (210.77 - 211.68) ms+0.6%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms79.03 ± (78.74 - 79.33) ms79.29 ± (78.96 - 79.61) ms+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.75 ± (11.73 - 11.77) MB11.75 ± (11.73 - 11.77) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms208.96 ± (208.49 - 209.42) ms210.74 ± (210.26 - 211.22) ms+0.9%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms80.15 ± (79.93 - 80.38) ms80.63 ± (80.37 - 80.89) ms+0.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.76 ± (11.74 - 11.79) MB11.73 ± (11.71 - 11.75) MB-0.2%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)-0.0%
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms518.44 ± (512.31 - 524.57) ms529.33 ± (522.62 - 536.04) ms+2.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms538.38 ± (537.22 - 539.54) ms539.35 ± (538.34 - 540.37) ms+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed51.36 ± (51.30 - 51.43) MB51.49 ± (51.41 - 51.57) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)+0.1%✅⬆️
Comparison explanation

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program, and are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are highlighted in **red**. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

Duration charts
FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8949) - mean (71ms)  : 69, 73
    master - mean (75ms)  : 71, 78

    section Bailout
    This PR (8949) - mean (75ms)  : 74, 77
    master - mean (76ms)  : 74, 78

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8949) - mean (1,095ms)  : 1029, 1162
    master - mean (1,097ms)  : 1034, 1160

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8949) - mean (110ms)  : 106, 114
    master - mean (111ms)  : 105, 118

    section Bailout
    This PR (8949) - mean (111ms)  : 109, 113
    master - mean (111ms)  : 109, 113

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8949) - mean (787ms)  : 756, 819
    master - mean (788ms)  : 756, 819

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8949) - mean (98ms)  : 95, 100
    master - mean (98ms)  : 95, 102

    section Bailout
    This PR (8949) - mean (99ms)  : 97, 101
    master - mean (99ms)  : 96, 102

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8949) - mean (940ms)  : 904, 977
    master - mean (949ms)  : 912, 986

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8949) - mean (101ms)  : 95, 107
    master - mean (101ms)  : 95, 107

    section Bailout
    This PR (8949) - mean (98ms)  : 96, 101
    master - mean (99ms)  : 94, 104

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8949) - mean (822ms)  : 785, 858
    master - mean (825ms)  : 785, 866

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8949) - mean (215ms)  : 211, 220
    master - mean (214ms)  : 208, 219

    section Bailout
    This PR (8949) - mean (220ms)  : 215, 225
    master - mean (218ms)  : 213, 223

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8949) - mean (1,288ms)  : 1229, 1348
    master - mean (1,270ms)  : 1221, 1318

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8949) - mean (309ms)  : 301, 317
    master - mean (309ms)  : 302, 316

    section Bailout
    This PR (8949) - mean (309ms)  : 301, 317
    master - mean (309ms)  : 303, 315

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8949) - mean (1,019ms)  : 997, 1040
    master - mean (1,024ms)  : 1000, 1049

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8949) - mean (302ms)  : 295, 308
    master - mean (300ms)  : 292, 307

    section Bailout
    This PR (8949) - mean (299ms)  : 294, 304
    master - mean (302ms)  : 295, 309

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8949) - mean (1,211ms)  : 1159, 1263
    master - mean (1,208ms)  : 1167, 1249

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8949) - mean (301ms)  : 293, 310
    master - mean (300ms)  : 292, 308

    section Bailout
    This PR (8949) - mean (302ms)  : 294, 310
    master - mean (299ms)  : 293, 305

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8949) - mean (1,102ms)  : 1004, 1201
    master - mean (1,094ms)  : 1002, 1185

Loading

@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-07-27 19:54:54

Comparing candidate commit 25b5ff4 in PR branch chore/bump-datadog-test-packages-0.0.55 with baseline commit 433de1b in branch master.

📊 Benchmarking dashboard

Found 0 performance improvements and 2 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 70 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 58 known flaky benchmarks, 68 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.DbCommandBenchmark.ExecuteNonQuery net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-27497.468op/s; -24598.079op/s] or [-7.745%; -6.928%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-6349.411op/s; -5800.093op/s] or [-7.248%; -6.621%]

