Skip to content

[Profiler] Cleanup generic method frame encoding and namespaceless types - #8961

Merged
chrisnas merged 5 commits into
masterfrom
chrisnas/fix_static_generic_method_frame
Jul 31, 2026
Merged

[Profiler] Cleanup generic method frame encoding and namespaceless types#8961
chrisnas merged 5 commits into
masterfrom
chrisnas/fix_static_generic_method_frame

Conversation

@chrisnas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of changes

Ensure that no '.' is added when there is no namespace and provide full type name in generics

Reason for change

Weird <.<Foo>> or .Bar type names in frames

Implementation details

  • Fix namespaceless case
  • Reuse helper to get full type names in generics

Test coverage

Fix regex and add dedicated tests for better coverage

Other details

@chrisnas
chrisnas requested a review from a team as a code owner July 30, 2026 08:26
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the area:profiler Issues related to the continous-profiler label Jul 30, 2026

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 97a8153295

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread profiler/src/Demos/Samples.Computer01/GlobalStruct.cs
@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot Bot commented Jul 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (8961) and master.

⚠️ Potential regressions detected

HttpMessageHandler

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration191.33 ± (191.26 - 192.06) ms208.93 ± (208.48 - 209.39) ms+9.2%❌⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration195.07 ± (195.02 - 195.45) ms211.65 ± (211.37 - 212.14) ms+8.5%❌⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1174.32 ± (1175.82 - 1183.25) ms1244.85 ± (1243.56 - 1249.88) ms+6.0%❌⬆️
Full Metrics Comparison

FakeDbCommand

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration74.01 ± (73.73 - 74.28) ms70.84 ± (70.95 - 71.29) ms-4.3%
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration76.13 ± (75.94 - 76.44) ms75.20 ± (75.16 - 75.48) ms-1.2%
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1083.43 ± (1085.28 - 1092.10) ms1087.56 ± (1088.54 - 1096.00) ms+0.4%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms22.28 ± (22.24 - 22.33) ms22.16 ± (22.12 - 22.20) ms-0.5%
process.time_to_main_ms83.33 ± (83.07 - 83.58) ms81.29 ± (81.11 - 81.46) ms-2.4%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.00 ± (10.99 - 11.00) MB10.99 ± (10.99 - 10.99) MB-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count12 ± (12 - 12)12 ± (12 - 12)+0.0%
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms22.03 ± (22.00 - 22.06) ms22.06 ± (22.03 - 22.09) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms83.07 ± (82.91 - 83.23) ms82.41 ± (82.26 - 82.57) ms-0.8%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.03 ± (11.03 - 11.04) MB11.02 ± (11.02 - 11.03) MB-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count13 ± (13 - 13)13 ± (13 - 13)+0.0%
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms209.16 ± (208.28 - 210.04) ms211.04 ± (209.96 - 212.12) ms+0.9%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms533.77 ± (532.47 - 535.06) ms540.96 ± (539.66 - 542.26) ms+1.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed49.67 ± (49.63 - 49.70) MB49.55 ± (49.51 - 49.59) MB-0.2%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)-0.0%
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms21.04 ± (21.00 - 21.08) ms20.73 ± (20.70 - 20.77) ms-1.4%
process.time_to_main_ms73.86 ± (73.61 - 74.11) ms70.84 ± (70.70 - 70.98) ms-4.1%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.72 ± (10.72 - 10.72) MB10.73 ± (10.73 - 10.73) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms20.82 ± (20.78 - 20.86) ms20.71 ± (20.69 - 20.74) ms-0.5%
process.time_to_main_ms72.43 ± (72.28 - 72.58) ms72.08 ± (71.94 - 72.23) ms-0.5%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.85 ± (10.84 - 10.85) MB10.85 ± (10.85 - 10.86) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms368.25 ± (366.12 - 370.38) ms370.82 ± (368.68 - 372.96) ms+0.7%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms544.80 ± (543.56 - 546.04) ms544.56 ± (543.48 - 545.64) ms-0.0%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed50.66 ± (50.64 - 50.67) MB50.65 ± (50.63 - 50.66) MB-0.0%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)-0.3%
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms19.18 ± (19.15 - 19.21) ms19.36 ± (19.32 - 19.39) ms+0.9%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms70.19 ± (70.03 - 70.35) ms73.31 ± (73.07 - 73.55) ms+4.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.77 ± (7.76 - 7.77) MB7.77 ± (7.76 - 7.77) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms19.19 ± (19.15 - 19.23) ms19.02 ± (18.99 - 19.04) ms-0.9%
process.time_to_main_ms73.67 ± (73.43 - 73.91) ms71.86 ± (71.69 - 72.03) ms-2.5%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.82 ± (7.81 - 7.82) MB7.83 ± (7.82 - 7.84) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms297.76 ± (295.42 - 300.10) ms295.55 ± (293.16 - 297.93) ms-0.7%
process.time_to_main_ms490.56 ± (489.75 - 491.38) ms496.29 ± (495.04 - 497.54) ms+1.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed38.07 ± (38.04 - 38.10) MB38.04 ± (38.01 - 38.06) MB-0.1%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count27 ± (27 - 27)27 ± (27 - 27)-0.0%

HttpMessageHandler

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration191.33 ± (191.26 - 192.06) ms208.93 ± (208.48 - 209.39) ms+9.2%❌⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration195.07 ± (195.02 - 195.45) ms211.65 ± (211.37 - 212.14) ms+8.5%❌⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1174.32 ± (1175.82 - 1183.25) ms1244.85 ± (1243.56 - 1249.88) ms+6.0%❌⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms188.06 ± (187.65 - 188.47) ms200.02 ± (199.65 - 200.40) ms+6.4%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms82.51 ± (82.23 - 82.78) ms88.06 ± (87.74 - 88.38) ms+6.7%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.24 ± (16.22 - 16.27) MB16.09 ± (16.06 - 16.11) MB-1.0%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)+0.5%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms190.97 ± (190.58 - 191.36) ms199.84 ± (199.46 - 200.22) ms+4.6%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms85.10 ± (84.91 - 85.28) ms89.93 ± (89.68 - 90.19) ms+5.7%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.29 ± (16.26 - 16.31) MB16.14 ± (16.12 - 16.16) MB-0.9%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count21 ± (20 - 21)21 ± (21 - 21)+1.0%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms380.59 ± (379.29 - 381.90) ms398.62 ± (397.24 - 400.00) ms+4.7%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms535.63 ± (534.55 - 536.70) ms559.92 ± (558.67 - 561.18) ms+4.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed57.97 ± (57.91 - 58.02) MB59.70 ± (59.54 - 59.85) MB+3.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)+1.3%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms190.92 ± (190.66 - 191.18) ms206.10 ± (205.55 - 206.64) ms+7.9%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms71.56 ± (71.38 - 71.75) ms77.53 ± (77.25 - 77.82) ms+8.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.26 ± (16.11 - 16.42) MB16.40 ± (16.37 - 16.43) MB+0.8%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count18 ± (18 - 18)19 ± (19 - 20)+8.0%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms190.81 ± (190.53 - 191.09) ms205.21 ± (204.73 - 205.69) ms+7.5%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms72.65 ± (72.54 - 72.76) ms78.38 ± (78.15 - 78.60) ms+7.9%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.23 ± (16.08 - 16.39) MB16.52 ± (16.49 - 16.54) MB+1.7%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (19 - 20)21 ± (20 - 21)+4.0%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms581.60 ± (579.18 - 584.03) ms579.57 ± (577.19 - 581.95) ms-0.3%
process.time_to_main_ms548.75 ± (547.20 - 550.29) ms571.94 ± (570.67 - 573.22) ms+4.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed61.65 ± (61.58 - 61.71) MB61.44 ± (61.39 - 61.49) MB-0.3%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count31 ± (31 - 31)31 ± (31 - 31)-0.2%
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms207.54 ± (207.15 - 207.93) ms205.46 ± (205.03 - 205.90) ms-1.0%
process.time_to_main_ms78.05 ± (77.77 - 78.32) ms77.34 ± (77.06 - 77.62) ms-0.9%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.72 ± (11.70 - 11.75) MB11.82 ± (11.80 - 11.84) MB+0.8%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)-0.2%
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms207.63 ± (207.18 - 208.07) ms205.47 ± (204.98 - 205.96) ms-1.0%
process.time_to_main_ms79.47 ± (79.25 - 79.68) ms78.43 ± (78.17 - 78.70) ms-1.3%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.79 ± (11.77 - 11.81) MB11.83 ± (11.81 - 11.85) MB+0.4%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)-0.2%
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms514.54 ± (509.77 - 519.32) ms509.82 ± (506.11 - 513.53) ms-0.9%
process.time_to_main_ms525.91 ± (525.01 - 526.81) ms523.97 ± (523.08 - 524.85) ms-0.4%
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed51.43 ± (51.37 - 51.48) MB51.42 ± (51.37 - 51.46) MB-0.0%
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)-0.1%
Comparison explanation

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program, and are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are highlighted in **red**. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

Duration charts
FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8961) - mean (71ms)  : 69, 74
    master - mean (74ms)  : 70, 78

    section Bailout
    This PR (8961) - mean (75ms)  : 74, 77
    master - mean (76ms)  : 73, 80

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8961) - mean (1,092ms)  : 1038, 1147
    master - mean (1,089ms)  : 1038, 1139

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8961) - mean (110ms)  : 106, 114
    master - mean (113ms)  : 108, 118

    section Bailout
    This PR (8961) - mean (111ms)  : 108, 113
    master - mean (112ms)  : 110, 114

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8961) - mean (789ms)  : 763, 814
    master - mean (781ms)  : 759, 804

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8961) - mean (98ms)  : 95, 101
    master - mean (102ms)  : 96, 108

    section Bailout
    This PR (8961) - mean (99ms)  : 97, 101
    master - mean (99ms)  : 97, 102

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8961) - mean (946ms)  : 911, 982
    master - mean (942ms)  : 908, 975

Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8961) - mean (101ms)  : 96, 106
    master - mean (96ms)  : 93, 99

    section Bailout
    This PR (8961) - mean (98ms)  : 94, 102
    master - mean (101ms)  : 96, 105

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8961) - mean (823ms)  : 778, 868
    master - mean (819ms)  : 782, 856

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8961) - mean (209ms)  : 204, 214
    master - mean (192ms)  : 188, 196

    section Bailout
    This PR (8961) - mean (212ms)  : crit, 208, 215
    master - mean (195ms)  : 193, 197

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8961) - mean (1,247ms)  : crit, 1201, 1292
    master - mean (1,180ms)  : 1127, 1233

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8961) - mean (299ms)  : 291, 306
    master - mean (280ms)  : 272, 288

    section Bailout
    This PR (8961) - mean (300ms)  : 294, 306
    master - mean (285ms)  : 280, 291

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8961) - mean (1,000ms)  : 975, 1024
    master - mean (957ms)  : 933, 982

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8961) - mean (293ms)  : 286, 300
    master - mean (272ms)  : 267, 276

    section Bailout
    This PR (8961) - mean (292ms)  : crit, 286, 299
    master - mean (272ms)  : 269, 275

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8961) - mean (1,188ms)  : 1150, 1225
    master - mean (1,164ms)  : 1119, 1208

Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8961) - mean (294ms)  : 286, 302
    master - mean (297ms)  : 289, 305

    section Bailout
    This PR (8961) - mean (294ms)  : 288, 301
    master - mean (298ms)  : 291, 304

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8961) - mean (1,069ms)  : 1005, 1133
    master - mean (1,076ms)  : 1007, 1145

Loading

@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Jul 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-07-31 12:54:53

Comparing candidate commit 3e5b3d8 in PR branch chrisnas/fix_static_generic_method_frame with baseline commit c62d6bf in branch master.

📊 Benchmarking dashboard

Found 0 performance improvements and 2 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 70 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 66 known flaky benchmarks, 60 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.DbCommandBenchmark.ExecuteNonQuery net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-32357.003op/s; -29087.541op/s] or [-9.113%; -8.193%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-4918.431op/s; -4604.042op/s] or [-5.615%; -5.256%]

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-8603.854op/s; -8164.507op/s] or [-10.202%; -9.681%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 throughput [-9353.499op/s; -8053.670op/s] or [-9.510%; -8.189%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.138ms; +307.900ms] or [+149.435%; +152.791%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-45.397op/s; -41.803op/s] or [-8.168%; -7.521%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+381.542ms; +382.776ms] or [+301.441%; +302.416%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+89.669op/s; +91.786op/s] or [+11.823%; +12.102%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+389.151ms; +392.173ms] or [+344.384%; +347.058%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+4.693KB; +4.694KB] or [+98.806%; +98.821%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-59938.980op/s; -59589.208op/s] or [-46.636%; -46.363%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.816KB; +3.816KB] or [+80.699%; +80.711%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-15.327ms; -11.142ms] or [-7.158%; -5.204%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-59900.593op/s; -57135.139op/s] or [-43.724%; -41.705%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+4.544KB; +4.544KB] or [+98.261%; +98.274%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-48241.147op/s; -45993.960op/s] or [-43.616%; -41.584%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.315KB; +1.315KB] or [+106.388%; +106.404%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-276203.008op/s; -271727.185op/s] or [-28.202%; -27.745%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+479 bytes; +480 bytes] or [+39.212%; +39.221%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-25.300ms; -20.180ms] or [-11.283%; -8.999%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-76498.628op/s; -52859.878op/s] or [-8.172%; -5.647%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.280KB; +1.280KB] or [+105.947%; +105.963%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-163159.724op/s; -147028.073op/s] or [-23.443%; -21.125%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.378KB; +3.378KB] or [+89.003%; +89.017%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-72749.517op/s; -71986.020op/s] or [-48.960%; -48.446%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.336KB; +3.336KB] or [+88.150%; +88.161%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-73683.669op/s; -70801.737op/s] or [-46.884%; -45.050%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.264KB; +3.264KB] or [+88.493%; +88.506%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-56301.489op/s; -53685.353op/s] or [-44.851%; -42.767%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+285798.945op/s; +312343.536op/s] or [+9.530%; +10.415%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-19.550ms; -15.127ms] or [-9.012%; -6.973%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.759KB; -13.757KB] or [-42.326%; -42.318%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.409ms; +301.139ms] or [+150.104%; +150.469%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+938.974op/s; +961.705op/s] or [+10.371%; +10.622%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.722KB; -13.718KB] or [-42.341%; -42.329%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.887ms; +302.967ms] or [+151.234%; +152.787%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+2396.840op/s; +2613.993op/s] or [+18.332%; +19.993%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.722KB; -13.718KB] or [-42.341%; -42.329%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.624ms; +303.080ms] or [+151.431%; +152.668%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1913.508op/s; +2043.410op/s] or [+18.474%; +19.728%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.243ms; +299.127ms] or [+146.485%; +146.919%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+576.926op/s; +594.358op/s] or [+15.295%; +15.757%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.278ms; +300.731ms] or [+145.817%; +147.016%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+2371.670op/s; +2463.114op/s] or [+34.456%; +35.784%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.245ms; +301.749ms] or [+150.562%; +150.814%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1407.762op/s; +1429.160op/s] or [+27.943%; +28.368%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472

  • 🟩 execution_time [-143.401µs; -138.983µs] or [-29.442%; -28.535%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+823.827op/s; +854.074op/s] or [+40.124%; +41.597%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-135.202µs; -108.333µs] or [-31.009%; -24.846%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+820.691op/s; +947.071op/s] or [+35.680%; +41.175%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-140.712µs; -118.712µs] or [-30.148%; -25.434%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+759.865op/s; +842.721op/s] or [+35.077%; +38.902%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472

