Currently, errors from the worker are prefixed with use-dcp-worker: <error from worker>. Some folks have been finding that confusing, thinking that it's a bug with use-dcp-worker rather than with the worker or its configuration.
I think leaving the error reporting to the worker itself instead of trying to wrap the error handling would simplify the issue, leaving control over error handling to application developers.
Currently, errors from the worker are prefixed with
use-dcp-worker: <error from worker>. Some folks have been finding that confusing, thinking that it's a bug withuse-dcp-workerrather than with the worker or its configuration.I think leaving the error reporting to the worker itself instead of trying to wrap the error handling would simplify the issue, leaving control over error handling to application developers.