testing #87 by laraPPr · Pull Request #88 · EESSI/software-layer-scripts

laraPPr · 2025-09-23T13:45:26Z

DO NOT MERGE

Signed-off-by: laraPPr <lara.peeters@ugent.be>

laraPPr · 2025-09-23T13:47:04Z

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-jsc for:arch=aarch64/nvidia/grace,accel=nvidia/cc90

Signed-off-by: laraPPr <lara.peeters@ugent.be>

laraPPr · 2025-09-23T13:50:28Z

bot: help

eessi-bot-aws · 2025-09-23T13:50:32Z

Updates by the bot instance eessi-bot-mc-aws (click for details)

received bot command help from laraPPr
- expanded format: help
handling command help resulted in:
How to send commands to bot instances
- Commands must be sent with a new comment (edits of existing comments are ignored).
- A comment may contain multiple commands, one per line.
- Every command begins at the start of a line and has the syntax bot: COMMAND [ARGUMENTS]*
- Currently supported COMMANDs are: help, build, show_config, status
For more information, see https://www.eessi.io/docs/bot

eessi-bot-surf · 2025-09-23T13:50:32Z

Updates by the bot instance eessi-bot-surf (click for details)

received bot command help from laraPPr
- expanded format: help
handling command help resulted in:
How to send commands to bot instances
- Commands must be sent with a new comment (edits of existing comments are ignored).
- A comment may contain multiple commands, one per line.
- Every command begins at the start of a line and has the syntax bot: COMMAND [ARGUMENTS]*
- Currently supported COMMANDs are: help, build, show_config, status
For more information, see https://www.eessi.io/docs/bot

gpu-bot-ugent · 2025-09-23T13:50:32Z

Updates by the bot instance eessi-bot-vsc-ugent (click for details)

received bot command help from laraPPr
- expanded format: help
handling command help resulted in:
How to send commands to bot instances
- Commands must be sent with a new comment (edits of existing comments are ignored).
- A comment may contain multiple commands, one per line.
- Every command begins at the start of a line and has the syntax bot: COMMAND [ARGUMENTS]*
- Currently supported COMMANDs are: help, build, show_config, status
For more information, see https://www.eessi.io/docs/bot

eessi-bot-deucalion · 2025-09-23T13:50:32Z

Updates by the bot instance eessi-bot-deucalion (click for details)

received bot command help from laraPPr
- expanded format: help
handling command help resulted in:
How to send commands to bot instances
- Commands must be sent with a new comment (edits of existing comments are ignored).
- A comment may contain multiple commands, one per line.
- Every command begins at the start of a line and has the syntax bot: COMMAND [ARGUMENTS]*
- Currently supported COMMANDs are: help, build, show_config, status
For more information, see https://www.eessi.io/docs/bot

eessi-bot-jsc · 2025-09-23T13:50:32Z

Updates by the bot instance eessi-bot-jsc (click for details)

received bot command help from laraPPr
- expanded format: help
handling command help resulted in:
How to send commands to bot instances
- Commands must be sent with a new comment (edits of existing comments are ignored).
- A comment may contain multiple commands, one per line.
- Every command begins at the start of a line and has the syntax bot: COMMAND [ARGUMENTS]*
- Currently supported COMMANDs are: help, build, show_config, status
For more information, see https://www.eessi.io/docs/bot

laraPPr · 2025-09-23T14:08:55Z

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-jsc for:arch=aarch64/nvidia/grace,accel=nvidia/cc90

eessi-bot-jsc · 2025-09-23T14:09:02Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-jsc for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software
Building on: nvidia-grace and accelerator nvidia/cc90
Building for: aarch64/nvidia/grace and accelerator nvidia/cc90
Job dir: /p/project1/ceasybuilders/eessibot/jobs/2025.09/pr_88/14080127