  • 🟩 execution_time [-124.890µs; -119.882µs] or [-33.719%; -32.367%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1303.082op/s; +1367.115op/s] or [+48.260%; +50.632%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-99.830µs; -76.093µs] or [-31.871%; -24.293%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1130.281op/s; +1337.677op/s] or [+35.234%; +41.699%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-137.602µs; -115.174µs] or [-37.643%; -31.507%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1326.488op/s; +1465.370op/s] or [+47.602%; +52.586%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.528ms; +300.337ms] or [+149.495%; +149.899%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+406.250ms; +417.669ms] or [+441.407%; +453.814%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+900.706op/s; +1093.960op/s] or [+7.401%; +8.989%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+245.150ms; +307.203ms] or [+186.140%; +233.256%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • unstable execution_time [+312.136ms; +371.566ms] or [+143.517%; +170.842%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-572.240op/s; -515.350op/s] or [-51.851%; -46.696%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+203.371ms; +336.618ms] or [+86.668%; +143.453%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-678.924op/s; -594.928op/s] or [-45.284%; -39.682%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+336.857ms; +347.930ms] or [+201.479%; +208.103%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-419.778op/s; -378.144op/s] or [-29.229%; -26.330%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.207ms; +302.839ms] or [+151.682%; +152.504%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.957ms; +304.633ms] or [+151.311%; +152.652%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.093ms; +305.842ms] or [+151.759%; +153.642%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.897ms; +301.267ms] or [+150.598%; +151.286%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+18369.489op/s; +19862.365op/s] or [+6.154%; +6.654%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.853ms; +302.825ms] or [+148.758%; +149.734%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.364ms; +307.004ms] or [+153.758%; +155.603%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.420ms; +301.677ms] or [+150.784%; +151.415%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.296ms; +302.284ms] or [+149.670%; +150.661%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+42390.298op/s; +47273.347op/s] or [+8.417%; +9.387%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.369ms; +305.297ms] or [+149.928%; +151.883%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-16.002ms; -12.337ms] or [-7.441%; -5.737%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+23356.637op/s; +30555.383op/s] or [+6.407%; +8.382%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

  • unstable execution_time [+14.036µs; +59.942µs] or [+3.467%; +14.806%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-19.262KB; -19.239KB] or [-7.026%; -7.018%]
  • unstable execution_time [-49.133µs; +5.784µs] or [-9.711%; +1.143%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-18.166KB; -18.147KB] or [-6.622%; -6.615%]
  • unstable execution_time [-64.980µs; -2.753µs] or [-11.261%; -0.477%]
  • unstable throughput [+24.912op/s; +202.898op/s] or [+1.423%; +11.592%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+6.894µs; +12.545µs] or [+16.295%; +29.652%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-5217.740op/s; -3144.339op/s] or [-21.965%; -13.237%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-15.292µs; -7.326µs] or [-23.726%; -11.366%]
  • unstable throughput [+1978.515op/s; +3619.721op/s] or [+12.139%; +22.208%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.155ms; +304.837ms] or [+153.231%; +154.082%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.028ms; +305.329ms] or [+154.240%; +155.412%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.838ms; +303.070ms] or [+150.606%; +151.724%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+39155.158op/s; +42260.837op/s] or [+7.411%; +7.999%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.942ms; +302.354ms] or [+149.494%; +150.696%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.726ms; +303.051ms] or [+151.010%; +152.178%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.329ms; +305.446ms] or [+153.829%; +154.903%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.377ms; +300.366ms] or [+149.331%; +149.824%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+61326849.403op/s; +61740167.217op/s] or [+44.662%; +44.963%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+421.008ms; +423.988ms] or [+523.598%; +527.305%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.929ms; +300.091ms] or [+149.099%; +149.678%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+53771.463op/s; +72200.352op/s] or [+5.020%; +6.741%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+48271.254op/s; +68221.815op/s] or [+5.587%; +7.897%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+94962.959op/s; +124740.978op/s] or [+7.350%; +9.655%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+70066.805op/s; +77544.533op/s] or [+6.959%; +7.701%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+47018.060op/s; +52838.821op/s] or [+8.538%; +9.595%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+25250.401op/s; +34987.700op/s] or [+5.652%; +7.831%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+70609.991op/s; +87373.324op/s] or [+7.889%; +9.762%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

@chrisnas
chrisnas enabled auto-merge (squash) July 31, 2026 12:06
@chrisnas
chrisnas merged commit 9239376 into master Jul 31, 2026
146 of 149 checks passed
@chrisnas
chrisnas deleted the chrisnas/fix_static_generic_method_frame branch July 31, 2026 13:31
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone Jul 31, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:profiler Issues related to the continous-profiler

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants