feat: Python sdk improvements based on load testing tests#315
Draft
pweiber wants to merge 2 commits into
Draft
Conversation
Signed-off-by: pweiber <periclesweiber@ciandt.com>
Signed-off-by: pweiber <periclesweiber@ciandt.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Aim to fixes #207
Keeping as a draft for now to explore more alternatives
Performing the load testing for the Python SDK we were able to identify that using the approaches below didn't improved the RPS and latency:
The current approach uses asyncaio and uvloop, we could see some improvements based on the current SDK
Scenario: 300s Duration, 2000 VUs, 60s Warmup, 4 CPU Cores, 2GB Memory
Basic Sample:
Old RPS: 1,412
New RPS: 7,174
Old P99 Latency: 1,620.54ms
New P99 Latency: 403.66ms
JWT Sample:
Old RPS: 1,086
New RPS: 2,882
Old P99 Latency: 2,178.73ms
New P99 Latency: 793.58ms