Skip to content

Fix support for building StackExchange Redis sample in latest package version - #8982

Open
andrewlock wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
andrew/fix-redis-update
Open

Fix support for building StackExchange Redis sample in latest package version#8982
andrewlock wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
andrew/fix-redis-update

Conversation

@andrewlock

@andrewlock andrewlock commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary of changes

Fix samples from breaking in latest version of StackExchange.Redis

Reason for change

In 3.1.0, they introduce a new obsolete attribute, in preparation for removing of a property.

error CS0619: 'CommandFlags.DemandSlave' is obsolete: 'Starting with Redis version 5, Redis has moved to 'replica' terminology. Please use DemandReplica instead, this will be removed in 3.2.'

Implementation details

Gate the problematic API on 3.1.0+

Test coverage

I'll cherry-pick this into #8955 to confirm

Other details

Creating as a separate PR rather than pushing directly to the test PR to avoid the fact it can automatically get re-pushed

@andrewlock
andrewlock requested a review from a team as a code owner August 3, 2026 14:46
@andrewlock andrewlock added the area:tests unit tests, integration tests label Aug 3, 2026
@andrewlock
andrewlock requested a review from a team as a code owner August 3, 2026 14:46
@andrewlock andrewlock added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Aug 3, 2026
@andrewlock
andrewlock requested review from vandonr and removed request for a team August 3, 2026 14:46
@andrewlock andrewlock added the area:dependabot dependabot updates label Aug 3, 2026
@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-08-03 15:24:54

Comparing candidate commit b15e9f2 in PR branch andrew/fix-redis-update with baseline commit 3643d74 in branch master.

📊 Benchmarking dashboard

Found 0 performance improvements and 1 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 71 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 68 known flaky benchmarks, 58 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-5331.150op/s; -5069.202op/s] or [-6.086%; -5.787%]

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-8846.735op/s; -8337.983op/s] or [-10.490%; -9.886%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 throughput [-10278.142op/s; -8707.609op/s] or [-10.451%; -8.854%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+306.584ms; +314.663ms] or [+152.138%; +156.147%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-45.274op/s; -41.669op/s] or [-8.146%; -7.497%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+382.634ms; +383.548ms] or [+302.304%; +303.026%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+88.367op/s; +89.969op/s] or [+11.651%; +11.862%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+392.542ms; +394.192ms] or [+347.385%; +348.845%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+4.692KB; +4.693KB] or [+98.785%; +98.801%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-60046.307op/s; -59679.117op/s] or [-46.719%; -46.433%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.816KB; +3.816KB] or [+80.699%; +80.711%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-16.313ms; -12.144ms] or [-7.619%; -5.672%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-59956.088op/s; -57193.288op/s] or [-43.765%; -41.748%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+4.544KB; +4.544KB] or [+98.261%; +98.274%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-48305.376op/s; -46055.668op/s] or [-43.674%; -41.640%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.315KB; +1.315KB] or [+106.388%; +106.404%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-273826.635op/s; -268812.728op/s] or [-27.959%; -27.447%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+479 bytes; +480 bytes] or [+39.212%; +39.221%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-25.834ms; -20.928ms] or [-11.521%; -9.333%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-84485.740op/s; -58716.325op/s] or [-9.026%; -6.273%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.280KB; +1.280KB] or [+105.947%; +105.963%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-160831.695op/s; -144838.151op/s] or [-23.108%; -20.810%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.378KB; +3.378KB] or [+89.003%; +89.017%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-72796.667op/s; -71998.785op/s] or [-48.991%; -48.454%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.336KB; +3.336KB] or [+88.150%; +88.161%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-73530.924op/s; -70655.967op/s] or [-46.787%; -44.957%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.264KB; +3.264KB] or [+88.493%; +88.506%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-56482.281op/s; -53858.307op/s] or [-44.995%; -42.905%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+303188.855op/s; +325904.067op/s] or [+10.110%; +10.867%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-18.951ms; -14.615ms] or [-8.736%; -6.737%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.759KB; -13.756KB] or [-42.324%; -42.316%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.252ms; +300.166ms] or [+149.526%; +149.983%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+936.422op/s; +968.590op/s] or [+10.343%; +10.698%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.722KB; -13.718KB] or [-42.341%; -42.329%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.768ms; +311.216ms] or [+150.670%; +156.947%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+2198.428op/s; +2560.190op/s] or [+16.815%; +19.582%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.722KB; -13.718KB] or [-42.341%; -42.329%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.252ms; +302.613ms] or [+151.243%; +152.433%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1905.949op/s; +2033.445op/s] or [+18.401%; +19.632%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+296.972ms; +298.126ms] or [+145.861%; +146.428%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+538.280op/s; +563.135op/s] or [+14.270%; +14.929%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.875ms; +301.108ms] or [+146.109%; +147.200%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+2668.504op/s; +2706.704op/s] or [+38.768%; +39.323%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.496ms; +301.201ms] or [+150.188%; +150.540%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1455.748op/s; +1474.511op/s] or [+28.895%; +29.268%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472

