Split WaterInfoEvent into multiple

[edenhaus]

A different approach for #905

@nanomad What do you think about this approach?

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR refactors water event handling by splitting the original WaterInfoEvent into separate events for water amount, mop attachment, and sweeping type. The changes include updating imports and replacing old event types in hardware modules and related capabilities, as well as introducing the new CapabilityWater abstraction.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 31 out of 31 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
deebot_client/hardware/deebot/*.py	Updated water event handling to use CapabilityWater and separate water_info events.
deebot_client/events/water_info.py	Removed the combined WaterInfoEvent and introduced separate ValueEvent types.
deebot_client/commands/json/water_info.py	Split aggregated water event notifications into individual events.
deebot_client/capabilities.py	Replaced WaterInfoEvent usage with the new CapabilityWater type.
Other hardware and init files	Updated corresponding imports and usage to align with the new event separation.

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

deebot_client/commands/json/water_info.py:38

• Ensure that tests are updated to verify that the split water events (WaterAmountEvent, MopAttachedEvent, and WaterSweepTypeEvent) are triggered correctly, reflecting the removal of the aggregated WaterInfoEvent.

event_bus.notify(WaterAmountEvent(WaterAmount(int(data["amount"]))));

[nanomad]

LGTM, I'll try and rebase my Water commands and messages on top on this and see if it works

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.46%. Comparing base (813daea) to head (f489d58).
Report is 2 commits behind head on dev.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev     #917   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.46%   92.46%           
=======================================
  Files         121      121           
  Lines        4644     4648    +4     
  Branches      292      292           
=======================================
+ Hits         4294     4298    +4     
  Misses        288      288           
  Partials       62       62           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #917 will not alter performance

_{Comparing split-WaterInfoEvent (f489d58) with dev (76b0d47)}

Summary

✅ 6 untouched benchmarks

[nanomad]

@edenhaus works for me, I'll open a PR as soon as this is merged