You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: src/content/blog/fortitoken-alternative-vpn-mfa.mdx
+8-5Lines changed: 8 additions & 5 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -1,9 +1,11 @@
1
-
---
1
+
---
2
2
title: "Security shouldn't cost extra — MFA isn't an add-on"
3
+
seoTitle: "FortiToken Alternative: Why Legacy VPNs Overcharge for MFA"
3
4
publishDate: 2025-11-05
4
-
description: "MFA is mandatory under frameworks like NIS2. See why legacy VPNs sell it as an add-on, how that creates cost and risk, and how Defguard builds it in by default."
5
+
description: "Stop paying the 'security tax.' Legacy VPNs like Fortinet treat MFA as a costly add-on. See how Defguard's built-in MFA (a FortiToken alternative) meets NIS2."

@@ -131,8 +133,8 @@ Yes. Defguard, as a modern WireGuard®-based platform, includes MFA by default
131
133
"@graph": [
132
134
{
133
135
"@type": "BlogPosting",
134
-
"headline": "Security shouldn't cost extra — MFA isn't an add-on",
135
-
"description": "MFA is mandatory under frameworks like NIS2. Learn why legacy VPNs sell it as an add-on and how Defguard builds it in by default.",
136
+
"headline": "FortiToken Alternative: Why Legacy VPNs Overcharge for MFA",
137
+
"description": "Stop paying the security tax. Legacy VPNs like Fortinet treat MFA as a costly add-on. See how Defguard's built-in MFA meets NIS2 compliance.",
0 commit comments