Skip to content

CodeQL security scan workflow yml added#4371

Merged
Maheshkale447 merged 6 commits into
masterfrom
security-scan
Nov 28, 2025
Merged

CodeQL security scan workflow yml added#4371
Maheshkale447 merged 6 commits into
masterfrom
security-scan

Conversation

@mohd-amdocs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Description

Type of Change

  • Bug fix - [ ] New feature - [ ] Breaking change - [ ] Plugin update

Checklist

  • PR description clearly describes the changes
  • Target branch is correct (master for features, Releases/* for fixes)
  • Latest code from target branch merged
  • No commented/junk code included
  • No new build warnings or errors
  • All existing unit tests pass
  • New unit tests added for new functionality
  • Cross-platform compatibility verified (Windows/Linux/macOS)
  • CI/CD pipeline passes
  • Code follows project conventions (Act{Platform}{Type}, {Platform}Driver)
  • Repository objects use [IsSerializedForLocalRepository] where needed
  • Error handling uses Reporter.ToLog() pattern
  • Documentation updated for user-facing changes
  • Self-review completed and code review comments addressed

@mohd-amdocs mohd-amdocs added the github_actions Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code label Nov 27, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 27, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Review was skipped due to path filters

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • .github/workflows/Old/codeql-analysis.yml is excluded by !**/*.yml
  • .github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml is excluded by !**/*.yml

CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including **/dist/** will override the default block on the dist directory, by removing the pattern from both the lists.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch security-scan

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

  • Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
  • Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
  • Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

  1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
  2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
  3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
  4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
    | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
  5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
    Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@Maheshkale447 Maheshkale447 merged commit b6ffcfa into master Nov 28, 2025
39 of 44 checks passed
@Maheshkale447 Maheshkale447 deleted the security-scan branch November 28, 2025 05:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

github_actions Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants