Skip to content

🍒 Cherry pick PR #95233 to staging 🍒#95234

Closed
mountiny wants to merge 1 commit into
stagingfrom
cherry-pick-staging-95233-revert-94784
Closed

🍒 Cherry pick PR #95233 to staging 🍒#95234
mountiny wants to merge 1 commit into
stagingfrom
cherry-pick-staging-95233-revert-94784

Conversation

@mountiny

@mountiny mountiny commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🍒 Cherry pick #95233 to staging 🍒

Reverts PR #94784 on staging to resolve DeployBlocker Expensify/Expensify#655280 (LogAPI - Massive log message given from loginToAccountIDMap Onyx logging).

Explanation of Change

Same as #95233 — removes loginToAccountIDMap derived Onyx key and restores pre-94784 Attendee type/shape.

Fixed Issues

$ https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/655280

Tests

  1. Open the app on staging and sign in with an account that has many personal details / contacts.
  2. Navigate to any expense in a policy where attendees can be edited.
  3. Verify attendee names and avatars display correctly.
  4. Add or edit attendees and confirm they save without errors.
  5. Confirm no new LogAPI - Massive log message given alerts from [Onyx] set called for key: loginToAccountIDMap.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as Tests

QA Steps

Same as Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Removes the loginToAccountIDMap derived Onyx key and restores the
pre-94784 Attendee type/shape. Resolves conflicts with #94299 by
keeping the flaggedExpenses hook migration.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
(cherry picked from commit d877b2c)

(cherry-picked to staging by mountiny)

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@mountiny mountiny requested review from a team as code owners July 2, 2026 19:48
@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot removed request for a team July 2, 2026 19:49
@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested review from a team, heyjennahay and trjExpensify and removed request for a team and trjExpensify July 2, 2026 19:49
@mountiny mountiny closed this Jul 2, 2026

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 56ec162ddd

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

reportID: CONST.DEFAULT_NUMBER_ID.toString(),
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/prefer-nullish-coalescing
keyForList: attendee.email || attendee.displayName,
keyForList: String(attendee.accountID) || attendee.email || attendee.displayName,

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Preserve fallback keys for attendees without account IDs

When editing attendees saved in the restored pre-94784 shape, accountID is often absent; String(undefined) is still the truthy string "undefined", so every such initial attendee gets the same keyForList instead of falling back to email/displayName. The attendee picker uses this value as the list key, which can produce duplicate rows/incorrect rendering or toggling when multiple existing/name-only attendees are opened for editing.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Comment on lines +713 to +715
if (ownerAccountID !== undefined) {
// Normal case: filter by accountID
attendeesMinusOwnerCount = attendees.filter((a) => a?.accountID !== ownerAccountID).length;

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Fall back when attendee account IDs are missing

For existing/backend attendee objects that only have email/login (the restored attendee shape makes accountID optional), this branch runs whenever the expense report has an ownerAccountID and counts undefined !== ownerAccountID as a non-owner attendee. As a result, a required-attendees expense whose only attendee is the report owner can incorrectly clear missingAttendees until the attendee is re-saved with an account ID; fall back to login/email when an attendee lacks accountID.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant