Skip to content

images_lr and smpl_param #38

Description

@hjw114

I am currently working with the MVHuman dataset, specifically the images_lr frames and the corresponding smpl_param files. While exploring the data, I noticed that the number of SMPL parameter files does not match the number of frames in images_lr. For example, in subject 22236222, there are hundreds of images_lr frames, but only a subset of frames have corresponding SMPL .pkl files.

Could you please clarify the reason for this discrepancy? Is it due to SMPL fitting failures on certain frames, or is there another intended design choice in the dataset? Understanding this will help me properly align the frames and parameters for my experiments.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions