Skip to content

feat(helm): DRY cloudsql-proxy#13369

Merged
mtesauro merged 1 commit intoDefectDojo:devfrom
kiblik:helm_dry_cloudsqlProxy
Oct 11, 2025
Merged

feat(helm): DRY cloudsql-proxy#13369
mtesauro merged 1 commit intoDefectDojo:devfrom
kiblik:helm_dry_cloudsqlProxy

Conversation

@kiblik
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@kiblik kiblik commented Oct 7, 2025

cloudsql-proxy is always the same. Let's DRY (Don't repeat yourself) it.

@kiblik
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

kiblik commented Oct 7, 2025

@fernandezcuesta, could you please check it?

@kiblik kiblik force-pushed the helm_dry_cloudsqlProxy branch from 075a61b to d73a51b Compare October 7, 2025 18:30
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mtesauro mtesauro left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved

@mtesauro mtesauro requested a review from rossops October 8, 2025 01:10
@valentijnscholten valentijnscholten added this to the 2.52.0 milestone Oct 8, 2025
@Maffooch
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@kiblik I will leave to you to merge in case you would want @fernandezcuesta to look closer before it goes in

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@fernandezcuesta fernandezcuesta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM
Little bit weird that the function returns a list rather than a map, something like:

- {{- include "foo" . | nindent 6 }}

Where you can visually see it's a single container.
But I feel it's just my own personal bias. Other than that it does its job!

@mtesauro
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Based on the feedback above ☝️ I'm going to go ahead and merge this.

@mtesauro mtesauro merged commit f61e3aa into DefectDojo:dev Oct 11, 2025
148 checks passed
@kiblik kiblik deleted the helm_dry_cloudsqlProxy branch October 11, 2025 17:16
Maffooch pushed a commit to valentijnscholten/django-DefectDojo that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants