Skip to content

feat(dogstatsd)!: add shared_runtime buffered sink#2224

Open
VianneyRuhlmann wants to merge 1 commit into
vianney/statsd-client-refactorfrom
07-10-feat_dogstatsd_add_shared_runtime_buffered_sink
Open

feat(dogstatsd)!: add shared_runtime buffered sink#2224
VianneyRuhlmann wants to merge 1 commit into
vianney/statsd-client-refactorfrom
07-10-feat_dogstatsd_add_shared_runtime_buffered_sink

Conversation

@VianneyRuhlmann

@VianneyRuhlmann VianneyRuhlmann commented Jul 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Provide a SharedRuntime based buffered sink. The current QueuingMetricSink spawns a thread which isn't forksafe. This provides an alternative that can be used in forking context.

Motivation

Currently the dogstatsd client doesn't survive a fork and all metrics submitted after the fork are never sent.

Additional Notes

Anything else we should know when reviewing?

How to test the change?

Describe here in detail how the change can be validated.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📚 Documentation Check Results

⚠️ 1373 documentation warning(s) found

📦 libdd-data-pipeline - 1204 warning(s)

📦 libdd-dogstatsd-client - 169 warning(s)


Updated: 2026-07-13 14:03:49 UTC | Commit: 78f1046 | missing-docs job results

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Clippy Allow Annotation Report

Comparing clippy allow annotations between branches:

Summary by Rule

Rule Base Branch PR Branch Change
unwrap_used 2 2 No change (0%)
Total 2 2 No change (0%)

Annotation Counts by File

File Base Branch PR Branch Change
libdd-data-pipeline/src/trace_exporter/mod.rs 2 2 No change (0%)

Annotation Stats by Crate

Crate Base Branch PR Branch Change
clippy-annotation-reporter 5 5 No change (0%)
datadog-ffe-ffi 1 1 No change (0%)
datadog-ipc 22 22 No change (0%)
datadog-live-debugger 4 4 No change (0%)
datadog-live-debugger-ffi 10 10 No change (0%)
datadog-profiling-replayer 4 4 No change (0%)
datadog-sidecar 45 45 No change (0%)
libdd-common 13 13 No change (0%)
libdd-common-ffi 12 12 No change (0%)
libdd-data-pipeline 6 6 No change (0%)
libdd-ddsketch 2 2 No change (0%)
libdd-profiling 13 13 No change (0%)
libdd-remote-config 3 3 No change (0%)
libdd-telemetry 20 20 No change (0%)
libdd-tinybytes 4 4 No change (0%)
libdd-trace-normalization 2 2 No change (0%)
libdd-trace-obfuscation 3 3 No change (0%)
libdd-trace-stats 1 1 No change (0%)
libdd-trace-utils 11 11 No change (0%)
Total 181 181 No change (0%)

About This Report

This report tracks Clippy allow annotations for specific rules, showing how they've changed in this PR. Decreasing the number of these annotations generally improves code quality.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔒 Cargo Deny Results

⚠️ 4 issue(s) found, showing only errors (advisories, bans, sources)

📦 libdd-data-pipeline - 3 error(s)

Show output
error[vulnerability]: Invalid pointer dereference in `fmt::Pointer` impl for `Atomic` and `Shared` when the underlying pointer is invalid
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:75:1
   │
75 │ crossbeam-epoch 0.9.18 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0204
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0204
   ├ Affected versions of `fmt::Display` dereference the underlying pointer. This causes a invalid pointer dereference e.g., when a pointer created with `Atomic::null` or `Shared::null`. `fmt::Debug` impls and pre-0.9 `fmt::Display` impls, which do not dereference pointers, are not affected by this issue.
   ├ Announcement: https://github.com/crossbeam-rs/crossbeam/pull/1276
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.9.20 (try `cargo update -p crossbeam-epoch`)
   ├ crossbeam-epoch v0.9.18
     └── crossbeam-deque v0.8.5
         └── rayon-core v1.12.1
             └── rayon v1.10.0
                 └── criterion v0.5.1
                     ├── libdd-common v5.1.0
                     │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v3.0.0
                     │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0
                     │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v2.0.0
                     │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
                     │   │   │   ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v4.0.0
                     │   │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
                     │   │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0
                     │   │   │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
                     │   │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v6.0.0
                     │   │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
                     │   │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
                     │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
                     │   │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
                     │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0
                     │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
                     │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v5.0.0
                     │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
                     │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
                     │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)
                     │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
                     │   ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v4.0.0 (*)
                     │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v2.0.0 (*)
                     │   ├── libdd-telemetry v6.0.0 (*)
                     │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v5.0.0 (*)
                     │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
                     │   └── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)
                     ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
                     ├── (dev) libdd-ddsketch v1.1.0
                     │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
                     │   ├── libdd-telemetry v6.0.0 (*)
                     │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
                     ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v3.0.0
                     │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
                     │   └── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)
                     ├── (dev) libdd-trace-obfuscation v5.0.0 (*)
                     ├── (dev) libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
                     └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:218:1
    │
218 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── libdd-common v5.1.0
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v3.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v2.0.0
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v4.0.0
      │   │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0
      │   │   │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v6.0.0
      │   │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v5.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v4.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v2.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry v6.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-ddsketch v1.1.0
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry v6.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v3.0.0
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-stats v6.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
              ├── libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0 (*)
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v9.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Denial of Service via Stack Exhaustion
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:287:1
    │
287 │ time 0.3.41 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ ## Impact
      
      When user-provided input is provided to any type that parses with the RFC 2822 format, a denial of
      service attack via stack exhaustion is possible. The attack relies on formally deprecated and
      rarely-used features that are part of the RFC 2822 format used in a malicious manner. Ordinary,
      non-malicious input will never encounter this scenario.
      
      ## Patches
      
      A limit to the depth of recursion was added in v0.3.47. From this version, an error will be returned
      rather than exhausting the stack.
      
      ## Workarounds
      
      Limiting the length of user input is the simplest way to avoid stack exhaustion, as the amount of
      the stack consumed would be at most a factor of the length of the input.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/time-rs/time/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#0347-2026-02-05
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.3.47 (try `cargo update -p time`)
    ├ time v0.3.41
      └── tracing-appender v0.2.3
          └── libdd-log v1.0.0
              └── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v7.0.0

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 libdd-dogstatsd-client - 1 error(s)

Show output
error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:77:1
   │
77 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
   ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
     
     - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
     - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
     - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
     - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
     - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
     
     `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
   ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
   ├ rand v0.8.5
     └── (dev) libdd-common v5.1.0
         ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v3.0.0
         │   └── libdd-shared-runtime v2.0.0
         │       └── libdd-dogstatsd-client v4.0.0
         ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v4.0.0 (*)
         └── libdd-shared-runtime v2.0.0 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

Updated: 2026-07-13 14:04:58 UTC | Commit: 78f1046 | dependency-check job results

@datadog-prod-us1-6

datadog-prod-us1-6 Bot commented Jul 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tests

🎉 All green!

🧪 All tests passed
❄️ No new flaky tests detected

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
Patch Coverage: 79.09%
Overall Coverage: 74.53% (+0.05%)

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: b3d9cd0 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jul 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Artifact Size Benchmark Report

aarch64-alpine-linux-musl
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/aarch64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so 7.88 MB 7.88 MB +0% (+96 B) 👌
/aarch64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a 85.88 MB 86.10 MB +.25% (+221.08 KB) 🔍
aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so 10.61 MB 10.62 MB +.08% (+9.60 KB) 🔍
/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a 97.10 MB 97.33 MB +.23% (+231.15 KB) 🔍
libdatadog-x64-windows
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll 25.45 MB 25.53 MB +.32% (+85.00 KB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 88.44 KB 88.44 KB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb 184.55 MB 185.30 MB +.40% (+760.00 KB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 946.77 MB 950.66 MB +.41% (+3.89 MB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll 8.32 MB 8.35 MB +.30% (+26.00 KB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 88.44 KB 88.44 KB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb 24.62 MB 24.66 MB +.19% (+48.00 KB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 49.03 MB 49.15 MB +.24% (+123.20 KB) 🔍
libdatadog-x86-windows
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll 22.05 MB 22.13 MB +.35% (+80.00 KB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 89.82 KB 89.82 KB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb 188.76 MB 189.55 MB +.42% (+816.00 KB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 935.45 MB 939.34 MB +.41% (+3.89 MB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll 6.43 MB 6.45 MB +.26% (+17.50 KB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 89.82 KB 89.82 KB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb 26.43 MB 26.49 MB +.23% (+64.00 KB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 46.66 MB 46.77 MB +.23% (+114.19 KB) 🔍
x86_64-alpine-linux-musl
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/x86_64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a 76.58 MB 76.77 MB +.24% (+195.25 KB) 🔍
/x86_64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so 8.78 MB 8.80 MB +.22% (+20.09 KB) 🔍
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a 92.10 MB 92.30 MB +.21% (+201.35 KB) 🔍
/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so 10.69 MB 10.72 MB +.28% (+31.59 KB) 🔍

@VianneyRuhlmann VianneyRuhlmann force-pushed the 07-10-feat_dogstatsd_add_shared_runtime_buffered_sink branch from 8eb7bc6 to fed7da4 Compare July 10, 2026 14:05
@VianneyRuhlmann VianneyRuhlmann force-pushed the vianney/statsd-client-refactor branch from 597364e to b905f96 Compare July 10, 2026 14:05
@VianneyRuhlmann VianneyRuhlmann force-pushed the 07-10-feat_dogstatsd_add_shared_runtime_buffered_sink branch from fed7da4 to 7bafd9b Compare July 10, 2026 14:11
@VianneyRuhlmann VianneyRuhlmann force-pushed the vianney/statsd-client-refactor branch from b905f96 to 30d94f8 Compare July 10, 2026 14:11
@VianneyRuhlmann VianneyRuhlmann marked this pull request as ready for review July 10, 2026 14:38
@VianneyRuhlmann VianneyRuhlmann requested review from a team as code owners July 10, 2026 14:38
@VianneyRuhlmann VianneyRuhlmann changed the title feat(dogstatsd): add shared_runtime buffered sink feat(dogstatsd)!: add shared_runtime buffered sink Jul 10, 2026

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 7bafd9bcfa

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread libdd-dogstatsd-client/src/client/shared_runtime_sink.rs Outdated
Comment thread libdd-dogstatsd-client/Cargo.toml Outdated
tracing = { version = "0.1", default-features = false }
anyhow = { version = "1.0" }
http = "1.1"
libdd-shared-runtime = { version = "2.0.0", path = "../libdd-shared-runtime", optional = true }

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Preserve FIPS feature wiring for shared runtime

With this optional dependency using default features, enabling shared-runtime also enables libdd-shared-runtime's default https feature, and libdd-dogstatsd-client's fips feature only reaches its direct libdd-common dependency. In a --no-default-features --features shared-runtime,fips build this pulls the shared runtime's non-FIPS HTTPS stack instead of propagating libdd-shared-runtime/fips, unlike the other crates in this workspace that depend on the shared runtime with default-features = false and wire both https and fips through.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Jul 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Comparison

Benchmark execution time: 2026-07-13 14:35:41

Comparing candidate commit b3d9cd0 in PR branch 07-10-feat_dogstatsd_add_shared_runtime_buffered_sink with baseline commit 395fb45 in branch vianney/statsd-client-refactor.

Found 0 performance improvements and 7 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 135 metrics, 0 unstable metrics.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:normalization/normalize_name/normalize_name/good

  • 🟥 execution_time [+583.942ns; +637.153ns] or [+5.384%; +5.874%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-5150625.840op/s; -4717631.565op/s] or [-5.585%; -5.116%]

scenario:profiles_dictionary/profile_string_inserts/threads/1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+18.647µs; +20.621µs] or [+6.216%; +6.873%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-220398.497op/s; -198971.510op/s] or [-6.457%; -5.829%]

scenario:vec_map/as_deduped_map/needs_dedup_1_in_10/8

  • 🟥 execution_time [+25.436ns; +25.746ns] or [+7.016%; +7.101%]

scenario:vec_map/as_deduped_map/needs_dedup_1_in_2/8

  • 🟥 execution_time [+36.115ns; +36.374ns] or [+7.764%; +7.820%]

scenario:vec_map/as_deduped_map/needs_dedup_1_in_4/8

  • 🟥 execution_time [+34.813ns; +35.063ns] or [+8.765%; +8.828%]

Benchmark execution time: 2026-07-13 14:51:00

Comparing candidate commit b3d9cd0 in PR branch 07-10-feat_dogstatsd_add_shared_runtime_buffered_sink with baseline commit 395fb45 in branch vianney/statsd-client-refactor.

Found 0 performance improvements and 5 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 172 metrics, 10 unstable metrics.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:alloc_free/sampled_system_slow_path/4096

  • 🟥 execution_time [+11.795ns; +11.917ns] or [+7.554%; +7.632%]

scenario:glob_matcher/ascii_pattern_unicode_subject/wall_time

  • 🟥 execution_time [+9.839ns; +10.006ns] or [+7.133%; +7.255%]

scenario:receiver_entry_point/report/2644

  • 🟥 execution_time [+331.449µs; +350.741µs] or [+9.239%; +9.776%]

scenario:trace_buffer/4_senders/no_delay

  • 🟥 execution_time [+189.528µs; +218.868µs] or [+8.308%; +9.594%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-141220.672op/s; -121377.551op/s] or [-8.935%; -7.680%]

Candidate

Omitted due to size.

Baseline

Omitted due to size.

@VianneyRuhlmann VianneyRuhlmann force-pushed the 07-10-feat_dogstatsd_add_shared_runtime_buffered_sink branch from 7bafd9b to 8f5b1cf Compare July 10, 2026 15:02
@VianneyRuhlmann VianneyRuhlmann requested a review from a team as a code owner July 10, 2026 15:02
@VianneyRuhlmann VianneyRuhlmann force-pushed the 07-10-feat_dogstatsd_add_shared_runtime_buffered_sink branch 2 times, most recently from 0e35cfd to 59810b1 Compare July 13, 2026 12:16
@VianneyRuhlmann VianneyRuhlmann force-pushed the vianney/statsd-client-refactor branch from 30d94f8 to 395fb45 Compare July 13, 2026 12:16
@VianneyRuhlmann VianneyRuhlmann force-pushed the 07-10-feat_dogstatsd_add_shared_runtime_buffered_sink branch from 59810b1 to b3d9cd0 Compare July 13, 2026 14:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant