fix(test): use __SANITIZE_ADDRESS__ alone for sanitizer detection (gcc-portable)

GCC's preprocessor doesn't short-circuit 'defined(__has_feature) && __has_feature(...)' — it tries to parse the call syntax of the undefined token and errors with 'missing binary operator before token "("'. Modern GCC and Clang both define __SANITIZE_ADDRESS__ under -fsanitize=address, so use that single check.

Author: DeusData

tests/test_cs_lsp_bench.c

@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ TEST(cslsp_bench_resolution_ratio) {
     /* Time budget. ASan+UBSan instrumentation slows the parse ~5-10×, so
      * scale the budget when a sanitizer is active. Native: 200 ms for a
      * ~260-line fixture; sanitized: 2000 ms. */
-#if defined(__SANITIZE_ADDRESS__) || (defined(__has_feature) && __has_feature(address_sanitizer))
+#ifdef __SANITIZE_ADDRESS__
     ASSERT(ms < 2000.0);
 #else
     ASSERT(ms < 200.0);

tests/test_py_lsp_bench.c

@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ TEST(pylsp_bench_resolution_ratio) {
     /* Time budget. ASan+UBSan instrumentation slows the parse ~5-10×, so
      * scale the budget when a sanitizer is active. Native: 150 ms for a
      * ~200-line fixture; sanitized: 1500 ms. */
-#if defined(__SANITIZE_ADDRESS__) || (defined(__has_feature) && __has_feature(address_sanitizer))
+#ifdef __SANITIZE_ADDRESS__
     ASSERT(ms < 1500.0);
 #else
     ASSERT(ms < 150.0);