-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Implement node output destructuring #3806
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
JustJ01
wants to merge
8
commits into
GraphiteEditor:master
Choose a base branch
from
JustJ01:finish-deconstruct-outputs
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2e97e81
Add `Destruct` macro and trait for automatically acessing struct fields
TrueDoctor e215927
Complete node output destructuring implementation
JustJ01 f05970c
implemenet preprocessing expansion
JustJ01 f81c4da
formatted files
JustJ01 9db03a5
convert Split Vec2 and Split Channels to proto nodes
JustJ01 051b690
removed dead code
JustJ01 e5e4936
Merge branch 'master' into finish-deconstruct-outputs
Keavon 958810d
Potentially solve outstanding issues
Keavon File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why is this done here instea of in the generate_node_substitutions method?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is all out of my wheelhouse. If you're able to take it from here, I'd appreciate that. I basically just attempted to get it to work from a QA perspective without really understanding what's going on internally, since the alternative would have been to close the PR outright. Sorry I don't know the answer to the question, although it's probably worth fixing if it doesn't match your expectations.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I mean you made the changes you should be able to address comments regarding them. the generate substitutions functions is used in other places as well, and it looks to me like the changes should probably apply to all callers so it would likely make sense to integrate the changes in the function (or even better instead of first generating the substitutions and then filtering them out, we should just not generate them in the first place) I won't have time to take over the pr myself