Add Support for DEEBOT X9 PRO OMNI (ilt3k8)

[thetechnikfreak]

No description provided.

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR begins support for the DEEBOT X9 PRO OMNI by adding a new integration module file.

• Introduces a new module ilt3k8.py under deebot_client/hardware/deebot/
• Currently contains only a placeholder line

[Copilot]

The file currently contains only a nonsensical placeholder line. Remove this placeholder and implement the actual device integration logic or add a clear TODO.

Suggested change

	5xu9h3.py
	# TODO: Implement the device integration logic for the ILT3K8 hardware.
	# This should include communication protocols, data parsing, and any
	# necessary hardware-specific functionality.

[flubshi]

As you mentioned in #1000, not all features of your DEEBOT X9 PRO OMNI are working with the linked capability file. Thus, we shouldn't link ilt3k8 to 5xu9h3.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 93.65%. Comparing base (7dab5cb) to head (ca24fc7).
⚠️ Report is 82 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev     #997   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.65%   93.65%           
=======================================
  Files         129      129           
  Lines        5012     5012           
  Branches      327      327           
=======================================
  Hits         4694     4694           
  Misses        258      258           
  Partials       60       60           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #997 will not alter performance

_{Comparing thetechnikfreak:dev (ca24fc7) with dev (7dab5cb)}

Summary

✅ 6 untouched benchmarks

[edenhaus]

As you mentioned in #1000, not all features of your DEEBOT X9 PRO OMNI are working with the linked capability file. Thus, we shouldn't link ilt3k8 to 5xu9h3.

@thetechnikfreak Can you please answer to this comment

[thetechnikfreak]

Sorry for not answering I just accepted the answer which makes sense and I'm Waiting until the port for the X8 PRO OMNI is out which seems to have the same API as mine

[ratoaq2]

X8 seems to be merged

[Crocmagnon]

Since #1102 has been merged, this can likely be closed.