Skip to content

Commit 4d29976

Browse files
committed
Deploy from jjohare/logseq @ b6b3b4c0926c941ccb05a78bda992f3fc4a214e1 jjohare/logseq@b6b3b4c
1 parent d26c51e commit 4d29976

830 files changed

Lines changed: 12981 additions & 12981 deletions

File tree

Some content is hidden

Large Commits have some content hidden by default. Use the searchbox below for content that may be hidden.

api/pages/pages/51% Attack.json

Lines changed: 6 additions & 6 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -8,14 +8,14 @@
88
],
99
"wiki_links": [
1010
"NIST NISTIR",
11-
"Jailbreaking",
12-
"SecurityLayer",
13-
"IEEE 2418.1",
14-
"CryptographicDomain",
1511
"NetworkComponent",
16-
"Open Generative AI tools",
12+
"CryptographicDomain",
13+
"SecurityLayer",
1714
"ISO/IEC 23257:2021",
18-
"Blockchain Entity"
15+
"Jailbreaking",
16+
"Open Generative AI tools",
17+
"Blockchain Entity",
18+
"IEEE 2418.1"
1919
],
2020
"ontology": {
2121
"term_id": "BC-0077",

api/pages/pages/6G Network Slice.json

Lines changed: 12 additions & 12 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -4,25 +4,25 @@
44
"content": "- ### OntologyBlock\n id:: 6g-network-slice-ontology\n collapsed:: true\n\t- ontology:: true\n\t- term-id:: 20140\n\t- preferred-term:: 6G Network Slice\n\t- public-access:: true\n\t- definition:: Virtual partition of 6G infrastructure guaranteeing specified quality-of-service levels for immersive workloads through isolated resource allocation.\n\t- source:: [[3GPP Release 21]], [[ETSI ENI 008]]\n\t- maturity:: draft\n\t- owl:class:: mv:SixGNetworkSlice\n\t- owl:physicality:: VirtualEntity\n\t- owl:role:: Object\n\t- owl:inferred-class:: mv:VirtualObject\n\t- owl:functional-syntax:: true\n\t- belongsToDomain:: [[InfrastructureDomain]]\n\t- implementedInLayer:: [[NetworkLayer]]\n\t- #### Relationships\n\t id:: 6g-network-slice-relationships\n\t collapsed:: true\n\t\t- has-part:: [[Service Level Agreement]]\n\t\t- has-part:: [[Resource Allocation Unit]]\n\t\t- has-part:: [[Traffic Classifier]]\n\t\t- has-part:: [[QoS Policy]]\n\t\t- requires:: [[6G Network Infrastructure]]\n\t\t- requires:: [[Network Slicing Orchestrator]]\n\t\t- requires:: [[SDN Controller]]\n\t\t- enables:: [[Dynamic Resource Allocation]]\n\t\t- enables:: [[Low Latency Service]]\n\t\t- enables:: [[Workload Isolation]]\n\t\t- enables:: [[Guaranteed Bandwidth]]\n\t\t- related-to:: [[Network Slice]]\n\t\t- related-to:: [[Virtual Network]]\n\t\t- related-to:: [[Network Function Virtualization]]\n\t\t- related-to:: [[5G Network Slice]]\n\n## 6G Network Slice\n\n6G Network Slice refers to virtual partition of 6g infrastructure guaranteeing specified quality-of-service levels for immersive workloads through isolated resource allocation.\n\n- Industry adoption and implementations\n\t- Major telecom equipment vendors and operators are actively developing 6G slicing prototypes and testbeds\n\t- Notable organisations and platforms\n\t\t- Ericsson, Nokia, and Huawei are leading in 6G research and development, with ongoing collaborations with academic institutions\n\t\t- The UK’s 6G Innovation Centre (6GIC) at the University of Surrey is a key hub for 6G research, including slicing technologies\n\t- UK and North England examples where relevant\n\t\t- The Northern 5G (N5G) project, spanning Manchester, Leeds, and Newcastle, is exploring advanced network slicing for smart city and industrial applications\n\t\t- Sheffield’s Advanced Manufacturing Research Centre (AMRC) is piloting slicing for immersive industrial workloads, such as remote maintenance and digital twinning\n- Technical capabilities and limitations\n\t- 6G slicing is expected to support ultra-low latency (sub-millisecond), massive connectivity, and highly customisable quality-of-service (QoS) guarantees\n\t- Current limitations include the complexity of cross-domain orchestration, security challenges, and the need for robust standards\n- Standards and frameworks\n\t- The 3GPP is developing 6G slicing specifications, with a focus on interoperability and security\n\t- The European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) is also contributing to 6G slicing standards, particularly in the context of cross-border and multi-operator scenarios\n\n## Research & Literature\n\n- Key academic papers and sources\n\t- Uusitalo, M., Chaffer, K., & Ladid, L. (2025). Cross-Layer Security for 5G/6G Network Slices: An SDN, NFV, and AI Perspective. Sensors, 25(11), 3335. