@@ -141,13 +141,24 @@ print(metadata)
141141```
142142``` output
143143OME(
144- experimenters=[{'id': 'Experimenter:0', 'user_name': 'Zeiss'}],
145- instruments=[<1 field_type>],
146- images=[<1 field_type>],
144+ plates=[<1 field_type>],
145+ experimenters=[{'id': 'Experimenter:Zeiss', 'user_name': 'Zeiss'}],
146+ instruments=[<1 field_type>],
147+ images=[<2 field_type>],
148+ structured_annotations={
149+ 'xml_annotations': [
150+ {
151+ 'description': 'ZEN 2012 (blue edition)1.1.1.0',
152+ 'id': 'urn:lsid:allencell.org:Annotation:AcquisitionSoftware',
153+ 'value': {},
154+ 'kind': 'xmlannotation'
155+ }
156+ ]
157+ }
147158)
148159```
149160
150- In this case, we can see it is split into three categories:
161+ In this case, we can see it is split into various categories including
151162` experimenters ` , ` images ` and ` instruments ` . You can look inside each of these
152163using ` .category ` e.g.:
153164``` python
@@ -174,7 +185,7 @@ processing steps don't overwrite this original image.
174185Explore the metadata in the console to answer the following
175186questions:
176187
177- - What type of microscope was used to take this image?
188+ - Which manufacturer made the microscope used to take this image?
178189- What detector was used to take this image?
179190- What does each channel show? For example, which fluorophore is used? What is
180191its excitation and emission wavelength? (hint: look inside the image's
@@ -184,10 +195,10 @@ pixel metadata: `metadata.images[0].pixels`)
184195
185196## Solution
186197
187- ### Microscope model
198+ ### Microscope manufacturer
188199
189- Under ` metadata.instruments[0].microscope ` , we can see that an 'Axio Imager Z2'
190- microscope was used .
200+ Under ` metadata.instruments[0].microscope ` , we can see that the microscope
201+ manufacturer was Zeiss .
191202
192203### Detector
193204Under ` metadata.instruments[0].detectors ` , we can see
@@ -196,18 +207,18 @@ that this used an HDCamC10600-30B (ORCA-R2) detector.
196207### Channels
197208
198209Under ` metadata.images[0].pixels.channels ` , we can see one entry per channel
199- - ` Channel:0 :0 ` , ` Channel:0:1 ` and ` Channel:0:2 ` .
210+ - ` Channel:1 :0 ` , ` Channel:2:0 ` and ` Channel:3:0 ` .
200211
201212In the first (` metadata.images[0].pixels.channels[0] ` ), we can see that its
202- ` name ` is TagYFP, a fluorophore with ` emission_wavelength ` of 524nm and
213+ ` fluor ` is TagYFP, a fluorophore with ` emission_wavelength ` of 524nm and
203214` excitation_wavelength ` of 508nm.
204215
205- In the first (` metadata.images[0].pixels.channels[1] ` ), we can see that its
206- ` name ` is mRFP1.2, a fluorophore with ` emission_wavelength ` of 612nm and
216+ In the second (` metadata.images[0].pixels.channels[1] ` ), we can see that its
217+ ` fluor ` is mRFP1.2, a fluorophore with ` emission_wavelength ` of 612nm and
207218` excitation_wavelength ` of 590nm.
208219
209- In the first (` metadata.images[0].pixels.channels[2] ` ), we see that its name
210- is ` TL DIC ` and no ` emission_wavelength ` or ` excitation_wavelength ` is listed.
220+ In the last (` metadata.images[0].pixels.channels[2] ` ), we see that no ` fluor ` ,
221+ ` emission_wavelength ` or ` excitation_wavelength ` is listed.
211222Its ` illumination_type ` is listed as 'transmitted', so this is simply an image
212223of the yeast cells with no fluorophores used.
213224
0 commit comments