Change prescribed chemistry/aerosol schemes to use ccpp_scheme_utils; fully use diagnostic names in sima_state_diagnostics

[jimmielin]

Tag name (The PR title should also include the tag name):
Originator(s): @jimmielin

Description (include issue title and the keyword ['closes', 'fixes', 'resolves'] and issue number):

• Change prescribed chemistry/aerosol schemes to use ccpp_scheme_utils so they are case-insensitive - companion PR to sima0_16_001: Make constituent names case-insensitive in IC file read path, consistent with the CCPP framework; update framework tag CAM-SIMA#518
• Add MYNN PBL scheme to convection-permitting physics suite #397 (in 979c6bc) changed sima_state_diagnostics to use %diagnostic_name to add field but not the write loop, so if the two cases mismatched (due to the case-insensitivity fixes they now do) the history_out_field would be mismatched and would write uninitialized heap memory into the netCDF file rather than the variable.

List all namelist files that were added or changed:

List all files eliminated and why:

List all files added and what they do:

List all existing files that have been modified, and describe the changes:
(Helpful git command: git diff --name-status main...<your_branch_name>)

M       schemes/chemistry/prescribed_aerosols.F90
M       schemes/chemistry/prescribed_aerosols.meta
M       schemes/chemistry/prescribed_ozone.F90
M       schemes/chemistry/prescribed_ozone.meta
  - change to use ccpp_scheme_utils.
 
M       schemes/sima_diagnostics/sima_state_diagnostics.F90
  - change to use diagnostic_name in history_out_field.

List all automated tests that failed, as well as an explanation for why they weren't fixed:

Is this an answer-changing PR? If so, is it a new physics package, algorithm change, tuning change, etc?

If yes to the above question, describe how this code was validated with the new/modified features:

[climbfuji]

looks like this will work fine with capgen v1, too

[nusbaume]

Thanks @jimmielin! I just had one optional request.

[cacraigucar]

Looks good - interesting that ccpp_constituent_index does not return an errcode/errflag from one else section, so that you need to check for a negative const_idx after having checked for errocde.