minor formatting fixes again

Author: Fidget-Spinner

_posts/2025-03-08-apology-tail-call.md

@@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
 ---
 title: I'm Sorry for Python's tail-calling Interpreter's Results
-
 ---
+# I'm Sorry for Python's tail-calling Interpreter's Results
+
+08-Mar-2025
 
 This is my first blog post ever. I want to use it to say
 I'm truly sorry for communicating inaccurate results for

_posts/2025-07-05-jit-reflections.md

@@ -1,6 +1,9 @@
 ---
-title: Reflections on 2 years of CPython's JIT Compiler: The good, the bad, the ugly
+title: Reflections on 2 years of CPython's JIT Compiler---The good, the bad, the ugly
 ---
+# Reflections on 2 years of CPython's JIT Compiler: The good, the bad, the ugly
+
+5 July 2025
 
 This blog post includes my honest opinions on the CPython JIT. What I think we did well,
 what I think we could have done better. I'll also do some brief qualititative

_posts/2025-11-08-faster-jit-plan.md

@@ -1,6 +1,9 @@
 ---
 title: A Plan for 5-10%* Faster Free-Threaded JIT by Python 3.16
 ---
+# A Plan for 5-10%* Faster Free-Threaded JIT by Python 3.16
+
+08-Nov-2025
 
 During the Python Core Dev Sprint in Cambridge hosted by ARM, we planned to make the JIT in CPython 5% faster by 3.15 and 10% faster by 3.16. The planners present were Savannah Ostrowski, Mark Shannon, Ken Jin (me), Diego Russo and Brandt Bucher. We were accompanied by other CPython core team members as well.
 

_posts/2025-12-24-no-longer-sorry.md

@@ -1,6 +1,9 @@
 ---
 title: Python 3.15's interpreter for Windows x86-64 should hopefully be 15% faster
 ---
+# Python 3.15's interpreter for Windows x86-64 should hopefully be 15% faster
+
+24 December 2025
 
 Some time ago I posted an [apology piece](./2025-03-08-apology-tail-call.md)
 for Python's tail calling results. I apologized for communicating performance