date	job status	comment
Sep 23 14:09:00 UTC 2025	submitted	job id `14080127` awaits release by job manager
Sep 23 14:09:41 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Sep 23 15:32:55 UTC 2025	running	job `14080127` is running
Sep 23 15:42:10 UTC 2025	finished	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-14080127.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `FAILED:` ❌ found message matching `required modules missing:` ❌ no message matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.gz created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-nvidia-grace-accel-nvidia-cc90-17586417060.tar.gz` size: 0 MiB (20693 bytes) entries: 1 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/nvidia/grace/accel/nvidia/cc90/modules/all no module files in tarball software under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/nvidia/grace/accel/nvidia/cc90/software no software packages in tarball reprod directories under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/nvidia/grace/accel/nvidia/cc90/reprod no reprod directories in tarball other under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/nvidia/grace/accel/nvidia/cc90 `2023.06/init/easybuild/eb_hooks.py`
Sep 23 15:42:10 UTC 2025	test result	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) ReFrame Summary [ SKIP ] ( 1/26) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 2/26) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 3/26) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 4/26) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 5/26) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 6/26) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 7/26) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 8/26) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ OK ] ( 9/26) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace_accel_nvidia_cc90+default P: perf: 1571.466 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (10/26) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace_accel_nvidia_cc90+default P: perf: 1560.195 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (11/26) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /775175bf @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace_accel_nvidia_cc90+default P: latency: 4.84 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (12/26) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /52707c40 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace_accel_nvidia_cc90+default P: latency: 4.88 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (13/26) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.5-gompi-2023b-CUDA-12.4.0 %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /95ac9526 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace_accel_nvidia_cc90+default P: latency: 5.09 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (14/26) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023a-CUDA-12.1.1 %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /1cff5d41 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace_accel_nvidia_cc90+default P: latency: 5.41 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (15/26) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /b1aacda9 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace_accel_nvidia_cc90+default P: latency: 7.32 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (16/26) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /c6bad193 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace_accel_nvidia_cc90+default P: latency: 7.31 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (17/26) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.5-gompi-2023b-CUDA-12.4.0 %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /0edb8a95 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace_accel_nvidia_cc90+default P: latency: 8.69 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (18/26) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023a-CUDA-12.1.1 %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /b2ab2213 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace_accel_nvidia_cc90+default P: latency: 8.6 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (19/26) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace_accel_nvidia_cc90+default P: latency: 0.48 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (20/26) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace_accel_nvidia_cc90+default P: latency: 0.49 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (21/26) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.5-gompi-2023b-CUDA-12.4.0 %scale=1_node /8ec94746 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace_accel_nvidia_cc90+default P: latency: 0.52 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (22/26) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023a-CUDA-12.1.1 %scale=1_node /1a3a497b @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace_accel_nvidia_cc90+default P: latency: 0.5 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (23/26) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace_accel_nvidia_cc90+default P: bandwidth: 38184.65 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (24/26) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace_accel_nvidia_cc90+default P: bandwidth: 42394.92 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (25/26) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.5-gompi-2023b-CUDA-12.4.0 %scale=1_node /c9ca6dc1 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace_accel_nvidia_cc90+default P: bandwidth: 41372.36 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (26/26) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023a-CUDA-12.1.1 %scale=1_node /17289b2f @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace_accel_nvidia_cc90+default P: bandwidth: 42061.14 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 18/26 test case(s) from 26 check(s) (0 failure(s), 8 skipped, 0 aborted) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-14080127.out` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`

Signed-off-by: laraPPr <lara.peeters@ugent.be>

laraPPr · 2025-09-24T07:53:07Z

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-jsc for:arch=aarch64/nvidia/grace,accel=nvidia/cc90

eessi-bot-jsc · 2025-09-24T07:53:14Z

error: eb_hooks.py: patch does not apply

Unable to download or merge changes between the source branch and the destination branch.
Tip: This can usually be resolved by syncing your branch and resolving any merge conflicts.

laraPPr · 2025-09-24T08:06:41Z

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-jsc for:arch=aarch64/nvidia/grace,accel=nvidia/cc90

eessi-bot-jsc · 2025-09-24T08:06:48Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-jsc for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software
Building on: nvidia-grace and accelerator nvidia/cc90
Building for: aarch64/nvidia/grace and accelerator nvidia/cc90
Job dir: /p/project1/ceasybuilders/eessibot/jobs/2025.09/pr_88/14082298

date	job status	comment
Sep 24 08:06:46 UTC 2025	submitted	job id `14082298` awaits release by job manager
Sep 24 08:06:57 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Sep 24 08:08:01 UTC 2025	running	job `14082298` is running
Sep 24 08:17:18 UTC 2025	finished	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-14082298.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ❌ found message matching `FAILED:` ❌ found message matching `required modules missing:` ❌ no message matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.gz created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-nvidia-grace-accel-nvidia-cc90-17587014090.tar.gz` size: 0 MiB (20932 bytes) entries: 1 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/nvidia/grace/accel/nvidia/cc90/modules/all no module files in tarball software under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/nvidia/grace/accel/nvidia/cc90/software no software packages in tarball reprod directories under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/nvidia/grace/accel/nvidia/cc90/reprod no reprod directories in tarball other under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/nvidia/grace/accel/nvidia/cc90 `2023.06/init/easybuild/eb_hooks.py`
Sep 24 08:17:18 UTC 2025	test result	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) ReFrame Summary [ SKIP ] ( 1/26) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 2/26) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 3/26) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 4/26) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 5/26) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 6/26) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 7/26) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ SKIP ] ( 8/26) Skipping GPU test : only 1 GPU available for this test case [ OK ] ( 9/26) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace_accel_nvidia_cc90+default P: perf: 1516.356 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (10/26) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace_accel_nvidia_cc90+default P: perf: 1530.091 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (11/26) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /775175bf @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace_accel_nvidia_cc90+default P: latency: 4.95 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (12/26) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /52707c40 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace_accel_nvidia_cc90+default P: latency: 4.91 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (13/26) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.5-gompi-2023b-CUDA-12.4.0 %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /95ac9526 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace_accel_nvidia_cc90+default P: latency: 5.17 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (14/26) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023a-CUDA-12.1.1 %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /1cff5d41 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace_accel_nvidia_cc90+default P: latency: 4.88 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (15/26) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /b1aacda9 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace_accel_nvidia_cc90+default P: latency: 7.25 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (16/26) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /c6bad193 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace_accel_nvidia_cc90+default P: latency: 6.89 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (17/26) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.5-gompi-2023b-CUDA-12.4.0 %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /0edb8a95 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace_accel_nvidia_cc90+default P: latency: 8.62 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (18/26) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023a-CUDA-12.1.1 %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /b2ab2213 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace_accel_nvidia_cc90+default P: latency: 8.63 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (19/26) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace_accel_nvidia_cc90+default P: latency: 0.5 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (20/26) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace_accel_nvidia_cc90+default P: latency: 0.49 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (21/26) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.5-gompi-2023b-CUDA-12.4.0 %scale=1_node /8ec94746 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace_accel_nvidia_cc90+default P: latency: 0.52 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (22/26) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023a-CUDA-12.1.1 %scale=1_node /1a3a497b @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace_accel_nvidia_cc90+default P: latency: 0.5 us (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (23/26) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace_accel_nvidia_cc90+default P: bandwidth: 42019.79 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (24/26) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace_accel_nvidia_cc90+default P: bandwidth: 41628.94 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (25/26) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.5-gompi-2023b-CUDA-12.4.0 %scale=1_node /c9ca6dc1 @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace_accel_nvidia_cc90+default P: bandwidth: 40536.68 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ OK ] (26/26) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023a-CUDA-12.1.1 %scale=1_node /17289b2f @BotBuildTests:aarch64_nvidia_grace_accel_nvidia_cc90+default P: bandwidth: 41494.93 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None) [ PASSED ] Ran 18/26 test case(s) from 26 check(s) (0 failure(s), 8 skipped, 0 aborted) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-14082298.out` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`

Signed-off-by: laraPPr <lara.peeters@ugent.be>

laraPPr · 2025-09-24T08:57:28Z

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-jsc for:arch=aarch64/nvidia/grace,accel=nvidia/cc90

laraPPr · 2025-09-24T12:46:23Z

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws on:arch=aarch64/generic for:arch=aarch64/generic,accel=nvidia/cc80

eessi-bot-aws · 2025-09-24T12:46:29Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-mc-aws for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software
Building on: generic
Building for: aarch64/generic and accelerator nvidia/cc80
Job dir: /project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.09/pr_88/92126

date	job status	comment
Sep 24 12:46:28 UTC 2025	submitted	job id `92126` awaits release by job manager
Sep 24 12:46:44 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Sep 24 12:47:46 UTC 2025	running	job `92126` is running
Sep 24 12:55:57 UTC 2025	finished	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-92126.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ❌ found message matching `FAILED:` ❌ found message matching `required modules missing:` ❌ no message matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.gz created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-generic-accel-nvidia-cc80-17587185060.tar.gz` size: 0 MiB (21003 bytes) entries: 1 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/generic/accel/nvidia/cc80/modules/all no module files in tarball software under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/generic/accel/nvidia/cc80/software no software packages in tarball reprod directories under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/generic/accel/nvidia/cc80/reprod no reprod directories in tarball other under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/generic/accel/nvidia/cc80 `2023.06/init/easybuild/eb_hooks.py`
Sep 24 12:55:57 UTC 2025	test result	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Reason EESSI test suite was not run, test step itself failed to execute. Details ✅ job output file `slurm-92126.out` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`

Signed-off-by: laraPPr <lara.peeters@ugent.be>

laraPPr · 2025-09-24T13:23:11Z

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws on:arch=aarch64/generic for:arch=aarch64/generic,accel=nvidia/cc80

eessi-bot-aws · 2025-09-24T13:23:18Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-mc-aws for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software
Building on: generic
Building for: aarch64/generic and accelerator nvidia/cc80
Job dir: /project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.09/pr_88/92127

date	job status	comment
Sep 24 13:23:17 UTC 2025	submitted	job id `92127` awaits release by job manager
Sep 24 13:24:03 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Sep 24 13:25:05 UTC 2025	running	job `92127` is running
Sep 24 13:26:07 UTC 2025	finished	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-92127.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ❌ found message matching `FAILED:` ❌ found message matching `required modules missing:` ❌ no message matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.gz created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-generic-accel-nvidia-cc80-17587203160.tar.gz` size: 0 MiB (21013 bytes) entries: 1 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/generic/accel/nvidia/cc80/modules/all no module files in tarball software under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/generic/accel/nvidia/cc80/software no software packages in tarball reprod directories under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/generic/accel/nvidia/cc80/reprod no reprod directories in tarball other under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/generic/accel/nvidia/cc80 `2023.06/init/easybuild/eb_hooks.py`
Sep 24 13:26:07 UTC 2025	test result	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Reason EESSI test suite was not run, test step itself failed to execute. Details ✅ job output file `slurm-92127.out` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`

Signed-off-by: laraPPr <lara.peeters@ugent.be>

laraPPr · 2025-09-24T13:34:17Z

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws on:arch=aarch64/generic for:arch=aarch64/generic,accel=nvidia/cc80

eessi-bot-aws · 2025-09-24T13:34:24Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-mc-aws for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software
Building on: generic
Building for: aarch64/generic and accelerator nvidia/cc80
Job dir: /project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.09/pr_88/92128

date	job status	comment
Sep 24 13:34:23 UTC 2025	submitted	job id `92128` awaits release by job manager
Sep 24 13:35:11 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Sep 24 13:36:14 UTC 2025	running	job `92128` is running
Sep 24 13:37:16 UTC 2025	finished	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-92128.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ❌ found message matching `FAILED:` ❌ found message matching `required modules missing:` ❌ no message matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.gz created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-generic-accel-nvidia-cc80-17587209830.tar.gz` size: 0 MiB (21006 bytes) entries: 1 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/generic/accel/nvidia/cc80/modules/all no module files in tarball software under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/generic/accel/nvidia/cc80/software no software packages in tarball reprod directories under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/generic/accel/nvidia/cc80/reprod no reprod directories in tarball other under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/generic/accel/nvidia/cc80 `2023.06/init/easybuild/eb_hooks.py`
Sep 24 13:37:16 UTC 2025	test result	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Reason EESSI test suite was not run, test step itself failed to execute. Details ✅ job output file `slurm-92128.out` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`

laraPPr · 2025-09-24T14:15:08Z

Setting ARMV7 for generic is not possible because it gets ignored. See https://github.com/easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks/blob/cc4b1f80cb0bff382b4af616dcbbcebb1fa529db/easybuild/easyblocks/l/lammps.py#L273C9-L281C53. Which causes the build to fail. We cannot adjust it with the pre_configure_hook since it gets overruled during the configure step. And it will be to late to adjust it in the post-configure_hook. So we'll need to update the easyblock.

laraPPr · 2025-09-25T08:42:38Z

Will need to be implemented in the easyblock because of the generic ARM builds.

Signed-off-by: laraPPr <lara.peeters@ugent.be>

laraPPr · 2025-09-25T09:33:03Z

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws on:arch=neoverse_n1 for:arch=aarch64/neoverse_n1,accel=nvidia/cc80

eessi-bot-aws · 2025-09-25T09:33:09Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-mc-aws for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software
Building on: neoverse_n1
Building for: aarch64/neoverse_n1 and accelerator nvidia/cc80
Job dir: /project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.09/pr_88/92348

date	job status	comment
Sep 25 09:33:08 UTC 2025	submitted	job id `92348` awaits release by job manager
Sep 25 09:33:36 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Sep 25 09:39:39 UTC 2025	running	job `92348` is running
Sep 25 09:47:51 UTC 2025	finished	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-92348.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ❌ found message matching `FAILED:` ❌ found message matching `required modules missing:` ❌ no message matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.gz created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-neoverse_n1-accel-nvidia-cc80-17587936530.tar.gz` size: 0 MiB (21011 bytes) entries: 1 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/neoverse_n1/accel/nvidia/cc80/modules/all no module files in tarball software under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/neoverse_n1/accel/nvidia/cc80/software no software packages in tarball reprod directories under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/neoverse_n1/accel/nvidia/cc80/reprod no reprod directories in tarball other under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/neoverse_n1/accel/nvidia/cc80 `2023.06/init/easybuild/eb_hooks.py`
Sep 25 09:47:51 UTC 2025	test result	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Reason EESSI test suite was not run, test step itself failed to execute. Details ✅ job output file `slurm-92348.out` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`

Signed-off-by: laraPPr <lara.peeters@ugent.be>

laraPPr · 2025-09-25T10:06:43Z

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws on:arch=aarch64/generic for:arch=aarch64/generic,accel=nvidia/cc80

eessi-bot-aws · 2025-09-25T10:06:49Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-mc-aws for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software
Building on: generic
Building for: aarch64/generic and accelerator nvidia/cc80
Job dir: /project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.09/pr_88/92349

date	job status	comment
Sep 25 10:06:48 UTC 2025	submitted	job id `92349` awaits release by job manager
Sep 25 10:06:57 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Sep 25 10:13:00 UTC 2025	running	job `92349` is running
Sep 25 10:14:01 UTC 2025	finished	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-92349.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `FAILED:` ✅ no message matching `required modules missing:` ❌ no message matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.gz created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-generic-accel-nvidia-cc80-17587951810.tar.gz` size: 0 MiB (20951 bytes) entries: 1 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/generic/accel/nvidia/cc80/modules/all no module files in tarball software under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/generic/accel/nvidia/cc80/software no software packages in tarball reprod directories under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/generic/accel/nvidia/cc80/reprod no reprod directories in tarball other under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/generic/accel/nvidia/cc80 `2023.06/init/easybuild/eb_hooks.py`
Sep 25 10:14:01 UTC 2025	test result	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Reason EESSI test suite was not run, test step itself failed to execute. Details ✅ job output file `slurm-92349.out` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`

Signed-off-by: laraPPr <lara.peeters@ugent.be>

laraPPr · 2025-09-25T10:20:31Z

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws on:arch=aarch64/generic for:arch=aarch64/generic,accel=nvidia/cc80

eessi-bot-aws · 2025-09-25T10:20:37Z

New job on instance eessi-bot-mc-aws for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software
Building on: generic
Building for: aarch64/generic and accelerator nvidia/cc80
Job dir: /project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.09/pr_88/92350

date	job status	comment
Sep 25 10:20:36 UTC 2025	submitted	job id `92350` awaits release by job manager
Sep 25 10:21:05 UTC 2025	released	job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Sep 25 10:22:07 UTC 2025	running	job `92350` is running
Sep 25 10:58:07 UTC 2025	finished	😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details) Details ✅ job output file `slurm-92350.out` ✅ no message matching `FATAL:` ✅ no message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `FAILED:` ✅ no message matching `required modules missing:` ✅ found message(s) matching `No missing installations` ✅ found message matching `.tar.gz created!` Artefacts `eessi-2023.06-software-linux-aarch64-generic-accel-nvidia-cc80-17587977630.tar.gz` size: 249 MiB (261956863 bytes) entries: 4465 modules under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/generic/accel/nvidia/cc80/modules/all `LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos-CUDA-12.1.1.lua` software under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/generic/accel/nvidia/cc80/software `LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos-CUDA-12.1.1` reprod directories under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/generic/accel/nvidia/cc80/reprod no reprod directories in tarball other under 2023.06/software/linux/aarch64/generic/accel/nvidia/cc80 `2023.06/init/easybuild/eb_hooks.py`
Sep 25 10:58:07 UTC 2025	test result	😢 FAILURE (click triangle for details) Reason EESSI test suite was not run, test step itself failed to execute. Details ✅ job output file `slurm-92350.out` ❌ found message matching `ERROR:` ✅ no message matching `[\sFAILED\s].Ran . test case`

laraPPr added 4 commits September 23, 2025 15:29

Upadate LAMMPS pre-configure hook to disable SIMD for ARM + CUDA

81859fa

Signed-off-by: laraPPr <lara.peeters@ugent.be>

remove trailing whitespaces

fa18458

Test LAMMMSP hook

f4b0dc5

Signed-off-by: laraPPr <lara.peeters@ugent.be>

Merge branch 'LAMMPS_hook' into test_LAMMPS_HOOK

c0a3f2d

laraPPr mentioned this pull request Sep 23, 2025

Update LAMMPS pre-configure hook to disable SIMD for ARM + CUDA #87

Merged

laraPPr added 2 commits September 23, 2025 15:48

fix python syntax

22db16b

Signed-off-by: laraPPr <lara.peeters@ugent.be>

Merge branch 'LAMMPS_hook' into test_LAMMPS_HOOK

0d31912

laraPPr added 2 commits September 24, 2025 09:52

fix variable in eb_hooks

821a181

Signed-off-by: laraPPr <lara.peeters@ugent.be>

Merge branch 'LAMMPS_hook' into test_LAMMPS_HOOK

5ebabcc

laraPPr added 2 commits September 24, 2025 10:05

Merge branch 'main' into LAMMPS_hook

a0dfa48

Merge branch 'LAMMPS_hook' into test_LAMMPS_HOOK

9704bae

laraPPr added 5 commits September 24, 2025 10:41

newer archspec is used so need to set kokkos_arch for nvidia grace

ba2b4c1

Signed-off-by: laraPPr <lara.peeters@ugent.be>

Merge branch 'LAMMPS_hook' into test_LAMMPS_HOOK

f10c5ad

fix LAMMPS pre-configure hook

a6452f8

Signed-off-by: laraPPr <lara.peeters@ugent.be>

fix style

9bd9e9a

Signed-off-by: laraPPr <lara.peeters@ugent.be>

Merge branch 'LAMMPS_hook' into test_LAMMPS_HOOK

5ad69ca

ocaisa reviewed Sep 24, 2025

View reviewed changes

Comment thread eb_hooks.py

laraPPr added 2 commits September 24, 2025 15:21

use older instructions of generic to turn of simd

a31d4aa

Signed-off-by: laraPPr <lara.peeters@ugent.be>

Merge branch 'LAMMPS_hook' into test_LAMMPS_HOOK

6ef483c

ocaisa requested changes Sep 24, 2025

View reviewed changes

Comment thread eb_hooks.py Outdated

Comment thread eb_hooks.py Outdated

laraPPr added 2 commits September 24, 2025 15:33

resolve failed configuration generic

a119733

Signed-off-by: laraPPr <lara.peeters@ugent.be>

Merge branch 'LAMMPS_hook' into test_LAMMPS_HOOK

35c8959

laraPPr closed this Sep 25, 2025

laraPPr added 2 commits September 25, 2025 11:26

Try native instead of ARMV70

6d14576

Signed-off-by: laraPPr <lara.peeters@ugent.be>

Merge branch 'LAMMPS_hook' into test_LAMMPS_HOOK

9da0d64

laraPPr reopened this Sep 25, 2025

laraPPr added 3 commits September 25, 2025 11:53

go back to ARMV70

c2911b8

Signed-off-by: laraPPr <lara.peeters@ugent.be>

Merge branch 'LAMMPS_hook' into test_LAMMPS_HOOK

d1d2bb9

add easyblock to overide kokkos_arch for aarch64/generic

daa99db

Signed-off-by: laraPPr <lara.peeters@ugent.be>

fix syntax in yml file

cd3463e

Signed-off-by: laraPPr <lara.peeters@ugent.be>

laraPPr closed this Sep 25, 2025

ocaisa mentioned this pull request Sep 25, 2025

enhance LAMMPS easyblock to make it possible to overide kokkos_arch for GENERIC ARM target easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3943

Merged

Conversation

laraPPr commented Sep 23, 2025

Uh oh!

laraPPr commented Sep 23, 2025

Uh oh!

laraPPr commented Sep 23, 2025

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-aws Bot commented Sep 23, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-surf Bot commented Sep 23, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

gpu-bot-ugent Bot commented Sep 23, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-deucalion Bot commented Sep 23, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-jsc Bot commented Sep 23, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

laraPPr commented Sep 23, 2025

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-jsc Bot commented Sep 23, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

laraPPr commented Sep 24, 2025

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-jsc Bot commented Sep 24, 2025

Uh oh!

laraPPr commented Sep 24, 2025

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-jsc Bot commented Sep 24, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

laraPPr commented Sep 24, 2025

Uh oh!

laraPPr commented Sep 24, 2025

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-aws Bot commented Sep 24, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

laraPPr commented Sep 24, 2025

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-aws Bot commented Sep 24, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

laraPPr commented Sep 24, 2025

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-aws Bot commented Sep 24, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

laraPPr commented Sep 24, 2025

Uh oh!

laraPPr commented Sep 25, 2025

Uh oh!

laraPPr commented Sep 25, 2025

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-aws Bot commented Sep 25, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

laraPPr commented Sep 25, 2025

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-aws Bot commented Sep 25, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

laraPPr commented Sep 25, 2025

Uh oh!

eessi-bot-aws Bot commented Sep 25, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

eessi-bot-aws Bot commented Sep 23, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot-surf Bot commented Sep 23, 2025 •

edited

Loading

gpu-bot-ugent Bot commented Sep 23, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot-deucalion Bot commented Sep 23, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot-jsc Bot commented Sep 23, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot-jsc Bot commented Sep 23, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot-jsc Bot commented Sep 24, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot-aws Bot commented Sep 24, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot-aws Bot commented Sep 24, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot-aws Bot commented Sep 24, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot-aws Bot commented Sep 25, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot-aws Bot commented Sep 25, 2025 •

edited

Loading

eessi-bot-aws Bot commented Sep 25, 2025 •

edited

Loading