register Goblin RWA token on Pharos

[ericEnjoy]

This is an RWA token registered on Phraos by Goblin, issued using ERC-4626.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Added support for the Goblin protocol.
  • Added TVL tracking for Goblin’s Pharos vaults using the defined methodology.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 0cb272ec-0e35-478a-9c12-7f1da5807878

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ecc5f22 and 9c8e3e8.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• registries/erc4626.js

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The ERC-4626 registry adds a goblin protocol entry with a Pharos vault mapping and methodology description. Existing export wiring remains unchanged.

Changes

Goblin registry configuration

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Add Goblin protocol configuration registries/erc4626.js	Adds the goblin configuration with the GoblinPrivateCreditI Pharos vault and TVL methodology text.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The description is too brief and omits the required new-listing fields from the template, such as name, chain, website, methodology, and token details.	Fill in the new-listing template sections with the required protocol details, links, token info, methodology, and any relevant audit/oracle data.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly matches the main change: registering Goblin's RWA token on Pharos.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[github-actions]

The adapter at goblin exports TVL:

pharos                    6.49 M

total                    6.49 M 

[RohanNero]

Hello, thank you for the PR. I have a couple of questions/notes:

1. The vault returns the null address for asset(), so totalAssets() is being added to balances as PROS token. Is this accurate, or should it be USDC?
2. I didn't see USDC being transferred when GPCI was minted, is it sent in a separate transaction?: https://www.pharosscan.xyz/tx/0xb7b1c11f7e4c8140e5833fd249328c64cec928ff6ec471e75ae130f60b778990
3. If the backing for GPCI is offchain, could you please fill out one of our RWA submission forms instead?:
   • main: https://forms.defillama.com/rwa-submission
   • backup: https://forms.gle/CgM2tPaFfpK2KK7p8

[ericEnjoy]

Hello, thank you for the PR. I have a couple of questions/notes:

1. The vault returns the null address for asset(), so totalAssets() is being added to balances as PROS token. Is this accurate, or should it be USDC?

2. I didn't see USDC being transferred when GPCI was minted, is it sent in a separate transaction?: https://www.pharosscan.xyz/tx/0xb7b1c11f7e4c8140e5833fd249328c64cec928ff6ec471e75ae130f60b778990

3. If the backing for GPCI is offchain, could you please fill out one of our RWA submission forms instead?:

   • main: https://forms.defillama.com/rwa-submission
   • backup: https://forms.gle/CgM2tPaFfpK2KK7p8
     Thanks for the reply.

1. It's USDC, and it is backed by offchain assets.
2. We have already submit the form, but have no idea how to related to this PR.