-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Expand file tree
/
Copy path21-Existential-Risk-Category-List.html
More file actions
122 lines (119 loc) · 4.58 KB
/
21-Existential-Risk-Category-List.html
File metadata and controls
122 lines (119 loc) · 4.58 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<!-- Basic Meta Tags -->
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<!-- SEO Meta Tags -->
<meta name="description" content="Comprehensive AGI Risk Analysis">
<meta name="keywords" content="agi, risk, convergence">
<meta name="author" content="Forrest Landry">
<meta name="robots" content="index, follow">
<!-- Favicon -->
<link rel="icon" href="https://github.githubassets.com/favicons/favicon-dark.png" type="image/png">
<link rel="shortcut icon" href="https://github.githubassets.com/favicons/favicon-dark.png" type="image/png">
<!-- Page Title (displayed on the browser tab) -->
<title>Comprehensive AGI Risk Analysis</title>
</head>
<body>
<p>
TITL:
<b>Existential Risk Category List</b>
By Forrest Landry
Monday, Aug 24, 2015.
</p>
<p>
ABST:
As listing and defining a scale
of the relative intensity of
various kinds of x-risk severity.
</p>
<p>
TEXT:
</p>
<p>
> What are the existential x-risk event categories?
</p>
<p>
- Where estimating that the total level
of equivalent computational complexity
needing to model the total process of the planet,
(inclusive of all life on it, down to cell level)
is at least 10^19 lines of code, relative to a rock;
(ie; where having 'rock' as complexity level '1');.
- That the following four categories
of existential risk
are defined.
</p>
<p>
- <b>Category-4 Event</b>:.
- Temporary reduction to 10^17 complexity.
- in other words, an event involving overall 100 times
as much energy and intensity as a 'global catastrophe'.
- Significant (near total) loss of human life, planet wide.
- Possibility of recovery to present levels
of population and civilization
within 20,000 years.
- Example event; certain categories of biological warfare.
</p>
<p>
- <b>Category-3 Event</b>:.
- _Temporary_reduction_ to 10^14 complexity.
- as a 1000 times more intensity than a category 4 event.
- Significant (near total) loss of all life on the planet
(every blade of grass gone, most cockroaches dead, etc).
- that there is a slight possibility of natural recovery
to present levels of bio-diversity
within 20 million years.
- Example events:.
- grey goo.
</p>
<p>
- <b>Category-2 Event</b>:.
- _Permanent_reduction_ to 10^12 complexity or lower
- as 100X stronger than a category 3 event.
- as a Total and permanent loss
of all planetary life
above (and possibly including at) a single cellular level.
- No recovery likely,
though at least possible conceptually,
(assuming extensive external intervention).
- Example events:.
- AGI/APS total takeover.
- global thermal runaway.
</p>
<p>
- <b>Category-1 Event</b>:.
- _Terminal_Reduction_ to 10^6 complexity or lower
- as more than a billion billion times more impacting
than a global catastrophe.
- Total and permanent (unrecoverable, absolute) loss
of all known life; no exceptions.
- No remediation possible, even in concept.
- Example event; Dark Fire.
</p>
<p>
:
> - ?; Where would be all out Geo-thermal nuclear war
> be in this schema?.
</p>
<p>
A full exchange event would not register in this schema.
At best, a new, much weaker category
would need to be created,
somewhere at or beyond 'cat-7' perhaps.
Basically, full exchange, though terrible,
might not even qualify as a global catastrophe,
insofar as it mostly only affects human life
(ie; targets cities, rather than fertile bio-regions)
and the level of overall planetary bio complexity
is probably not actually that much affected
(unless, of course, the 'nuclear winter scenario'
actually turns out to be correct, then it becomes
possible that we are considering a cat-5 event).
To put it into context, such an event would have
mostly become unnoticeable in less than 2000 years.
</p>
</body>
</html>