  • 🟩 execution_time [-147.897µs; -142.395µs] or [-30.365%; -29.236%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+853.076op/s; +893.339op/s] or [+41.549%; +43.510%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-139.960µs; -113.342µs] or [-32.100%; -25.995%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+872.143op/s; +993.487op/s] or [+37.917%; +43.193%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-144.015µs; -122.033µs] or [-30.856%; -26.146%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+789.401op/s; +871.968op/s] or [+36.440%; +40.252%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472

  • 🟩 execution_time [-128.909µs; -124.591µs] or [-34.804%; -33.639%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1380.552op/s; +1431.639op/s] or [+51.129%; +53.021%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-102.552µs; -78.942µs] or [-32.740%; -25.202%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1186.844op/s; +1389.151op/s] or [+36.997%; +43.304%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-135.806µs; -113.058µs] or [-37.151%; -30.928%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1290.374op/s; +1438.946op/s] or [+46.306%; +51.638%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.964ms; +300.995ms] or [+149.713%; +150.228%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+410.493ms; +421.744ms] or [+446.018%; +458.243%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+756.233op/s; +964.378op/s] or [+6.214%; +7.924%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+201.350ms; +266.789ms] or [+152.883%; +202.570%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • unstable execution_time [+298.336ms; +372.156ms] or [+137.172%; +171.114%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-606.407op/s; -550.633op/s] or [-54.946%; -49.893%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+206.486ms; +339.757ms] or [+87.996%; +144.790%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-671.303op/s; -587.856op/s] or [-44.776%; -39.210%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+342.896ms; +352.268ms] or [+205.091%; +210.697%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-411.806op/s; -369.914op/s] or [-28.673%; -25.757%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-76.362µs; -60.925µs] or [-7.082%; -5.650%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+56.394op/s; +71.007op/s] or [+6.080%; +7.656%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable throughput [-10.105op/s; +63.746op/s] or [-1.886%; +11.899%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-172.891µs; -127.107µs] or [-8.758%; -6.439%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+36.279op/s; +49.063op/s] or [+7.162%; +9.685%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.546ms; +303.835ms] or [+152.357%; +153.005%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.040ms; +311.890ms] or [+150.350%; +156.288%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.989ms; +304.381ms] or [+151.204%; +152.908%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.222ms; +304.150ms] or [+151.766%; +152.734%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+296.664ms; +298.511ms] or [+146.687%; +147.601%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.696ms; +306.626ms] or [+153.420%; +155.412%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.311ms; +302.511ms] or [+151.231%; +151.833%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.524ms; +301.818ms] or [+149.285%; +150.429%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+59197.420op/s; +67588.955op/s] or [+11.755%; +13.421%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.562ms; +303.611ms] or [+149.527%; +151.044%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-17.278ms; -13.628ms] or [-8.035%; -6.337%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+26967.004op/s; +33699.783op/s] or [+7.398%; +9.245%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

  • unstable execution_time [-180.676µs; +731.667µs] or [-44.628%; +180.727%]
  • unstable throughput [-411.181op/s; -131.358op/s] or [-16.546%; -5.286%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-20.719KB; -20.697KB] or [-7.558%; -7.550%]
  • unstable execution_time [-18.938µs; +42.172µs] or [-3.743%; +8.335%]
  • unstable throughput [-145.273op/s; +64.442op/s] or [-7.249%; +3.216%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-67.514µs; -7.943µs] or [-11.700%; -1.377%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+6.924µs; +11.674µs] or [+16.367%; +27.595%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-5131.612op/s; -3205.281op/s] or [-21.602%; -13.493%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-12.608µs; -4.286µs] or [-19.560%; -6.650%]
  • unstable throughput [+1030.778op/s; +2853.358op/s] or [+6.324%; +17.506%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.990ms; +303.525ms] or [+152.643%; +153.418%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.002ms; +306.404ms] or [+154.736%; +155.958%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.589ms; +301.616ms] or [+149.981%; +150.996%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+44906.898op/s; +50608.813op/s] or [+8.500%; +9.579%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.552ms; +299.516ms] or [+148.303%; +149.282%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.447ms; +301.794ms] or [+150.870%; +151.547%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.605ms; +306.341ms] or [+153.969%; +155.356%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.898ms; +300.668ms] or [+149.591%; +149.975%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+66001624.432op/s; +66329790.176op/s] or [+48.066%; +48.305%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+425.663ms; +429.389ms] or [+529.388%; +534.022%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.707ms; +300.922ms] or [+149.487%; +150.093%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+89694.513op/s; +103621.059op/s] or [+8.374%; +9.675%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+88327.105op/s; +118129.687op/s] or [+6.837%; +9.143%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+72833.035op/s; +83356.672op/s] or [+7.233%; +8.279%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+49034.638op/s; +54149.141op/s] or [+8.904%; +9.833%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+25473.640op/s; +35171.625op/s] or [+5.702%; +7.873%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+51538.051op/s; +71086.456op/s] or [+5.758%; +7.942%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot Bot commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (8982) and master.

✅ No regressions detected - check the details below

Full Metrics Comparison

FakeDbCommand

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration71.41 ± (71.55 - 71.98) ms73.52 ± (73.54 - 74.10) ms+3.0%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration79.41 ± (78.78 - 79.27) ms75.56 ± (75.40 - 75.69) ms-4.8%✅
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1091.86 ± (1094.15 - 1103.52) ms1092.78 ± (1092.43 - 1099.51) ms+0.1%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms22.44 ± (22.39 - 22.49) ms22.18 ± (22.14 - 22.23) ms-1.2%✅
process.time_to_main_ms84.93 ± (84.63 - 85.23) ms83.09 ± (82.79 - 83.40) ms-2.2%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.00 ± (11.00 - 11.01) MB11.00 ± (11.00 - 11.01) MB-0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count12 ± (12 - 12)12 ± (12 - 12)+0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms22.14 ± (22.11 - 22.18) ms21.98 ± (21.95 - 22.01) ms-0.8%✅
process.time_to_main_ms83.81 ± (83.59 - 84.03) ms83.06 ± (82.89 - 83.24) ms-0.9%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.03 ± (11.03 - 11.04) MB11.04 ± (11.04 - 11.04) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count13 ± (13 - 13)13 ± (13 - 13)+0.0%✅
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms210.31 ± (209.42 - 211.20) ms209.68 ± (208.79 - 210.56) ms-0.3%✅
process.time_to_main_ms536.46 ± (535.20 - 537.72) ms541.39 ± (540.07 - 542.71) ms+0.9%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed49.58 ± (49.55 - 49.61) MB49.51 ± (49.48 - 49.54) MB-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)-0.1%✅
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms20.80 ± (20.77 - 20.83) ms20.96 ± (20.92 - 20.99) ms+0.7%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms71.01 ± (70.85 - 71.18) ms72.09 ± (71.85 - 72.32) ms+1.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.73 ± (10.73 - 10.73) MB10.72 ± (10.72 - 10.72) MB-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms20.72 ± (20.69 - 20.75) ms21.17 ± (21.12 - 21.22) ms+2.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms71.98 ± (71.84 - 72.12) ms75.68 ± (75.40 - 75.96) ms+5.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed10.85 ± (10.84 - 10.85) MB10.85 ± (10.84 - 10.85) MB-0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%✅
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms371.10 ± (368.94 - 373.25) ms371.16 ± (368.69 - 373.63) ms+0.0%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms542.48 ± (541.38 - 543.59) ms548.72 ± (547.51 - 549.93) ms+1.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed50.68 ± (50.66 - 50.70) MB50.69 ± (50.67 - 50.72) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count28 ± (28 - 28)28 ± (28 - 28)-0.0%✅
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms19.45 ± (19.41 - 19.49) ms19.00 ± (18.98 - 19.02) ms-2.3%✅
process.time_to_main_ms73.45 ± (73.20 - 73.69) ms70.13 ± (70.01 - 70.25) ms-4.5%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.76 ± (7.76 - 7.77) MB7.77 ± (7.77 - 7.78) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count10 ± (10 - 10)10 ± (10 - 10)+0.0%✅
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms19.25 ± (19.22 - 19.28) ms19.04 ± (19.00 - 19.07) ms-1.1%✅
process.time_to_main_ms72.76 ± (72.56 - 72.96) ms71.49 ± (71.36 - 71.62) ms-1.7%✅
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed7.83 ± (7.82 - 7.84) MB7.83 ± (7.82 - 7.84) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count11 ± (11 - 11)11 ± (11 - 11)+0.0%✅
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms298.13 ± (295.96 - 300.29) ms299.61 ± (297.27 - 301.95) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms493.03 ± (491.99 - 494.07) ms495.68 ± (494.50 - 496.85) ms+0.5%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count0 ± (0 - 0)0 ± (0 - 0)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed38.09 ± (38.06 - 38.12) MB38.11 ± (38.08 - 38.14) MB+0.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count27 ± (27 - 27)27 ± (27 - 27)-0.8%✅

