Test updating docker group 1 to test containers - #8960
Conversation
Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (8960) and master. ✅ No regressions detected - check the details below Full Metrics ComparisonFakeDbCommand
HttpMessageHandler
Comparison explanationExecution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program, and are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are highlighted in **red**. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:
Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard. Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph). Duration chartsFakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)gantt
title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
dateFormat x
axisFormat %Q
todayMarker off
section Baseline
This PR (8960) - mean (74ms) : 71, 78
master - mean (72ms) : 69, 75
section Bailout
This PR (8960) - mean (76ms) : 74, 78
master - mean (79ms) : 75, 83
section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
This PR (8960) - mean (1,094ms) : 1041, 1147
master - mean (1,099ms) : 1029, 1168
FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)gantt
title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
dateFormat x
axisFormat %Q
todayMarker off
section Baseline
This PR (8960) - mean (113ms) : 107, 118
master - mean (115ms) : 109, 120
section Bailout
This PR (8960) - mean (112ms) : 110, 114
master - mean (113ms) : 108, 117
section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
This PR (8960) - mean (785ms) : 762, 808
master - mean (783ms) : 760, 807
FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)gantt
title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
dateFormat x
axisFormat %Q
todayMarker off
section Baseline
This PR (8960) - mean (101ms) : 96, 106
master - mean (98ms) : 94, 102
section Bailout
This PR (8960) - mean (99ms) : 96, 102
master - mean (99ms) : 97, 100
section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
This PR (8960) - mean (948ms) : 895, 1001
master - mean (943ms) : 900, 987
FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)gantt
title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
dateFormat x
axisFormat %Q
todayMarker off
section Baseline
This PR (8960) - mean (97ms) : 93, 102
master - mean (100ms) : 94, 106
section Bailout
This PR (8960) - mean (101ms) : 96, 106
master - mean (99ms) : 95, 104
section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
This PR (8960) - mean (819ms) : 783, 855
master - mean (819ms) : 781, 857
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)gantt
title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
dateFormat x
axisFormat %Q
todayMarker off
section Baseline
This PR (8960) - mean (207ms) : 202, 212
master - mean (206ms) : 202, 210
section Bailout
This PR (8960) - mean (210ms) : 207, 212
master - mean (209ms) : 204, 214
section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
This PR (8960) - mean (1,245ms) : 1207, 1283
master - mean (1,231ms) : 1172, 1289
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)gantt
title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
dateFormat x
axisFormat %Q
todayMarker off
section Baseline
This PR (8960) - mean (295ms) : 290, 299
master - mean (293ms) : 287, 298
section Bailout
This PR (8960) - mean (296ms) : 293, 300
master - mean (293ms) : 289, 297
section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
This PR (8960) - mean (992ms) : 974, 1010
master - mean (981ms) : 954, 1008
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)gantt
title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
dateFormat x
axisFormat %Q
todayMarker off
section Baseline
This PR (8960) - mean (290ms) : 285, 294
master - mean (288ms) : 283, 292
section Bailout
This PR (8960) - mean (291ms) : 286, 295
master - mean (288ms) : 284, 291
section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
This PR (8960) - mean (1,185ms) : 1148, 1223
master - mean (1,173ms) : 1143, 1203
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)gantt
title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
dateFormat x
axisFormat %Q
todayMarker off
section Baseline
This PR (8960) - mean (292ms) : 285, 298
master - mean (286ms) : 282, 291
section Bailout
This PR (8960) - mean (290ms) : 286, 294
master - mean (286ms) : 281, 291
section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
This PR (8960) - mean (1,065ms) : 1018, 1112
master - mean (1,054ms) : 1006, 1102
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BenchmarksBenchmark execution time: 2026-08-03 13:46:53 Comparing candidate commit 0509be0 in PR branch Found 0 performance improvements and 1 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 71 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 59 known flaky benchmarks, 67 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.
|
6e19743 to
8c92584
Compare
Snapshots difference summaryThe following differences have been observed in committed snapshots. It is meant to help the reviewer. 4 occurrences of : - Resource: Hello,
+ Resource: NoOp,
[...]
