Added Anti-Saveinstance

[NeonDeveloper-byte]

Notice

Added Save Instance Detection The video below was recorded by a friend testing the detection

56vbqm3.1.mp4

[bigbenster702]

I'd like to point out that it already does this(?)

Adonis/MainModule/Client/Plugins/Anti_Cheat.luau

Line 442 in a123e1b

if not isStudio and (findService(game, "VirtualUser") or findService(game, "VirtualInputManager") or findService(game, "UGCValidationService")) then

[NeonDeveloper-byte]

Screen.Recording.2026-04-06.064227.mp4

with normal adonis it does not detect saveinstance

[megakookie]

I'd like to point out that it already does this(?)

Adonis/MainModule/Client/Plugins/Anti_Cheat.luau

Line 442 in a123e1b

if not isStudio and (findService(game, "VirtualUser") or findService(game, "VirtualInputManager") or findService(game, "UGCValidationService")) then

No, it doesn't. Judging by how the current system is not stopping decomps in my testing. Same case with the recent guardsman v2. While I wouldn't recommend using the new detection method as it doesn't seem to be refined as much. From my testing, I couldnt decompile my baseplate with the anticheat from this pr enabled. Thus making it promising. No anticheat is perfect, but it can be improved.

[ImFirstPlace]

There is no setting for this, please wrap this code in a setting and default the setting to false. Also running a recursive complex math equation would be a more efficient way to crash someone's client.

[ImFirstPlace]

See comment below I the lines never got quoted in this comment

[ImFirstPlace]

This is not how you format code, aligning equals signs actually makes the code harder to read and violates styling rules.

[bigbenster702]

I'd like to point out that it already does this(?)

Adonis/MainModule/Client/Plugins/Anti_Cheat.luau

Line 442 in a123e1b

if not isStudio and (findService(game, "VirtualUser") or findService(game, "VirtualInputManager") or findService(game, "UGCValidationService")) then

No, it doesn't. Judging by how the current system is not stopping decomps in my testing. Same case with the recent guardsman v2. While I wouldn't recommend using the new detection method as it doesn't seem to be refined as much. From my testing, I couldnt decompile my baseplate with the anticheat from this pr enabled. Thus making it promising. No anticheat is perfect, but it can be improved.

Guardsman v2 doesn't have a built in anti-exploit, it is separate plugin and in testing so yeah it isn't gonna...? As for the pr maybe just that function that runs from that code needs to be fixed instead of adding a lot of extra stuff.

[NeonDeveloper-byte]

ok ive tested the anti-saveinstance again and i think it got patched

[GalacticInspired]

@Expertcoderz @coasterteam