You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
docs(review): close Sex and Gender external review call
- replace the generic post-close note with an admonition clarifying
that contributions remain welcome after a call closes
- mark the Sex and Gender call as closed in the community review page
and move it from the open to the closed calls list
- remove the homepage open-call banner for the Sex and Gender review
- rename the navigation entry from open to closed external review calls
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/contributing/call-for-community-review.md
+10-4Lines changed: 10 additions & 4 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -18,7 +18,11 @@ Contributors can choose whether they are acknowledged. By default, we will inclu
18
18
19
19
All instructions on how to collaborate in each external review, including access to materials and feedback channels, are provided in the description of the corresponding call listed below.
20
20
21
-
Although each call has an explicit opening and closing date, **contributions are welcome at any time**. Outside an active call, please use the general [Contribution Channels](contribution-channels.md); your input will still be reviewed and may lead to updates in future releases.
21
+
!!! info "Contributions remain welcome after a call closes"
22
+
23
+
The opening and closing dates define the formal external-review window for a package. They help manage the package's validation lifecycle and stage transitions, but they do **not** mean that feedback is no longer accepted.
24
+
25
+
You can still submit comments, questions, and suggestions at any time through the general [Contribution Channels](contribution-channels.md). Accepted input will be reviewed and may inform future revisions and releases.
22
26
23
27
During an **open** Call for Community Review, you can:
24
28
@@ -42,10 +46,10 @@ For the general case, including domains without an active call or any follow-up
@@ -60,10 +64,12 @@ For the general case, including domains without an active call or any follow-up
60
64
61
65
_This section lists currently active Calls for Community Review for specific HRIO domains or subdomains._
62
66
63
-
-[Sex and Gender](../../external-review/sex-and-gender/)
67
+
There are currently no active Calls for Community Review.
64
68
65
69
### Closed calls
66
70
67
71
_This section lists Calls for Community Review that have formally closed._
68
72
73
+
-[Sex and Gender](../../external-review/sex-and-gender/)
74
+
69
75
Feedback on these domains remains welcome. If you would like to comment on a domain that appears under a closed call, please submit your input via the general [Contribution Channels](contribution-channels.md) and reference the relevant domain or call in your submission.
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/index.md
+2-2Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
2
2
3
3
# Health-RI Semantic Interoperability Initiative
4
4
5
-
!!! open-call "OPEN CALL: validate the HRIO Sex and Gender Ontology"
5
+
<!--!!! open-call "OPEN CALL: validate the HRIO Sex and Gender Ontology"
6
6
7
7
We are running an external community review of the **Sex and Gender** package in HRIO.
8
8
Please help us validate the model and documentation.
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
13
13
14
14
[Call for Contribution Overview](contributing/call-for-community-review/){ .md-button .md-button--primary }
15
15
16
-
</div>
16
+
</div>-->
17
17
18
18
The health domain is shaped by many standards and models that guide the design of databases and the implementation of systems. They are applied in diverse contexts, from hospital records to research infrastructures. To enable effective data reuse, the data within these systems often needs to be exchanged, compared, and integrated. In other words, the data must be interoperable (fulfilling the "I" in FAIR).
0 commit comments