Skip to content

Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 560: Cross-site scripting#4490

Merged
ravirk91 merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
alert-autofix-560
Apr 29, 2026
Merged

Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 560: Cross-site scripting#4490
ravirk91 merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
alert-autofix-560

Conversation

@ravirk91
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@ravirk91 ravirk91 commented Apr 29, 2026

Potential fix for https://github.com/Ginger-Automation/Ginger/security/code-scanning/560

To fix this safely without changing functionality, encode the user-provided JSON string for HTML before packaging it into outbound content, so potentially executable markup characters are neutralized if the payload is ever rendered in an HTML context downstream. Since the recommendation explicitly points to System.Net.WebUtility, use WebUtility.HtmlEncode(...) on the finalized body right before constructing StringContent.

Best concrete change:

  • File: Ginger/GingerCoreNET/External/WireMock/WireMockAPI.cs
  • Method: CreateStubAsync(...)
  • Keep current JSON parse/normalization logic.
  • Add using System.Net;.
  • Replace new StringContent(body, Encoding.UTF8, contentType) with new StringContent(WebUtility.HtmlEncode(body), Encoding.UTF8, contentType).

This is minimal, localized, and does not alter control flow or error handling.

Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved request payload handling to properly encode special characters when transmitting stub mappings, ensuring data integrity during API communication.

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 29, 2026

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 1c25084d-1ce0-4890-8aff-1ccea15b5321

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 29052ac and d4efe11.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Ginger/GingerCoreNET/External/WireMock/WireMockAPI.cs

Walkthrough

The PR modifies WireMockAPI.CreateStubAsync to HTML-encode the request payload before constructing and posting it to the WireMock mappings endpoint. The change affects how the stub mapping is transmitted while maintaining existing control flow and error handling.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
WireMock Payload Encoding
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/External/WireMock/WireMockAPI.cs
HTML-encodes the request body parameter before constructing StringContent for the WireMock endpoint POST request.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 Hop along with HTML escapes so fine,
Ampersands dancing in each payload line,
WireMock mappings dressed up clean,
The prettiest stubs we've ever seen! ✨

✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  • Create stacked PR
  • Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch alert-autofix-560

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
Review rate limit: 0/1 reviews remaining, refill in 60 minutes.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@ravirk91 ravirk91 marked this pull request as ready for review April 29, 2026 10:34
@ravirk91 ravirk91 merged commit 049b738 into master Apr 29, 2026
5 of 7 checks passed
@ravirk91 ravirk91 deleted the alert-autofix-560 branch April 29, 2026 10:34
@codacy-production
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

🟢 Metrics 0 complexity

Metric Results
Complexity 0

View in Codacy

NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant