Skip to content

Commit e006d48

Browse files
authored
Revise Statement of Need to highlight OneCite's features
Updated the Statement of Need section to include the role of OneCite as a verification tool and its functionality in resolving identifiers to structured BibTeX.
1 parent e5934f2 commit e006d48

1 file changed

Lines changed: 1 addition & 3 deletions

File tree

README.md

Lines changed: 1 addition & 3 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -43,9 +43,7 @@
4343

4444
## Statement of Need
4545

46-
Researchers frequently accumulate reference lists in ad-hoc formats — DOIs copied from browser tabs, arXiv IDs from paper PDFs, titles typed by hand, and BibTeX fragments from various sources. Cleaning these into a consistent, complete `.bib` file is tedious and error-prone.
47-
48-
OneCite solves this by accepting **any mix of identifiers and text queries** and automatically resolving them to structured BibTeX through a pipeline of academic APIs (CrossRef, arXiv, PubMed, Semantic Scholar, and others). It is designed for researchers who work primarily in the terminal, use LaTeX, and want a lightweight, scriptable tool — not a full reference manager.
46+
Researchers frequently accumulate reference lists in ad-hoc formats — DOIs copied from browser tabs, arXiv IDs from paper PDFs, titles typed by hand, and BibTeX fragments from various sources. Cleaning these into a consistent, complete `.bib` file is tedious and error-prone. However, in the era of Generative AI, compiling a bibliography is no longer just about formatting—it is about **verification**. **OneCite acts as the firewall between AI outputs and your manuscript.** By serving as a deterministic truth-detector at the API-lookup layer, OneCite takes raw, unverified text and cross-checks every single entry against canonical academic databases (CrossRef, PubMed, arXiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.).
4947

5048
**When to use OneCite vs. alternatives:**
5149

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)