|
| 1 | +# PROJECT Inbox Triage – 2026-01-02 |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +**Created:** 2026-01-02 |
| 4 | +**Status:** In Progress |
| 5 | +**Purpose:** Summarize recommended actions for each `PROJECT/1-INBOX` document so the maintainer can review and decide, one by one. |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +--- |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +## 1. CONSOLIDATION-COMPLETE.md |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +**File:** `PROJECT/1-INBOX/CONSOLIDATION-COMPLETE.md` |
| 12 | +**Type:** Update log for logic-duplication spec |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +### Observation |
| 15 | +- States that `LOGIC-DUPLICATION-UPDATES.md` has been merged into `PROJECT-LOGIC-DUPLICATION.md`. |
| 16 | +- Status inside file already says consolidation is **complete**. |
| 17 | +- `LOGIC-DUPLICATION-UPDATES.md` currently lives in `PROJECT/3-COMPLETED/` (summary of changes). |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +### Recommended Changes |
| 20 | +- Treat as a **completed documentation update**, not an active task. |
| 21 | +- Add/confirm frontmatter: |
| 22 | + - `Status: Completed` |
| 23 | + - `Completed: 2026-01-01` (or actual date) |
| 24 | +- **Move:** `CONSOLIDATION-COMPLETE.md` → `PROJECT/3-COMPLETED/`. |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +### Questions for You |
| 27 | +1. Do you want to keep this as a separate “update log” file, or fold its contents into the bottom of `PROJECT-LOGIC-DUPLICATION.md` under a "Document History" section and then archive/delete it? |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +--- |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +## 2. DRY-POC-SUMMARY.md |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +**File:** `PROJECT/1-INBOX/DRY-POC-SUMMARY.md` |
| 34 | +**Type:** Proof-of-concept summary for Magic String Detector (DRY) |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +### Observation |
| 37 | +- Status line: `Planning Complete – Ready for Implementation`. |
| 38 | +- Describes: |
| 39 | + - Planning doc: `NEXT-FIND-DRY.md`. |
| 40 | + - 3 DRY JSON patterns under `dist/patterns/dry/`. |
| 41 | + - `dist/patterns/dry/README.md` for documentation. |
| 42 | +- Lists remaining work: fixtures + aggregation wiring. |
| 43 | +- Codebase already contains DRY patterns/docs; there are also fixture-related reports in `PROJECT/3-COMPLETED/`. |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +### Recommended Changes |
| 46 | +- Treat this as a **completed POC planning+design summary**, not an active task. |
| 47 | +- Update status block to: |
| 48 | + - `Status: Completed` |
| 49 | + - Add a small **“Implementation Outcome”** subsection linking to: |
| 50 | + - `dist/patterns/dry/` JSONs |
| 51 | + - `dist/patterns/dry/README.md` |
| 52 | + - Any relevant `TEST_FIXTURES_*` docs if they cover DRY |
| 53 | +- **Move:** `DRY-POC-SUMMARY.md` → `PROJECT/3-COMPLETED/`. |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | +### Questions for You |
| 56 | +1. Is Phase 1 DRY (3 patterns + fixtures + aggregation) effectively shipped, or are fixtures/aggregation still partially TODO? |
| 57 | +2. Should we add a short "Shipped In" version tag here (e.g., `Shipped In: v1.0.xx`)? |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | +--- |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | +## 3. FIND-DRY.md |
| 62 | + |
| 63 | +**File:** `PROJECT/1-INBOX/FIND-DRY.md` |
| 64 | +**Type:** Generic DRY + architecture checker specification (repo-agnostic) |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | +### Observation |
| 67 | +- Large, general spec for a grep-first DRY/architecture checker. |
| 68 | +- Not specific to wp-code-check; more of a background design document. |
| 69 | +- You now have wp-code-check–specific DRY plan in `NEXT-FIND-DRY.md` and POC summary in `DRY-POC-SUMMARY.md`. |
| 70 | + |
| 71 | +### Recommended Changes |
| 72 | +- Reclassify as **reference/spec**, not an INBOX task. |
| 73 | +- Add a short header note: |
| 74 | + - `Status: Reference` |
| 75 | + - `Note: Background spec informing NEXT-FIND-DRY.md and DRY implementation.` |
| 76 | +- **Move:** `FIND-DRY.md` → `PROJECT/FIND-DRY.md` (root-level reference). |
| 77 | + |
| 78 | +### Questions for You |
| 79 | +1. Do you still actively iterate on this generic spec, or is it stable reference now? |
| 80 | +2. Do you want this re-titled to something like `PROJECT-DRY-ARCH-SPEC.md`, or keep the existing filename for now? |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | +--- |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | +## 4. GITHUB-ADD-ISSUE.md |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | +**File:** `PROJECT/1-INBOX/GITHUB-ADD-ISSUE.md` |
| 87 | +**Type:** Raw research note / web-scraped style answer |
| 88 | + |
| 89 | +### Observation |
| 90 | +- Describes third-party browser extensions for quickly creating GitHub issues. |
| 91 | +- No task framing (no status, acceptance criteria, or link to wp-code-check roadmap). |
| 92 | +- Looks more like an ad-hoc research answer than a concrete project task. |
| 93 | + |
| 94 | +### Recommended Changes |
| 95 | +Two options depending on whether you care about this item: |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | +**Option A – Archive as Cancelled** |
| 98 | +- Add frontmatter: |
| 99 | + - `Status: Cancelled` |
| 100 | + - `Cancelled Reason: Out of scope for wp-code-check core roadmap (developer tooling only).` |
| 101 | +- **Move:** `GITHUB-ADD-ISSUE.md` → `PROJECT/3-COMPLETED/` as an archived research note. |
| 102 | + |
| 103 | +**Option B – Keep as Deferred Idea** |
| 104 | +- Add frontmatter: |
| 105 | + - `Status: Deferred` |
| 106 | + - `Deferred Until: After v1.x baseline + DRY work` |
| 107 | + - `Deferred Reason: Nice-to-have productivity tool, not core functionality.` |
| 108 | +- Keep in `1-INBOX/` but clearly marked as deferred. |
| 109 | + |
| 110 | +### Questions for You |
| 111 | +1. Is "quick GitHub issue creation" something you realistically want to pursue as part of this repo, or should we mark it Cancelled and archive it? |
| 112 | + |
| 113 | +--- |
| 114 | + |
| 115 | +## 5. NEW-PATTERN-OPPORTUNITIES.md |
| 116 | + |
| 117 | +**File:** `PROJECT/1-INBOX/NEW-PATTERN-OPPORTUNITIES.md` |
| 118 | +**Type:** Pattern ideas from Woo All Products for Subscriptions audit |
| 119 | + |
| 120 | +### Observation |
| 121 | +- Lists 8+ pattern ideas with details (severity, rule IDs, proposed grep expressions). |
| 122 | +- Some entries already marked as COMPLETE or ENHANCED (e.g., unsanitized `$_GET`, admin capability checks). |
| 123 | +- Mix of: |
| 124 | + - Implemented patterns |
| 125 | + - Pending ideas |
| 126 | + - Future possibilities |
| 127 | + |
| 128 | +### Recommended Changes |
| 129 | +- Convert into a **pattern backlog / idea bank**, not an INBOX task. |
| 130 | +- Add a top-level **Status Summary** section grouping patterns into: |
| 131 | + - Implemented (with version numbers) |
| 132 | + - Pending / To Evaluate |
| 133 | + - Rejected / Low ROI |
| 134 | +- Add frontmatter: |
| 135 | + - `Status: Reference` |
| 136 | + - `Purpose: Backlog of potential detection rules derived from IRL audits.` |
| 137 | +- **Move:** `NEW-PATTERN-OPPORTUNITIES.md` → `PROJECT/NEW-PATTERN-OPPORTUNITIES.md` (root-level reference). |
| 138 | + |
| 139 | +### Questions for You |
| 140 | +1. Do you want to keep treating this as a living idea bank, updated as patterns ship, or should we snapshot it and spin off a smaller "NEXT-PATTERNS" task doc for near-term work? |
| 141 | + |
| 142 | +--- |
| 143 | + |
| 144 | +## 6. NEXT-BASELINE-ISSUE.md |
| 145 | + |
| 146 | +**File:** `PROJECT/1-INBOX/NEXT-BASELINE-ISSUE.md` |
| 147 | +**Type:** Support-style explanation of baseline behavior for a specific plugin |
| 148 | + |
| 149 | +### Observation |
| 150 | +- Reads like a conversation transcript explaining baseline behavior (69 baselined findings, 0 new). |
| 151 | +- Clarifies that behavior is correct but UX could be clearer. |
| 152 | +- Not structured as a spec (no acceptance criteria or implementation plan). |
| 153 | + |
| 154 | +### Recommended Changes |
| 155 | +If you want to preserve it: |
| 156 | +- Add frontmatter: |
| 157 | + - `Status: Completed` |
| 158 | + - `Type: Support Explanation / UX Note` |
| 159 | +- Add short summary section: |
| 160 | + - "Key UX Observations & Potential Improvements" (2–3 bullets). |
| 161 | +- **Move:** `NEXT-BASELINE-ISSUE.md` → `PROJECT/3-COMPLETED/`. |
| 162 | + |
| 163 | +If you don't need it: |
| 164 | +- Mark `Status: Cancelled` and archive in `3-COMPLETED/` (or delete). |
| 165 | + |
| 166 | +### Questions for You |
| 167 | +1. Would you like this turned into a more formal "Baseline UX / FAQ" entry under `PROJECT/` (e.g., `BASELINE-BEHAVIOR-FAQ.md`), or is the existing explanation enough and can be archived as-is? |
| 168 | + |
| 169 | +--- |
| 170 | + |
| 171 | +## 7. NEXT-CALIBRATION.md |
| 172 | + |
| 173 | +**File:** `PROJECT/1-INBOX/NEXT-CALIBRATION.md` |
| 174 | +**Type:** Calibration plan (false-positive reduction roadmap) |
| 175 | + |
| 176 | +### Observation |
| 177 | +- Status: `In Progress` (already in the file). |
| 178 | +- Phase 1 priorities 1–3.5 marked as COMPLETED. |
| 179 | +- Phase 2 / 3 tasks still open. |
| 180 | +- Multiple COMPLETED docs in `3-COMPLETED/` directly relate (fixtures eval, severity overrides, test fixtures reports). |
| 181 | + |
| 182 | +### Recommended Changes |
| 183 | +- This is an **active working document**. |
| 184 | +- Keep as the primary calibration tracker. |
| 185 | +- Update/confirm metadata: |
| 186 | + - `Status: In Progress` |
| 187 | + - Possibly `Assigned Version:` if you want a target. |
| 188 | +- **Move:** `NEXT-CALIBRATION.md` → `PROJECT/2-WORKING/NEXT-CALIBRATION.md`. |
| 189 | + |
| 190 | +### Questions for You |
| 191 | +1. Do you want to split out finished Phase 1 into a separate `CALIBRATION-PHASE-1-COMPLETED.md` summary, leaving this file only for future work (Phase 2/3)? |
| 192 | + |
| 193 | +--- |
| 194 | + |
| 195 | +## 8. NEXT-FIND-DRY.md |
| 196 | + |
| 197 | +**File:** `PROJECT/1-INBOX/NEXT-FIND-DRY.md` |
| 198 | +**Type:** WP Code Check–specific DRY implementation plan |
| 199 | + |
| 200 | +### Observation |
| 201 | +- Status: `Planning`. |
| 202 | +- Concrete 3-phase plan reusing existing pattern infrastructure. |
| 203 | +- `DRY-POC-SUMMARY.md` shows Phase 1 planning and pattern creation are done. |
| 204 | + |
| 205 | +### Recommended Changes |
| 206 | +- Treat this as a **completed planning spec** backing the DRY POC. |
| 207 | +- Add metadata: |
| 208 | + - `Status: Completed (Phase 1 Planning)` |
| 209 | + - Optional: `Linked Summary: DRY-POC-SUMMARY.md` |
| 210 | +- **Move:** `NEXT-FIND-DRY.md` → `PROJECT/NEXT-FIND-DRY.md` (root-level reference for DRY work). |
| 211 | + |
| 212 | +### Questions for You |
| 213 | +1. Do you want to keep Phases 2–3 in this same file, or spin them into a new `NEXT-DRY-EXPANSION.md` so this doc reflects "what we planned for Phase 1" only? |
| 214 | + |
| 215 | +--- |
| 216 | + |
| 217 | +## 9. PROJECT-LOGIC-DUPLICATION.md |
| 218 | + |
| 219 | +**File:** `PROJECT/1-INBOX/PROJECT-LOGIC-DUPLICATION.md` |
| 220 | +**Type:** Canonical spec for logic clone detection (grep+aggregation) |
| 221 | + |
| 222 | +### Observation |
| 223 | +- `LOGIC-DUPLICATION-UPDATES.md` (already in `3-COMPLETED/`) claims this doc has been updated with: |
| 224 | + - Real-world context |
| 225 | + - Adjusted timelines |
| 226 | + - Go/No-Go criteria |
| 227 | + - JSON schema example |
| 228 | + - Lessons learned from v1.0.73 |
| 229 | + - Integration checklist & WP-specific patterns |
| 230 | +- Implementation itself (duplicate-functions pattern, fixtures, wiring) is **not yet obviously present** from the high-level repo listing. |
| 231 | + |
| 232 | +### Recommended Changes |
| 233 | +Two paths, depending on your intent: |
| 234 | + |
| 235 | +**Option A – Treat as Ready-to-Start Implementation** |
| 236 | +- Add frontmatter: |
| 237 | + - `Status: Not Started` |
| 238 | + - `Priority: HIGH` |
| 239 | +- Keep in `1-INBOX/` for now as "next candidate big feature". |
| 240 | +- Add a small "Next Actions" list pointing to the concrete files from the integration checklist. |
| 241 | + |
| 242 | +**Option B – Move to Active Work** |
| 243 | +- If you intend to start implementation soon: |
| 244 | + - Set `Status: In Progress`. |
| 245 | + - **Move:** `PROJECT-LOGIC-DUPLICATION.md` → `PROJECT/2-WORKING/`. |
| 246 | + |
| 247 | +### Questions for You |
| 248 | +1. Is logic-clone detection something you want to start in the current milestone (then we move it to `2-WORKING`), or should it remain a high-priority backlog item in `1-INBOX`? |
| 249 | + |
| 250 | +--- |
| 251 | + |
| 252 | +## 10. LOGIC-DUPLICATION-UPDATES.md (Context Check) |
| 253 | + |
| 254 | +**File:** `PROJECT/3-COMPLETED/LOGIC-DUPLICATION-UPDATES.md` |
| 255 | +**Type:** Summary of updates applied to `PROJECT-LOGIC-DUPLICATION.md` |
| 256 | + |
| 257 | +### Observation |
| 258 | +- Already in `3-COMPLETED/`. |
| 259 | +- Describes how the feasibility study was updated to align with proven v1.0.73 architecture. |
| 260 | + |
| 261 | +### Recommended Changes |
| 262 | +- No folder move needed (already COMPLETED). |
| 263 | +- Optional: Add at top: |
| 264 | + - `Status: Completed` |
| 265 | + - `Linked Spec: PROJECT-LOGIC-DUPLICATION.md`. |
| 266 | + |
| 267 | +### Questions for You |
| 268 | +1. Do you want `CONSOLIDATION-COMPLETE.md` and `LOGIC-DUPLICATION-UPDATES.md` eventually merged into a single "Document History" section inside `PROJECT-LOGIC-DUPLICATION.md`? |
| 269 | + |
| 270 | +--- |
| 271 | + |
| 272 | +## Next Steps Checklist (For You) |
| 273 | + |
| 274 | +You can now go through each item and decide: |
| 275 | + |
| 276 | +- [ ] **CONSOLIDATION-COMPLETE.md** – Archive to COMPLETED? Merge into spec? |
| 277 | +- [ ] **DRY-POC-SUMMARY.md** – Mark Completed + move to COMPLETED? |
| 278 | +- [ ] **FIND-DRY.md** – Move to PROJECT root as reference? |
| 279 | +- [ ] **GITHUB-ADD-ISSUE.md** – Cancel & archive, or defer? |
| 280 | +- [ ] **NEW-PATTERN-OPPORTUNITIES.md** – Convert to pattern backlog and move to PROJECT root? |
| 281 | +- [ ] **NEXT-BASELINE-ISSUE.md** – Archive as support note or convert to FAQ? |
| 282 | +- [ ] **NEXT-CALIBRATION.md** – Move to 2-WORKING as active calibration driver? |
| 283 | +- [ ] **NEXT-FIND-DRY.md** – Mark Phase 1 planning completed and move to PROJECT root? |
| 284 | +- [ ] **PROJECT-LOGIC-DUPLICATION.md** – Keep as backlog or promote to 2-WORKING? |
| 285 | + |
| 286 | +If you confirm your decisions on each bullet, I can apply the moves, add the frontmatter changes, and keep everything consistent with the `AGENTS.md` workflow rules. |
0 commit comments