test: skip uint64 in seeding random deviates

[beckermr]

Trying to see what is happening to the int64 tests.

[beckermr]

Alright this failure appears to be a change in JAX or numpy versions. Fun.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will improve performance by 43.55%

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
✅ 34 untouched benchmarks

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
⚡	WallTime	test_benchmarks_lanczos_interp[kval-no_conserve_dc-run]	59.4 µs	45 µs	+32.05%
⚡	WallTime	test_benchmark_moffat_init[run]	100.6 µs	64.5 µs	+56.05%

Tip

Curious why this is faster? Comment @codspeedbot explain why this is faster on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing try-int64-on-main (1b8eda9) with main (948d92b)¹}

Footnotes

1. No successful run was found on main (1b8eda9) during the generation of this report, so 948d92b was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