You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: README.md
+7-1Lines changed: 7 additions & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -92,7 +92,13 @@ Performance comparison of different vision encoders using Attentive Probe evalua
92
92
93
93
Training on a mixed dataset of 740K samples from LLaVA-OneVision and 800K samples from LLaVA-Video SFT. The training pipeline proceeds directly to Stage 2 fine-tuning. We adopt a streamlined native-resolution strategy inspired by LLaVA-OneVision: when the input frame resolution matches the model's native input size, it is fed directly—without tiling or cropping—to evaluate the ViT's native resolution capability.
0 commit comments