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-9823.008op/s; -9403.719op/s] or [-11.647%; -11.150%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 throughput [-9759.222op/s; -8377.574op/s] or [-9.923%; -8.518%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+323.506ms; +325.101ms] or [+160.535%; +161.327%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-40.318op/s; -36.705op/s] or [-7.254%; -6.604%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+378.868ms; +383.018ms] or [+299.329%; +302.608%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+89.474op/s; +96.377op/s] or [+11.797%; +12.707%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+391.414ms; +394.810ms] or [+346.387%; +349.392%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.308KB; +1.308KB] or [+27.528%; +27.540%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+9.976%; +9.987%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-16.143ms; -11.962ms] or [-7.539%; -5.586%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+6954.804op/s; +9765.712op/s] or [+5.077%; +7.128%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+27.500%; +27.510%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.307KB; +1.307KB] or [+105.743%; +105.758%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-252623.897op/s; -249483.880op/s] or [-25.794%; -25.474%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+471 bytes; +472 bytes] or [+38.557%; +38.566%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-26.047ms; -21.133ms] or [-11.616%; -9.425%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.272KB; +1.272KB] or [+105.288%; +105.304%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-155129.088op/s; -138676.133op/s] or [-22.289%; -19.925%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+7979.070op/s; +10658.926op/s] or [+6.356%; +8.491%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+389473.158op/s; +412275.647op/s] or [+12.987%; +13.747%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-18.677ms; -14.330ms] or [-8.609%; -6.606%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+159054.913op/s; +215785.092op/s] or [+6.313%; +8.565%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.155ms; +301.294ms] or [+149.977%; +150.546%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.333ms; +303.994ms] or [+151.458%; +153.305%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+654.800op/s; +871.008op/s] or [+5.008%; +6.662%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.781ms; +302.810ms] or [+151.006%; +152.532%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.311ms; +298.595ms] or [+146.027%; +146.658%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+296.677ms; +299.289ms] or [+145.034%; +146.311%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+296.754ms; +298.512ms] or [+148.317%; +149.196%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+24.840µs; +51.721µs] or [+5.697%; +11.862%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-251.615op/s; -130.727op/s] or [-10.939%; -5.684%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+26.922µs; +50.863µs] or [+8.595%; +16.238%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-467.133op/s; -266.021op/s] or [-14.562%; -8.293%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.645ms; +300.429ms] or [+149.553%; +149.945%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+418.619ms; +425.141ms] or [+454.847%; +461.933%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+750.854op/s; +934.599op/s] or [+6.170%; +7.680%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+241.436ms; +291.849ms] or [+183.320%; +221.598%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+2.832KB; +2.837KB] or [+5.031%; +5.041%]
  • unstable execution_time [+296.805ms; +354.317ms] or [+136.468%; +162.912%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-585.228op/s; -538.073op/s] or [-53.027%; -48.755%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+209.360ms; +342.635ms] or [+89.220%; +146.017%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-669.896op/s; -586.388op/s] or [-44.682%; -39.112%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+344.269ms; +355.451ms] or [+205.913%; +212.601%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-395.791op/s; -358.083op/s] or [-27.558%; -24.933%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-189.487µs; -142.622µs] or [-9.599%; -7.225%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+41.416op/s; +53.642op/s] or [+8.176%; +10.589%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.823ms; +305.501ms] or [+153.000%; +153.845%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.841ms; +302.788ms] or [+150.752%; +151.727%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.302ms; +304.485ms] or [+151.362%; +152.961%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.867ms; +305.095ms] or [+151.587%; +153.208%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.897ms; +300.405ms] or [+147.297%; +148.537%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.696ms; +308.467ms] or [+154.433%; +156.345%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.799ms; +301.422ms] or [+150.472%; +151.287%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.968ms; +304.135ms] or [+150.005%; +151.583%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+47189.648op/s; +52392.193op/s] or [+9.370%; +10.403%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.841ms; +302.339ms] or [+148.671%; +150.411%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-17.412ms; -13.752ms] or [-8.097%; -6.395%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+19481.053op/s; +26244.050op/s] or [+5.344%; +7.199%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

  • unstable execution_time [+13.829µs; +58.178µs] or [+3.416%; +14.370%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-20.923KB; -20.902KB] or [-7.632%; -7.624%]
  • unstable execution_time [-43.533µs; +13.604µs] or [-8.604%; +2.689%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-55.999µs; +6.458µs] or [-9.704%; +1.119%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+7.646µs; +12.752µs] or [+18.073%; +30.143%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-5440.235op/s; -3456.284op/s] or [-22.902%; -14.550%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-14.182µs; -5.976µs] or [-22.002%; -9.272%]
  • unstable throughput [+1565.169op/s; +3358.392op/s] or [+9.603%; +20.605%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.732ms; +303.939ms] or [+153.017%; +153.628%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.278ms; +306.726ms] or [+154.368%; +156.123%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.836ms; +301.734ms] or [+149.604%; +151.055%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+31884.173op/s; +38324.141op/s] or [+6.035%; +7.254%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.234ms; +300.311ms] or [+148.643%; +149.678%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.021ms; +304.332ms] or [+151.660%; +152.821%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.209ms; +304.374ms] or [+153.261%; +154.359%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.283ms; +301.105ms] or [+149.783%; +150.193%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+66134904.909op/s; +66460558.493op/s] or [+48.164%; +48.401%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+345.085ms; +401.260ms] or [+429.174%; +499.038%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.194ms; +300.222ms] or [+149.231%; +149.744%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+18330484.702op/s; +19304448.017op/s] or [+8.119%; +8.551%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+59548.095op/s; +101691.479op/s] or [+5.560%; +9.495%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+69383.855op/s; +77762.028op/s] or [+6.891%; +7.723%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+32215.641op/s; +42003.262op/s] or [+5.850%; +7.627%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+76600.834op/s; +94022.011op/s] or [+8.558%; +10.505%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

@andrewlock
andrewlock enabled auto-merge (squash) July 28, 2026 08:34

@gleocadie gleocadie left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@andrewlock
andrewlock merged commit fb1bb2e into master Jul 28, 2026
150 of 151 checks passed
@andrewlock
andrewlock deleted the chore/bump-datadog-test-packages-0.0.55 branch July 28, 2026 09:16
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone Jul 28, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants