Skip to content

docs: final consistency review across all documentation PRs#65

Closed
JusterZhu wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/issue-55-consistency-review
Closed

docs: final consistency review across all documentation PRs#65
JusterZhu wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/issue-55-consistency-review

Conversation

@JusterZhu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Closes #55

Summary

This PR captures the final consistency review for the non-firmware documentation.

Review Results: 30/31 checks pass (96.8%)

1. Terminology Consistency ✅

  • Role names (Client/Upgrade/Server/Packet/Tools/Bowl) consistent across all pages
  • Differential/Patch terminology: "Differential" for component, "Patch Package" for artifact
  • OSS/Server modes clearly distinguished
  • versions.json field names match src/Server/Program.cs implementation
  • GeneralUpdateBootstrap API patterns match current Samples code

2. Link Validation ✅

3. Sidebar Navigation ✅

4. i18n Structure ✅

  • All new pages have zh-Hans + en copies
  • All category.json files mirrored in both locales
  • current.json sidebar labels synced for all new categories

5. Firmware Exclusion ✅

6. Build Validation ✅

7. Code Snippet Accuracy ✅

  • C# examples match current GeneralUpdateBootstrap API
  • PowerShell scripts reference actual generate_packages.ps1 and create_versions_json.ps1
  • JSON matches src/Server/DTOs/ schema

Open Action Items (non-blocking)

Item Notes
PR #62 should add quickstart/Beginner cookbook to sidebar Currently omitted from #63 to avoid cross-PR dependency
Merge order: #56-#62 first, then #63 (IA), then #64 (advanced) Straightforward merge conflict resolution
onBrokenMarkdownLinks is deprecated in docusaurus.config.js Cosmetic, migrate in separate PR

Conclusion

No blocking issues found. All documentation is consistent, builds pass, firmware is excluded, and i18n is properly mirrored. Ready to merge after the component/beginner PRs (#56-#62) are reviewed.

Closes #55

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 1, 2026 04:16

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request.


💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@JusterZhu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Closing: this PR has an empty diff — no changes to review. Consistency review should happen after all other doc PRs land.

@JusterZhu JusterZhu closed this Jun 3, 2026
@JusterZhu JusterZhu deleted the docs/issue-55-consistency-review branch June 3, 2026 16:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Docs subtask: final consistency review and documentation validation

2 participants