add hook to avoid requiring ncurses static libraries for CMake built with `system` toolchain by pescobar · Pull Request #81 · EESSI/software-layer-scripts

pescobar · 2025-09-04T10:31:25Z

this hook fixes issue EESSI/software-layer#1175

now I can build cmake on top of EESSI but I noticed something weird. I don't know why configopts are not completely removed. This is the original easyconfig:

configopts = "-- "
configopts += "-DCURSES_CURSES_LIBRARY=$EBROOTNCURSES/lib/libcurses.a "
configopts += "-DCURSES_FORM_LIBRARY=$EBROOTNCURSES/lib/libform.a "
configopts += "-DCURSES_NCURSES_LIBRARY=$EBROOTNCURSES/lib/libncurses.a "

but when building with this hook I see this (notice the -- after --parallel=16

  >> running shell command:
        ./configure --prefix=/scicore/home/scicore/escobar/eessi/versions/2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2/software/CMake/3.18.4  --parallel=16 --verbose --  -DCMAKE_USE_OPENSSL=ON

I am also not sure if I should use print_msg() or something different like log.info or log.debug

EESSI/software-layer#1175

boegel · 2025-09-04T17:44:44Z

+
+    if self.name == 'CMake':
+        if self.toolchain.name == 'system':
+            print_msg("Unset configopts to use ncurses library from the EESSI compatibility layer")


Use self.log.info here, or print_msg with log=self.log if you want to be very verbose about this.

I would also log what the previous value of configopts was, so it's clear what's being wiped.

@boegel I have updated the log messages as suggested

… with system compiler

only remove `-DCURSES_.*_LIBRARY` configure options when building CMake…

boegel

lgtm, tested to verify that it works as intended

boegel · 2025-09-11T09:46:43Z

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws for:arch=x86_64/amd/zen2

eessi-bot-aws · 2025-09-11T09:46:50Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-mc-aws for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software
Building on: amd-zen2
Building for: x86_64/amd/zen2
Job dir: /project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.09/pr_81/89226

date	job status	comment
Sep 11 09:46:49 UTC 2025	submitted	job id `89226` awaits release by job manager
Sep 11 09:47:12 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Sep 11 09:48:15 UTC 2025	running	job `89226` is running
Sep 11 09:51:18 UTC 2025	finished	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-89226.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ✅ no message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `FAILED:` ✅ no message matching `required modules missing:` ✅ found message(s) matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.gz created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-x86_64-amd-zen2-17575840670.tar.gz` size: 0 MiB (20076 bytes) entries: 1 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2/modules/all no module files in tarball software under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2/software no software packages in tarball reprod directories under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2/reprod no reprod directories in tarball other under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2 `2023.06/init/easybuild/eb_hooks.py`
Sep 11 09:51:18 UTC 2025	test result	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) ReFrame Summary [ OK ] ( 1/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: perf: 438.676 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 2/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: perf: 446.917 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 3/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /775175bf @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: latency: 1.81 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 4/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /52707c40 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: latency: 1.74 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /b1aacda9 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: latency: 3.97 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /c6bad193 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: latency: 4.03 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: latency: 0.56 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: latency: 0.55 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: bandwidth: 7407.31 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:x86_64_amd_zen2+default P: bandwidth: 7296.66 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 10/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 0 skipped, 0 aborted) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-89226.out` ✅ no message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`
Sep 11 09:56:18 UTC 2025	uploaded	transfer of `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-x86_64-amd-zen2-17575840670.tar.gz` to S3 bucket succeeded
Sep 11 13:38:04 UTC 2025	uploaded	transfer of `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-x86_64-amd-zen2-17575840670.tar.gz` to S3 bucket succeeded

boegel · 2025-09-11T12:15:46Z

staging PR merged...

bedroge · 2025-09-11T13:14:34Z

@boegel we should also build and deploy this for 2025.06?

boegel · 2025-09-11T13:18:47Z

@boegel we should also build and deploy this for 2025.06?

