Summary
The heaviest CI jobs (ASan/UBSan and Valgrind Test CLN) intermittently get their runner killed part-way through the test step. The GitHub annotation only shows Error: The operation was canceled, with no test failure, which makes it look like "almost every test broke". On the ASan/UBSan (3/6) shard it reproduces at almost exactly the 10% mark.
This is not a test failure and not the concurrency/fail-fast config. The runner VM itself is being terminated mid-run, most likely from memory exhaustion on the 16GB hosted runner.
Evidence
The real cause is one line above the cancellation in the raw job log (hidden from the annotations view):
##[error]The runner has received a shutdown signal. This can happen when the runner service is stopped, or a manually started runner is canceled.
[gw2] [ 10%] PASSED tests/test_closing.py::test_segwit_shutdown_script
##[error]The operation was canceled.
No test errored. The runner agent died, so every in-flight and pending test on that shard is reported cancelled.
Sample runs:
What it is not
-
Not the concurrency / cancel-in-progress group (.github/workflows/ci.yaml:9). That cancels the whole run. In the master run above only three shards died while every sibling passed:
ASan/UBSan (1/6) success ASan/UBSan (3/6) FAILURE ASan/UBSan (4/6) success ...
Valgrind (10/12) FAILURE Valgrind (12/12) FAILURE (other 10 succeeded)
-
Not fail-fast. Both integration-sanitizers and integration-valgrind set fail-fast: false (ci.yaml:729, ci.yaml:665), so a sibling cannot cancel them.
-
Not a timeout. The shard died at ~6 min; the job timeout is 120 min and the per-test timeout is 1800s.
Individual runner VMs are dying independently, concentrated on exactly the two most memory-heavy job types.
Likely root cause: memory exhaustion on the 16GB hosted runner
runs-on: ubuntu-24.04 is a standard GitHub-hosted runner: 4 vCPU / 16GB RAM.
- The test step runs
pytest -n $(($(nproc) + 1)) -> 5 workers (ci.yaml:773; log confirms created: 5/5 workers).
- The build under test is
compile-clang-sanitizers; ASan roughly triples RSS and Valgrind is heavier still.
- At the moment of death,
gw0 had been running tests/test_askrene.py::test_real_data (loads the real mainnet gossip map, one of the most memory-hungry tests) for ~3 min alongside four other worker node-clusters.
Five parallel ASan lightningd+bitcoind clusters with test_real_data in the mix peaks past 16GB, and the host force-terminates the VM.
Why always ~10% on ASan/UBSan (3/6): --test-group-random-seed=42 (ci.yaml:771) fixes the shard's test set and order deterministically, so the shard hits its memory peak at the same point every run. Other runs hit the same wall on different heavy shards (e.g. Valgrind 10/12, 12/12).
The one thing not provable from the outside is OOM vs. a random hosted-runner reclaim, because GitHub does not expose the VM dmesg. The concentration on only ASan/Valgrind plus the deterministic repro point argues strongly for resource exhaustion rather than random reclaim.
Suggested fixes (cheapest first)
- Drop the worker count on the sanitizer/valgrind test steps: change
-n $(($(nproc) + 1)) to -n $(nproc) or -n $(($(nproc) - 1)) for those two jobs only. Fewer concurrent node-clusters means lower peak memory.
- Cap ASan memory via
ASAN_OPTIONS=quarantine_size_mb=64:malloc_context_size=5 in the sanitizer job env.
- Add an
if: failure() step running dmesg | grep -i oom || journalctl -k | tail so the next failure records the actual cause.
Likely the same underlying overload as the timing-based flakes such as #9268 (an 11s delay to activate connectd under load). Related tracking issue: #9222.
Summary
The heaviest CI jobs (
ASan/UBSanandValgrind Test CLN) intermittently get their runner killed part-way through the test step. The GitHub annotation only showsError: The operation was canceled, with no test failure, which makes it look like "almost every test broke". On theASan/UBSan (3/6)shard it reproduces at almost exactly the 10% mark.This is not a test failure and not the
concurrency/fail-fastconfig. The runner VM itself is being terminated mid-run, most likely from memory exhaustion on the 16GB hosted runner.Evidence
The real cause is one line above the cancellation in the raw job log (hidden from the annotations view):
No test errored. The runner agent died, so every in-flight and pending test on that shard is reported cancelled.
Sample runs:
What it is not
Not the
concurrency/cancel-in-progressgroup (.github/workflows/ci.yaml:9). That cancels the whole run. In the master run above only three shards died while every sibling passed:Not
fail-fast. Bothintegration-sanitizersandintegration-valgrindsetfail-fast: false(ci.yaml:729,ci.yaml:665), so a sibling cannot cancel them.Not a timeout. The shard died at ~6 min; the job timeout is 120 min and the per-test timeout is 1800s.
Individual runner VMs are dying independently, concentrated on exactly the two most memory-heavy job types.
Likely root cause: memory exhaustion on the 16GB hosted runner
runs-on: ubuntu-24.04is a standard GitHub-hosted runner: 4 vCPU / 16GB RAM.pytest -n $(($(nproc) + 1))-> 5 workers (ci.yaml:773; log confirmscreated: 5/5 workers).compile-clang-sanitizers; ASan roughly triples RSS and Valgrind is heavier still.gw0had been runningtests/test_askrene.py::test_real_data(loads the real mainnet gossip map, one of the most memory-hungry tests) for ~3 min alongside four other worker node-clusters.Five parallel ASan
lightningd+bitcoindclusters withtest_real_datain the mix peaks past 16GB, and the host force-terminates the VM.Why always ~10% on
ASan/UBSan (3/6):--test-group-random-seed=42(ci.yaml:771) fixes the shard's test set and order deterministically, so the shard hits its memory peak at the same point every run. Other runs hit the same wall on different heavy shards (e.g.Valgrind 10/12,12/12).The one thing not provable from the outside is OOM vs. a random hosted-runner reclaim, because GitHub does not expose the VM
dmesg. The concentration on only ASan/Valgrind plus the deterministic repro point argues strongly for resource exhaustion rather than random reclaim.Suggested fixes (cheapest first)
-n $(($(nproc) + 1))to-n $(nproc)or-n $(($(nproc) - 1))for those two jobs only. Fewer concurrent node-clusters means lower peak memory.ASAN_OPTIONS=quarantine_size_mb=64:malloc_context_size=5in the sanitizer job env.if: failure()step runningdmesg | grep -i oom || journalctl -k | tailso the next failure records the actual cause.Likely the same underlying overload as the timing-based flakes such as #9268 (an 11s delay to activate
connectdunder load). Related tracking issue: #9222.