- couchbase.operation.code: Hello,
- couchbase.operation.key: obfuscated,
+ couchbase.operation.code: NoOp,
+ couchbase.operation.key: ,
1 occurrences of : + Resource: SaslList,
+ Service: Samples.Couchbase3-couchbase,
+ Type: db,
+ Tags: {
+ component: Couchbase,
+ couchbase.operation.code: SaslList,
+ couchbase.operation.key: ,
+ db.couchbase.seed.nodes: couchbase,
+ env: integration_tests,
+ language: dotnet,
+ runtime-id: Guid_1,
+ span.kind: client,
+ _dd.base_service: Samples.Couchbase3,
+ _dd.svc_src: couchbase
+ },
+ Metrics: {
+ process_id: 0,
+ _dd.top_level: 1.0,
+ _dd.tracer_kr: 1.0,
+ _sampling_priority_v1: 1.0
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ TraceId: Id_21,
+ SpanId: Id_22,
+ Name: couchbase.query,
+ Resource: SaslList,
+ Service: Samples.Couchbase3-couchbase,
+ Type: db,
+ Tags: {
+ component: Couchbase,
+ couchbase.operation.code: SaslList,
+ couchbase.operation.key: ,
+ db.couchbase.seed.nodes: couchbase,
+ env: integration_tests,
+ language: dotnet,
+ runtime-id: Guid_1,
+ span.kind: client,
+ _dd.base_service: Samples.Couchbase3,
+ _dd.svc_src: couchbase
+ },
+ Metrics: {
+ process_id: 0,
+ _dd.top_level: 1.0,
+ _dd.tracer_kr: 1.0,
+ _sampling_priority_v1: 1.0
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ TraceId: Id_23,
+ SpanId: Id_24,
+ Name: couchbase.query,
2 occurrences of : - TraceId: Id_21,
- SpanId: Id_22,
+ TraceId: Id_25,
+ SpanId: Id_26,
2 occurrences of : - TraceId: Id_23,
- SpanId: Id_24,
+ TraceId: Id_27,
+ SpanId: Id_28,
1 occurrences of : + Resource: SaslList,
+ Service: Samples.Couchbase3,
+ Type: db,
+ Tags: {
+ component: Couchbase,
+ couchbase.operation.code: SaslList,
+ couchbase.operation.key: ,
+ db.couchbase.seed.nodes: couchbase,
+ env: integration_tests,
+ language: dotnet,
+ peer.service: couchbase,
+ runtime-id: Guid_1,
+ span.kind: client,
+ version: 1.0.0,
+ _dd.peer.service.source: db.couchbase.seed.nodes
+ },
+ Metrics: {
+ process_id: 0,
+ _dd.top_level: 1.0,
+ _dd.tracer_kr: 1.0,
+ _sampling_priority_v1: 1.0
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ TraceId: Id_21,
+ SpanId: Id_22,
+ Name: couchbase.query,
+ Resource: SaslList,
+ Service: Samples.Couchbase3,
+ Type: db,
+ Tags: {
+ component: Couchbase,
+ couchbase.operation.code: SaslList,
+ couchbase.operation.key: ,
+ db.couchbase.seed.nodes: couchbase,
+ env: integration_tests,
+ language: dotnet,
+ peer.service: couchbase,
+ runtime-id: Guid_1,
+ span.kind: client,
+ version: 1.0.0,
+ _dd.peer.service.source: db.couchbase.seed.nodes
+ },
+ Metrics: {
+ process_id: 0,
+ _dd.top_level: 1.0,
+ _dd.tracer_kr: 1.0,
+ _sampling_priority_v1: 1.0
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ TraceId: Id_23,
+ SpanId: Id_24,
+ Name: couchbase.query,
|
Summary of changes
Swaps docker group 1 to testcontainers
Very WIP at the moment
We are investigating whether this will help with load on the CI VMs
Reason for change
Implementation details
Test coverage
Other details
#incident-57303