In the lib/rdf/rdf_datatype/ directory there are the following classes defined:
«abstract»
RdfDatatype |
getUri()
unparse()
parse() |
| BaseDatatype (extends RdfDatatype) |
getUri()
unparse(value)
parse(str)
toString() |
| RdfDatatypeBase (extends RdfDatatype) |
| getUri() |
| RdfDatatypeLabel (extends RdfDatatypeBase) |
parse(str)
unparse(val) |
For me it seems like either RdfDatatypeBase and RdfDatatypeLabel or BaseDatatype is needed. Is there a reason for having all of them?
Moreover I'm wondering if we really need this class hierachy here, since it (IMHO) only complicates things unnecessarily.
In the
lib/rdf/rdf_datatype/directory there are the following classes defined:RdfDatatype
unparse()
parse()
unparse(value)
parse(str)
toString()
unparse(val)
For me it seems like either
RdfDatatypeBaseandRdfDatatypeLabelorBaseDatatypeis needed. Is there a reason for having all of them?Moreover I'm wondering if we really need this class hierachy here, since it (IMHO) only complicates things unnecessarily.