User Story
In order to transform more ISO records into valid dcatus 1.1, datagov wants to update the dcatus v1.1 contact point writer to allow position names to be used in lieu of a full name
Acceptance Criteria
[ACs should be clearly demoable/verifiable whenever possible. Try specifying them using BDD.]
Background
user has notified us that "several branches" of NOAA prefer to use a position name instead of a individual or org element to avoid changing records during turnover.
Security Considerations (required)
[Any security concerns that might be implicated in the change. "None" is OK, just be explicit here!]
Sketch
[Notes or a checklist reflecting our understanding of the selected approach]
User Story
In order to transform more ISO records into valid dcatus 1.1, datagov wants to update the dcatus v1.1 contact point writer to allow position names to be used in lieu of a full name
Acceptance Criteria
[ACs should be clearly demoable/verifiable whenever possible. Try specifying them using BDD.]
WHEN transformation happens
THEN position name will be used as the
fnwhen no individual or org is present[AND optionally another verifiable outcome]
Background
user has notified us that "several branches" of NOAA prefer to use a position name instead of a individual or org element to avoid changing records during turnover.
Security Considerations (required)
[Any security concerns that might be implicated in the change. "None" is OK, just be explicit here!]
Sketch
[Notes or a checklist reflecting our understanding of the selected approach]