Did you test this change?

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 94.98%. Comparing base (4c3ecd6) to head (a5e5036).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on dev.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev    #1473      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.95%   94.98%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         157      158       +1     
  Lines        6144     6187      +43     
  Branches      350      350              
==========================================
+ Hits         5834     5877      +43     
  Misses        248      248              
  Partials       62       62              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sorry for the late reply — I was on vacation and just got back to this.

Yes, I tested all of this on my physical Deebot X5 PRO OMNI device and verified sensor readings against the official Ecovacs app.

Testing process:

1. Started with the X8 PRO definition as the base, since the X5 PRO OMNI shares most capabilities with it. Ran a full test of all capabilities — clean, charge, fan speed, map, life span, station, settings, stats, etc. All readings matched the app.

2. During testing, I found that water_amount on the X5 PRO OMNI uses discrete levels (LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH) rather than a continuous slider like the X8 PRO. The level count matched the X2's implementation exactly.

3. Merged CapabilityWater from the X2 definition, then re-tested the water module independently — water amount switching and mop_attached status both worked correctly and matched the app.

All capabilities defined in this PR have been verified on real hardware.

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 113 untouched benchmarks

_{Comparing genelee26:dev (a5e5036) with dev (4c3ecd6)}