fix rest of the links

Author: Fidget-Spinner

_posts/2025-11-08-faster-jit-plan.md

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ During the Python Core Dev Sprint in Cambridge hosted by ARM, we planned to make
 
 You might wonder: 5% seems awfully conservative. However, note that this figure is the *geometric mean*. The number can range from slower to significantly faster. All numbers are [pyperformance](https://github.com/python/pyperformance) figures.
 
-In my [previous blog post](./2025-07-05-jit-reflections.md), I talked about the Python 3.13 and 3.14 JIT's state. We're planning to change that for 3.15 and 3.16.
+In my [previous blog post]({{ site.baseurl }}/posts/jit-reflections.md), I talked about the Python 3.13 and 3.14 JIT's state. We're planning to change that for 3.15 and 3.16.
 
 ## The Plan for 3.15
 This is a paraphrase of what Savannah laid out [here](https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/139038). The difference is that I'm listing things in chronological order of what I expect will be merged into CPython.

_posts/2025-12-24-no-longer-sorry.md

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ title: Python 3.15's interpreter for Windows x86-64 should hopefully be 15% fast
 
 24 December 2025
 
-Some time ago I posted an [apology piece]({{ site.baseurl }}/apology-tail-call.md)
+Some time ago I posted an [apology piece]({{ site.baseurl }}/posts/apology-tail-call.md)
 for Python's tail calling results. I apologized for communicating performance
 results without noticing a compiler bug had occured.