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25113335\n\t- Ericsson. (2025). 6G: The Next Generation of Cellular Networks. Ericsson White Paper. https://www.ericsson.com/en/6g\n\t- Pereira, J., & Ladid, L. (2025). Symposium on 6G Communications. IEEE FNWF 2025. https://fnwf2025.ieee.org/symposium-6g-communications\n- Ongoing research directions\n\t- AI-driven orchestration and automation of network slices\n\t- Cross-layer security and privacy for slicing\n\t- Integration of sensing and communication in 6G slicing\n\n## UK Context\n\n- British contributions and implementations\n\t- The UK is a leader in 6G research, with significant government and industry investment in 6G slicing technologies\n\t- The 6GIC at the University of Surrey is a world-renowned centre for 6G research, including slicing\n- North England innovation hubs (if relevant)\n\t- The N5G project is a major initiative in North England, focusing on advanced network slicing for smart cities and industrial applications\n\t- The AMRC in Sheffield is a key player in industrial 6G slicing, with pilots in immersive workloads and digital twinning\n- Regional case studies\n\t- Manchester’s smart city initiatives are leveraging 6G slicing for immersive urban services\n\t- Leeds is exploring slicing for healthcare and remote monitoring applications\n\t- Newcastle’s digital innovation hub is piloting slicing for autonomous mobility and smart transport\n\n## Future Directions\n\n- Emerging trends and developments\n\t- AI-driven, context-aware slicing for dynamic service provisioning\n\t- Integration of sensing and communication in 6G slicing\n\t- Seamless cross-domain and multi-operator slicing\n- Anticipated challenges\n\t- Complexity of cross-domain orchestration\n\t- Security and privacy concerns\n\t- Need for robust standards and interoperability\n- Research priorities\n\t- AI-driven orchestration and automation\n\t- Cross-layer security and privacy\n\t- Integration of sensing and communication\n\n## References\n\n1. Uusitalo, M., Chaffer, K., & Ladid, L. (2025). Cross-Layer Security for 5G/6G Network Slices: An SDN, NFV, and AI Perspective. Sensors, 25(11), 3335. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25113335\n2. Ericsson. (2025). 6G: The Next Generation of Cellular Networks. Ericsson White Paper. https://www.ericsson.com/en/6g\n3. Pereira, J., & Ladid, L. (2025). Symposium on 6G Communications. IEEE FNWF 2025. https://fnwf2025.ieee.org/symposium-6g-communications\n4. 6G Innovation Centre. (2025). 6G Research and Development. University of Surrey. https://www.surrey.ac.uk/6g-innovation-centre\n5. Northern 5G. (2025). Advanced Network Slicing for Smart Cities and Industry. https://www.northern5g.com\n6. Advanced Manufacturing Research Centre. (2025). 6G Slicing for Industrial Applications. https://www.amrc.co.uk\n7. European Telecommunications Standards Institute. (2025). 6G Network Slicing Standards. https://www.etsi.org\n8. 3GPP. (2025). 6G Network Slicing Specifications. https://www.3gpp.org\n\n## Metadata\n\n- **Last Updated**: 2025-11-11\n- **Review Status**: Comprehensive editorial review\n- **Verification**: Academic sources verified\n- **Regional Context**: UK/North England where applicable",
55
"backlinks": [],
66
"wiki_links": [
7+
"InfrastructureDomain",
8+
"Network Function Virtualization",
9+
"Service Level Agreement",
710
"Workload Isolation",
8-
"Traffic Classifier",
9-
"Virtual Network",
1011
"3GPP Release 21",
11-
"6G Network Infrastructure",
12+
"ETSI ENI 008",
1213
"Low Latency Service",
13-
"Network Slice",
14+
"Resource Allocation Unit",
1415
"5G Network Slice",
15-
"Network Function Virtualization",
16-
"Service Level Agreement",
16+
"Guaranteed Bandwidth",
17+
"SDN Controller",
1718
"NetworkLayer",
18-
"InfrastructureDomain",
19+
"Traffic Classifier",
20+
"Network Slice",
1921
"Network Slicing Orchestrator",
20-
"SDN Controller",
21-
"QoS Policy",
22-
"Guaranteed Bandwidth",
23-
"Resource Allocation Unit",
2422
"Dynamic Resource Allocation",
25-
"ETSI ENI 008"
23+
"6G Network Infrastructure",
24+
"QoS Policy",
25+
"Virtual Network"
2626
],
2727
"ontology": {
2828
"term_id": "20140",

api/pages/pages/ADAS.json

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -4,10 +4,10 @@
44
"content": "- ### OntologyBlock\n id:: adas-ontology\n collapsed:: true\n\t- ontology:: true\n\t- term-id:: AI-0348\n\t- preferred-term:: ADAS\n\t- status:: draft\n\t- public-access:: true\n\t- definition:: Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) are electronic systems that assist vehicle operators with driving and parking functions through automated technologies including adaptive cruise control, lane keeping assist, automatic emergency braking, blind spot detection, and parking assistance. ADAS represents SAE Level 1-2 automation, providing driver support whilst requiring continuous driver supervision and intervention capability.\n\t- #### Relationships\n\t id:: adas-relationships\n\t collapsed:: true\n\t\t- is-subclass-of:: [[Metaverse]]\n\n## OWL Formal Semantics\n\n```clojure\n;; OWL Functional Syntax\n\n(Declaration (Class :Adas))\n\n;; Annotations\n(AnnotationAssertion rdfs:label :Adas \"ADAS\"@en)\n(AnnotationAssertion rdfs:comment :Adas \"Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) are electronic systems that assist vehicle operators with driving and parking functions through automated technologies including adaptive cruise control, lane keeping assist, automatic emergency braking, blind spot detection, and parking assistance. ADAS represents SAE Level 1-2 automation, providing driver support whilst requiring continuous driver supervision and intervention capability.\"@en)\n\n;; Taxonomic Relationships\n(SubClassOf :Adas :DriverAssistanceTechnology)\n\n;; Semantic Relationships\n(SubClassOf :Adas\n (ObjectSomeValuesFrom :relatedTo :SensorFusion))\n(SubClassOf :Adas\n (ObjectSomeValuesFrom :relatedTo :AutonomousVehicle))\n(SubClassOf :Adas\n (ObjectSomeValuesFrom :relatedTo :PerceptionSystem))\n\n;; Data Properties\n(AnnotationAssertion dcterms:identifier :Adas \"AI-0348\"^^xsd:string)\n(DataPropertyAssertion :isAITechnology :Adas \"true\"^^xsd:boolean)\n```\n\n## Core Characteristics\n\n- **Driver Assistance**: Augments rather than replaces driver\n- **Safety Features**: Collision avoidance and mitigation\n- **Sensor-Based**: Camera, radar, ultrasonic sensor integration\n- **Incremental Automation**: Specific function automation\n- **Driver Monitoring**: Ensures driver attention and readiness\n\n## Relationships\n\n- **Subclass**: Driver Assistance Technology\n- **Related**: Autonomous Vehicle, Self-Driving Car, Sensor Fusion\n- **Standards**: ISO 26262, Euro NCAP, NHTSA ratings\n\n## Key Literature\n\n1. Bengler, K., et al. (2014). \"Three decades of driver assistance systems: Review and future perspectives.\" *IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine*, 6(4), 6-22.\n\n2. SAE International (2021). \"Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems.\" SAE J3016.\n\n## See Also\n\n- [[Autonomous Vehicle]]\n- [[Perception System]]\n- [[Sensor Fusion]]\n\n## Metadata\n\n- **Domain**: Automotive, Driver Assistance\n- **Maturity**: Widely deployed in production vehicles\n\t- maturity:: draft\n\t- owl:class:: mv:ADAS\n\t- owl:physicality:: ConceptualEntity\n\t- owl:role:: Concept\n\t- belongsToDomain:: [[MetaverseDomain]]\n\t- #### Relationships\n\t id:: adas-relationships\n\t\t- is-subclass-of:: [[Metaverse]]",
55
"backlinks": [],
66
"wiki_links": [
7-
"MetaverseDomain",
87
"Perception System",
9-
"Autonomous Vehicle",
8+
"MetaverseDomain",
109
"Sensor Fusion",
10+
"Autonomous Vehicle",
1111
"Metaverse"
1212
],
1313
"ontology": {

api/pages/pages/AI Agent System.json

Lines changed: 24 additions & 24 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -6,38 +6,38 @@
66
"Perception System"
77
],
88
"wiki_links": [
9-
"Model Context Protocol",
10-
"AutonomousBehavior",
9+
"Tool Use",
10+
"IEEE P7009",
1111
"Adaptive Behavior|behaviour",
1212
"LearningModule",
13-
"Tool Use",
14-
"MultiAgentCoordination",
13+
"PerceptionSystem",
14+
"MemorySystem",
15+
"Multi-Agent System|multi-agent coordination",
16+
"ArtificialIntelligence",
17+
"Anthropic Computer Use",
18+
"Sensor Input|sensors",
19+
"AI Techniques",
20+
"Browser Automation",
1521
"Machine Learning|learning",
16-
"AutonomousOperation",
22+
"ActionExecutor",
23+
"GoalAchievement",
24+
"Blockchain Integration",
25+
"MultiAgentCoordination",
26+
"Russell & Norvig AI: A Modern Approach",
27+
"ReinforcementLearning",
1728
"GoalPlanner",
18-
"AdaptiveBehavior",
1929
"DecisionEngine",
20-
"Browser Automation",
21-
"Multi-Agent System|multi-agent coordination",
22-
"ReinforcementLearning",
23-
"Russell & Norvig AI: A Modern Approach",
24-
"DecisionMaking",
25-
"GoalAchievement",
26-
"AI-GroundedDomain",
27-
"ActionExecutor",
30+
"SensorInput",
2831
"OpenAI Agent Research",
2932
"RewardFunction",
30-
"IEEE P7009",
31-
"Sensor Input|sensors",
32-
"Blockchain Integration",
33-
"PerceptionSystem",
33+
"AdaptiveBehavior",
34+
"Model Context Protocol",
35+
"DecisionMaking",
36+
"AI-GroundedDomain",
3437
"ActionSpace",
35-
"ComputationAndIntelligenceDomain",
36-
"ArtificialIntelligence",
37-
"AI Techniques",
38-
"Anthropic Computer Use",
39-
"MemorySystem",
40-
"SensorInput"
38+
"AutonomousBehavior",
39+
"AutonomousOperation",
40+
"ComputationAndIntelligenceDomain"
4141
],
4242
"ontology": {
4343
"term_id": "AI-0600",

api/pages/pages/AI Alignment.json

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -6,10 +6,10 @@
66
"Safety Laser Scanner"
77
],
88
"wiki_links": [
9-
"Anthropic",
10-
"DeepMind",
119
"OpenAI",
1210
"AISafety",
11+
"Anthropic",
12+
"DeepMind",
1313
"IEEE P7000"
1414
],
1515
"ontology": {

api/pages/pages/AI Audit.json

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -5,9 +5,9 @@
55
"backlinks": [],
66
"wiki_links": [
77
"BS ISO/IEC 42006:2025",
8-
"EU AI Act Article 43",
8+
"AIGovernance",
99
"NIST AI RMF",
10-
"AIGovernance"
10+
"EU AI Act Article 43"
1111
],
1212
"ontology": {
1313
"term_id": "AI-0105",

api/pages/pages/AI Deployment.json

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -4,9 +4,9 @@
44
"content": "- ### OntologyBlock\n id:: ai-deployment-ontology\n collapsed:: true\n\t- ontology:: true\n\t- term-id:: AI-0094\n\t- preferred-term:: AI Deployment\n\t- source-domain:: ai\n\t- status:: draft\n\t- public-access:: true\n\t- definition:: The phase of the AI lifecycle in which a developed and validated artificial intelligence system is integrated into operational environments, made available to end users, and transitioned from development to production use, encompassing activities such as system integration, infrastructure provisioning, release management, user training, documentation delivery, and the establishment of operational support structures to ensure reliable, safe, and effective system functioning in real-world conditions.\n\t- source:: [[ISO/IEC 42001:2023]], [[EU AI Act Article 9]], [[MLOps Standards]]\n\t- maturity:: mature\n\t- #### Relationships\n\t id:: ai-deployment-relationships\n\t collapsed:: true\n\t\t- is-subclass-of:: [[AILifecycle]]\n\n## AI Deployment\n\nAI Deployment refers to the phase of the ai lifecycle in which a developed and validated artificial intelligence system is integrated into operational environments, made available to end users, and transitioned from development to production use, encompassing activities such as system integration, infrastructure provisioning, release management, user training, documentation delivery, and the establishment of operational support structures to ensure reliable, safe, and effective system functioning in real-world conditions.\n\n- AI deployment has accelerated globally, with adoption outpacing governance and responsible AI maturity.\n - Industries leading adoption include technology, finance, and manufacturing, with increasing use of advanced agentic and multimodal AI systems.\n - Deployment activities now routinely involve automation of workflows, cloud infrastructure provisioning, and operational monitoring to ensure reliability and safety.\n- Notable organisations driving deployment include Microsoft, Google, and Anthropic, with platforms supporting scalable AI integration.\n- In the UK, AI deployment is supported by national strategies emphasising responsible innovation and infrastructure development.\n- Technical capabilities have advanced to support adaptive AI systems that can operate autonomously post-deployment, but challenges remain in governance, risk management, and operational transparency.\n- Standards and frameworks such as the EU Artificial Intelligence Act define key terms and regulatory expectations for AI deployment, focusing on risk and accountability.\n\n## Technical Details\n\n- **Id**: ai-deployment-ontology\n- **Collapsed**: true\n- **Source Domain**: ai\n- **Status**: draft\n- **Public Access**: true\n\n## Research & Literature\n\n- Key academic sources on AI deployment include:\n - Benaich, N., & Hogarth, I. (2025). *The State of AI Report 2025*. AI Index Foundation. DOI: 10.1234/soai2025\n - Amershi, S., et al. (2019). *Software Engineering for Machine Learning: A Case Study*. Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Software Engineering. DOI: 10.1109/ICSE.2019.00045\n - Sculley, D., et al. (2015). *Hidden Technical Debt in Machine Learning Systems*. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 28.\n- Ongoing research focuses on:\n - Improving deployment automation and continuous integration (MLOps).\n - Enhancing explainability and safety in operational AI.\n - Developing frameworks for responsible AI governance and risk mitigation.\n\n## UK Context\n\n- The UK government promotes AI deployment through initiatives like the AI Sector Deal and the Alan Turing Institute’s operational research.\n- North England hosts innovation hubs in Manchester, Leeds, Newcastle, and Sheffield, focusing on AI deployment in healthcare, manufacturing, and smart city applications.\n - For example, Manchester’s AI Foundry supports SMEs in deploying AI solutions into production environments.\n - Leeds Digital Hub fosters AI integration in financial services and logistics.\n- Regional case studies highlight successful AI deployment projects improving operational efficiency and customer engagement, with emphasis on ethical and safe AI use.\n\n## Future Directions\n\n- Emerging trends include:\n - Greater automation of deployment pipelines (MLOps 2.0) with enhanced monitoring and self-healing capabilities.\n - Integration of AI governance tools directly into deployment workflows.\n - Expansion of AI deployment into edge computing and IoT environments.\n- Anticipated challenges:\n - Balancing rapid deployment with robust risk management and regulatory compliance.\n - Addressing workforce skills gaps in AI operations and support.\n - Ensuring transparency and user trust in deployed AI systems.\n- Research priorities:\n - Developing standardised metrics for deployment success and operational safety.\n - Exploring socio-technical impacts of AI deployment in diverse sectors.\n - Innovating deployment strategies for adaptive and autonomous AI systems.\n\n## References\n\n1. Benaich, N., & Hogarth, I. (2025). *The State of AI Report 2025*. AI Index Foundation. DOI: 10.1234/soai2025\n2. Amershi, S., et al. (2019). *Software Engineering for Machine Learning: A Case Study*. Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Software Engineering. DOI: 10.1109/ICSE.2019.00045\n3. Sculley, D., et al. (2015). *Hidden Technical Debt in Machine Learning Systems*. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 28.\n4. European Parliament and Council. (2021). *Regulation (EU) 2021/0106 on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act)*. Official Journal of the European Union.\n5. UK Government. (2025). *National AI Strategy*. Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport.\n6. The Alan Turing Institute. (2025). *AI and Operational Research: Deployment and Impact*.\n*Deploying AI is a bit like launching a spaceship: exciting, complex, and best done with a solid checklist — preferably without the need for a last-minute spacewalk.*\n\n## Metadata\n\n- **Last Updated**: 2025-11-11\n- **Review Status**: Comprehensive editorial review\n- **Verification**: Academic sources verified\n- **Regional Context**: UK/North England where applicable",
55
"backlinks": [],
66
"wiki_links": [
7-
"MLOps Standards",
87
"AILifecycle",
98
"ISO/IEC 42001:2023",
9+
"MLOps Standards",
1010
"EU AI Act Article 9"
1111
],
1212
"ontology": {

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)