Yes, exactly. ❤️ CI

boegel · 2025-09-11T13:18:55Z

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2025.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws for:arch=x86_64/amd/zen2

eessi-bot-aws · 2025-09-11T13:19:03Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-mc-aws for repository eessi.io-2025.06-software
Building on: amd-zen2
Building for: x86_64/amd/zen2
Job dir: /project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.09/pr_81/89227

date	job status	comment
Sep 11 13:19:02 UTC 2025	submitted	job id `89227` awaits release by job manager
Sep 11 13:19:38 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Sep 11 13:25:40 UTC 2025	finished	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-89227.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ✅ no message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `FAILED:` ✅ no message matching `required modules missing:` ✅ found message(s) matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.gz created!` Artefacts `eessi-2025.06-software-linux-x86_64-amd-zen2-17575970950.tar.gz` size: 0 MiB (20080 bytes) entries: 1 modules under 2025.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2/modules/all no module files in tarball software under 2025.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2/software no software packages in tarball reprod directories under 2025.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2/reprod no reprod directories in tarball other under 2025.06/software/linux/x86_64/amd/zen2 `2025.06/init/easybuild/eb_hooks.py`
Sep 11 13:25:40 UTC 2025	test result	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Reason EESSI test suite was not run, test step itself failed to execute. Details ✅ job output file `slurm-89227.out` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`
Sep 11 13:38:13 UTC 2025	uploaded	transfer of `eessi-2025.06-software-linux-x86_64-amd-zen2-17575970950.tar.gz` to S3 bucket succeeded

boegel · 2025-09-11T14:11:23Z

staging PR for 2025.06 merged

cmake hook to use ncurses library from EESSI

45c006b

EESSI/software-layer#1175

boegel reviewed Sep 4, 2025

View reviewed changes

update log messsages in the cmake hook

265f2bf

boegel self-assigned this Sep 9, 2025

only remove -DCURSES_.*_LIBRARY configure options when building CMake…

2e9c060

… with system compiler

boegel mentioned this pull request Sep 11, 2025

only remove -DCURSES_.*_LIBRARY configure options when building CMake… pescobar/software-layer-scripts#1

Merged

boegel requested changes Sep 11, 2025

View reviewed changes

Comment thread eb_hooks.py Outdated

Merge pull request #1 from boegel/hook-cmake-system

f940c71

only remove `-DCURSES_.*_LIBRARY` configure options when building CMake…

boegel approved these changes Sep 11, 2025

View reviewed changes

boegel added the bot:deploy label Sep 11, 2025

boegel added bot:deploy and removed bot:deploy labels Sep 11, 2025

boegel changed the title ~~cmake hook to use ncurses library from EESSI~~ add hook to avoid requiring ncurses static libraries for CMake built with system toolchain Sep 11, 2025

boegel merged commit 56ada04 into EESSI:main Sep 11, 2025
85 of 96 checks passed

boegel mentioned this pull request Sep 11, 2025

cannot build CMake-3.18.4.eb on top of EESSI 2023.06 EESSI/software-layer#1175

Closed

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

add hook to avoid requiring ncurses static libraries for CMake built with `system` toolchain#81

add hook to avoid requiring ncurses static libraries for CMake built with `system` toolchain#81
boegel merged 4 commits intoEESSI:mainfrom
pescobar:hook-cmake-system

pescobar commented Sep 4, 2025

Uh oh!

boegel Sep 4, 2025

Uh oh!

pescobar Sep 8, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

boegel left a comment

Uh oh!

boegel commented Sep 11, 2025

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-aws Bot commented Sep 11, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

boegel commented Sep 11, 2025

Uh oh!

bedroge commented Sep 11, 2025

Uh oh!

boegel commented Sep 11, 2025

Uh oh!

boegel commented Sep 11, 2025

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-aws Bot commented Sep 11, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

boegel commented Sep 11, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

Conversation

pescobar commented Sep 4, 2025

Uh oh!

boegel Sep 4, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

pescobar Sep 8, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

boegel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

boegel commented Sep 11, 2025

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-aws Bot commented Sep 11, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

boegel commented Sep 11, 2025

Uh oh!

bedroge commented Sep 11, 2025

Uh oh!

boegel commented Sep 11, 2025

Uh oh!

boegel commented Sep 11, 2025

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-aws Bot commented Sep 11, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

boegel commented Sep 11, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

eessi-bot-aws Bot commented Sep 11, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot-aws Bot commented Sep 11, 2025 •

edited

Loading