HttpMessageHandler

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration206.48 ± (205.67 - 206.56) ms210.34 ± (210.12 - 210.91) ms+1.9%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration209.08 ± (208.71 - 209.61) ms213.37 ± (213.12 - 213.66) ms+2.1%✅⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1223.14 ± (1226.41 - 1234.63) ms1249.39 ± (1250.47 - 1256.92) ms+2.1%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms197.09 ± (196.81 - 197.38) ms200.77 ± (200.41 - 201.13) ms+1.9%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms86.14 ± (85.91 - 86.37) ms88.97 ± (88.74 - 89.21) ms+3.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.13 ± (16.10 - 16.16) MB16.18 ± (16.16 - 16.20) MB+0.3%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count20 ± (20 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)+0.6%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms196.56 ± (196.25 - 196.87) ms200.78 ± (200.44 - 201.13) ms+2.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms87.25 ± (87.11 - 87.39) ms89.95 ± (89.77 - 90.13) ms+3.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.18 ± (16.16 - 16.20) MB16.21 ± (16.19 - 16.24) MB+0.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count21 ± (21 - 21)21 ± (21 - 21)+1.1%✅⬆️
.NET Core 3.1 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms391.40 ± (390.05 - 392.75) ms397.60 ± (396.51 - 398.69) ms+1.6%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms550.76 ± (549.72 - 551.81) ms560.62 ± (559.33 - 561.91) ms+1.8%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count3 ± (3 - 3)3 ± (3 - 3)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed59.27 ± (59.06 - 59.47) MB59.82 ± (59.68 - 59.97) MB+0.9%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)+0.6%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms203.12 ± (202.82 - 203.42) ms206.02 ± (205.66 - 206.38) ms+1.4%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms75.93 ± (75.72 - 76.14) ms77.54 ± (77.35 - 77.73) ms+2.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.56 ± (16.54 - 16.59) MB16.50 ± (16.48 - 16.52) MB-0.4%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (19 - 20)+1.6%✅⬆️
.NET 6 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms202.31 ± (202.02 - 202.60) ms205.78 ± (205.44 - 206.12) ms+1.7%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms76.42 ± (76.29 - 76.54) ms78.69 ± (78.48 - 78.91) ms+3.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed16.56 ± (16.54 - 16.58) MB16.54 ± (16.51 - 16.56) MB-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count21 ± (20 - 21)20 ± (20 - 20)-0.7%✅
.NET 6 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms582.98 ± (580.14 - 585.82) ms578.89 ± (576.50 - 581.28) ms-0.7%✅
process.time_to_main_ms560.88 ± (559.82 - 561.94) ms575.67 ± (574.63 - 576.71) ms+2.6%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed61.61 ± (61.52 - 61.70) MB61.63 ± (61.55 - 61.71) MB+0.0%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.threads.count31 ± (31 - 31)31 ± (31 - 31)-0.7%✅
.NET 8 - Baseline
process.internal_duration_ms201.23 ± (200.91 - 201.56) ms206.34 ± (205.96 - 206.73) ms+2.5%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms74.96 ± (74.77 - 75.15) ms77.39 ± (77.16 - 77.63) ms+3.2%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.86 ± (11.84 - 11.89) MB11.79 ± (11.77 - 11.81) MB-0.6%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 19)19 ± (19 - 19)+1.5%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - Bailout
process.internal_duration_ms200.14 ± (199.83 - 200.46) ms204.55 ± (204.26 - 204.84) ms+2.2%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms75.97 ± (75.85 - 76.10) ms78.12 ± (77.99 - 78.24) ms+2.8%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed11.91 ± (11.89 - 11.93) MB11.86 ± (11.84 - 11.88) MB-0.4%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count19 ± (19 - 20)20 ± (20 - 20)+2.4%✅⬆️
.NET 8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
process.internal_duration_ms507.64 ± (504.62 - 510.66) ms513.32 ± (509.41 - 517.23) ms+1.1%✅⬆️
process.time_to_main_ms514.35 ± (513.54 - 515.16) ms524.95 ± (524.10 - 525.81) ms+2.1%✅⬆️
runtime.dotnet.exceptions.count4 ± (4 - 4)4 ± (4 - 4)+0.0%✅
runtime.dotnet.mem.committed51.52 ± (51.48 - 51.57) MB51.46 ± (51.42 - 51.50) MB-0.1%✅
runtime.dotnet.threads.count30 ± (30 - 30)30 ± (30 - 30)+0.0%✅⬆️
Comparison explanation

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program, and are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are highlighted in **red**. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

Duration charts
FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8982) - mean (74ms)  : 70, 78
    master - mean (72ms)  : 69, 75

    section Bailout
    This PR (8982) - mean (76ms)  : 74, 77
    master - mean (79ms)  : 75, 83

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8982) - mean (1,096ms)  : 1044, 1147
    master - mean (1,099ms)  : 1029, 1168
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8982) - mean (112ms)  : 105, 119
    master - mean (115ms)  : 109, 120

    section Bailout
    This PR (8982) - mean (112ms)  : 110, 114
    master - mean (113ms)  : 108, 117

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8982) - mean (788ms)  : 759, 818
    master - mean (783ms)  : 760, 807
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 6) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8982) - mean (99ms)  : 94, 104
    master - mean (98ms)  : 94, 102

    section Bailout
    This PR (8982) - mean (104ms)  : 97, 110
    master - mean (99ms)  : 97, 100

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8982) - mean (951ms)  : 898, 1005
    master - mean (943ms)  : 900, 987
Loading
FakeDbCommand (.NET 8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8982) - mean (96ms)  : 93, 99
    master - mean (100ms)  : 94, 106

    section Bailout
    This PR (8982) - mean (97ms)  : 95, 100
    master - mean (99ms)  : 95, 104

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8982) - mean (824ms)  : 784, 863
    master - mean (819ms)  : 781, 857
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8982) - mean (211ms)  : 207, 214
    master - mean (206ms)  : 202, 210

    section Bailout
    This PR (8982) - mean (213ms)  : 211, 216
    master - mean (209ms)  : 204, 214

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8982) - mean (1,254ms)  : 1208, 1300
    master - mean (1,231ms)  : 1172, 1289
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8982) - mean (300ms)  : 296, 305
    master - mean (293ms)  : 287, 298

    section Bailout
    This PR (8982) - mean (301ms)  : 295, 306
    master - mean (293ms)  : 289, 297

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8982) - mean (998ms)  : 983, 1013
    master - mean (981ms)  : 954, 1008
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8982) - mean (293ms)  : 288, 299
    master - mean (288ms)  : 283, 292

    section Bailout
    This PR (8982) - mean (294ms)  : 289, 299
    master - mean (288ms)  : 284, 291

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8982) - mean (1,191ms)  : 1152, 1229
    master - mean (1,173ms)  : 1143, 1203
Loading
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8) 
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
    dateFormat  x
    axisFormat %Q
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (8982) - mean (295ms)  : 289, 300
    master - mean (286ms)  : 282, 291

    section Bailout
    This PR (8982) - mean (293ms)  : 290, 297
    master - mean (286ms)  : 281, 291

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (8982) - mean (1,073ms)  : 1016, 1129
    master - mean (1,054ms)  : 1006, 1102
Loading

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@bouwkast bouwkast bouwkast approved these changes
@vandonr vandonr Awaiting requested review from vandonr vandonr is a code owner automatically assigned from DataDog/apm-idm-dotnet

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

area:dependabot dependabot updates area:tests unit tests, integration tests dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@andrewlock @bouwkast