📋 Issue Type
Feature / Methodology Hardening
🎯 Objective
Convert passive citation of Riksrevisionen (RiR) reports into active accountability tracking: log every RiR finding, the constitutional skrivelse-response deadline, and the government's response status, then propagate into intelligence-assessment KJs.
📊 Current State (evidence from 2026-04-26 reflections)
realtime-pulse/methodology-reflection.md Improvement 3: "Both HD01JuU31 (police reform) and HC03206 (civil defence) are Riksrevisionen findings cited without tracking whether the government has formally responded or published an action plan. Swedish constitutional practice requires a formal government response (skrivelse) to each RiR report within a defined period. Recommended improvement: Implement a standing RiR follow-up table in each realtime-pulse analysis that tracks: RiR report date, government skrivelse deadline, government response status, and parliamentary committee follow-up."
weekly-review/methodology-reflection.md: HC03206 (RiR audit) cited without follow-up status.
motions/methodology-reflection.md: HD01JuU31 with Riksrevisionen [A1] backing — but no follow-up timeline tracked.
🚀 Desired State
- New dataset
data/rir-followups.json: {rir_report_id, title, agency, publish_date, skrivelse_deadline, gov_response_status, response_skrivelse_id, parliamentary_followup_doc_ids[]}.
- Daily fetch via
riksdag-regering-search_dokument (doktyp=skr, subtyp=rsk etc.) to detect new responses.
- Auto-injected RiR-Follow-Up table in
intelligence-assessment.md whenever an RiR finding is referenced.
- Alert (issue auto-creation) when skrivelse deadline elapsed without response.
🔧 Implementation Approach
- Build deadline calculator (Swedish constitutional practice typically 4 months — confirm and parameterise).
- Wire into realtime-pulse, weekly-review, monthly-review workflows.
- Document in
legislative-monitoring skill.
🤖 Recommended Agent
intelligence-operative — accountability-monitoring methodology owner.
Co-owner: data-pipeline-specialist for fetch logic.
✅ Acceptance Criteria
📚 References
analysis/daily/2026-04-26/{realtime-pulse,weekly-review,motions}/methodology-reflection.md
- Skill:
legislative-monitoring, political-science-analysis
- ISMS: Information_Security_Policy.md
📋 Issue Type
Feature / Methodology Hardening
🎯 Objective
Convert passive citation of Riksrevisionen (RiR) reports into active accountability tracking: log every RiR finding, the constitutional skrivelse-response deadline, and the government's response status, then propagate into intelligence-assessment KJs.
📊 Current State (evidence from 2026-04-26 reflections)
realtime-pulse/methodology-reflection.mdImprovement 3: "Both HD01JuU31 (police reform) and HC03206 (civil defence) are Riksrevisionen findings cited without tracking whether the government has formally responded or published an action plan. Swedish constitutional practice requires a formal government response (skrivelse) to each RiR report within a defined period. Recommended improvement: Implement a standing RiR follow-up table in each realtime-pulse analysis that tracks: RiR report date, government skrivelse deadline, government response status, and parliamentary committee follow-up."weekly-review/methodology-reflection.md: HC03206 (RiR audit) cited without follow-up status.motions/methodology-reflection.md: HD01JuU31 with Riksrevisionen [A1] backing — but no follow-up timeline tracked.🚀 Desired State
data/rir-followups.json:{rir_report_id, title, agency, publish_date, skrivelse_deadline, gov_response_status, response_skrivelse_id, parliamentary_followup_doc_ids[]}.riksdag-regering-search_dokument(doktyp=skr,subtyp=rsketc.) to detect new responses.intelligence-assessment.mdwhenever an RiR finding is referenced.🔧 Implementation Approach
legislative-monitoringskill.🤖 Recommended Agent
intelligence-operative— accountability-monitoring methodology owner.Co-owner:
data-pipeline-specialistfor fetch logic.✅ Acceptance Criteria
data/rir-followups.jsonpopulated and CI-validatedlegislative-monitoringupdated📚 References
analysis/daily/2026-04-26/{realtime-pulse,weekly-review,motions}/methodology-reflection.mdlegislative-monitoring,political-science-analysis