Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 22, 2024. It is now read-only.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
10 changes: 8 additions & 2 deletions README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -33,13 +33,18 @@ This table contains the first set of terms that we’ve made a decision on. As m
| --- | --- | ----- | ----- |
|blacklist|blocklist|A list of items, such as usernames, email addresses, or IP addresses, that are denied access to a certain system or function. When a blocklist is used for access control, all entities are allowed access, except for those that are included in the blocklist.|As a pair, "blacklist" and "whitelist" promote racial bias by implying that black is bad and white is good. When the terms 'white' or 'black' are used in a context where white is represented as good or black is represented as bad, this usage reinforces a model that promotes racial bias.|
|whitelist|allowlist|A list of items, such as usernames, email addresses, or IP addresses, that are granted access to a certain system or function. When an allowlist is used for access control, all entities are denied access, except for those that are included in the allowlist.|As a pair, "blacklist" and "whitelist" promote racial bias by implying that black is bad and white is good. When the terms 'white' or 'black' are used in a context where white is represented as good or black is represented as bad, this usage reinforces a model that promotes racial bias.|
slave|Use the appropriate replacement for your domain, such as "worker", "child", "helper", "replica", "follower", or "secondary [server, node, process, or other noun]"|An entity, such as a device or process, that is dependent on or controlled by another entity.|The use of the term "slave" in an IT context diminishes the horror of the dehumanizing practice of slavery.
|slave|Use the appropriate replacement for your domain, such as "worker", "child", "helper", "replica", "follower", or "secondary [server, node, process, or other noun]"|An entity, such as a device or process, that is dependent on or controlled by another entity.|The use of the term "slave" in an IT context diminishes the horror of the dehumanizing practice of slavery.
|master (when paired with slave)|Use the appropriate replacement for your domain, such as "controller", "leader", "manager", "main", "coordinator", "parent", or "primary [server, node, process, or other noun]"|An entity, such as a device or process that controls another or is an authoritative source|The use of "master" with the term "slave" in an IT context diminishes the dehumanizing practice of slavery. Do not use "master" when a pairing with "slave" is either explicit or implied. Use of the term "master" is acceptable if it is not paired with "slave" and when it is not used to convey power or control over another entity. Context is key. Examples of acceptable uses of "master" include: master data management, master inventor, master’s degree|
|black hat hacker|attacker|An unauthorized entity that exploits vulnerabilities in a system with criminal intent.|When the terms 'white' or 'black' are used in a context where white is represented as good or black is represented as bad, this usage reinforces a model that promotes racial bias. The terms "white hat" and "black hat" promote racial bias because black is used to indicate malevolence while white indicates ethical, positive behavior.|
|white hat hacker|offensive security researcher|A hacker who breaks into organizations or targets with the goal of uncovering risky vulnerabilities that criminal attackers might exploit for personal gain.|
|Chinese wall|Use "ethical wall" or "firewall"|An information barrier that prevents exchanges or communication that could lead to conflicts of interest.|This term, when used to describe an information barrier between parties, is outdated and might be perceived as culturally insensitive or offensive because it inappropriately refers to ethnicity.|
|man hour, man day|Use "person hour", "person day" “full-time equivalent (FTE) day”, or “full-time equivalent (FTE) hour|A unit of work that can be completed by an average worker in the specified time period.|These terms use "man" to represent all workers, which is biased and exclusionary.|
|segregation|Use "separation" or "segmentation"||This term refers to a process that violates human rights by limiting access to privileges and rights such as education and voting.|
|pow wow|Use "meeting", "brainstorming session", or other appropriate term||A pow wow is a sacred gathering in Indigenous communities and should not be used as a business term.|
|totem pole|Use "hierarchy" or "rank"||Do not use in phrases such as "bottom of the totem pole" or "low man on the totem pole". A totem pole is a sacred object in Indigenous communities and the bottom of the totem pole has a specific symbolic meaning.|
|tribe|Use "squad" or "team"||Do not use to refer to a group formed to accomplish a task. Use another term such as "squad" or "team". "Tribe" is a term that can be associated with colonialism or can be considered cultural appropriation.|
|sanity test|Use "test"||This term might be derogatory to neurodiverse people. Jargon, such as "sanity test", is difficult to translate and is difficult to understand by readers whose first language is not English.|
|Scrum Master|Use only to refer to someone who has attained Professional Scrum Master certification. Otherwise use scrum leader.||This term uses "master" in an ambiguous way that can be interpreted as a reference to slavery.|

## **What action is required for IBM Business Partners and Intellectual Property Partners (IPPs)?**
IBM Business Partners and Intellectual Property Partners (IPPs) are not contractually required to remove biased terminology. However, IBM encourages our partners to review their terminology on a voluntary basis to ensure that the language used in products and content supports racial and cultural inclusivity. Many organizations across the IT industry are engaging in this important movement to replace biased terminology.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -112,6 +117,7 @@ The following terms were submitted for review and were approved for continued us
|master inventor|No change recommended|This term does not fall under the criteria for replacing the term "master". It refers to a level of skill rather than a dominate/subordinate relationship.|
|parent/child|No change recommended|Although the relationship of parent and child is one of dependency, it is appropriate. Parents do have legal rights over children until a certain age, so it is a natural dependency relationship. Children falling victim to adult power is not the main result of this relationship, so this term does not represent an abuse of power typically.|
|POC (proof of concept)|No change recommended|This is a general business term that originates outside of IT. The context is widely known and is key here. This is not likely to be confused with "person of color". It's common and acceptable for acronyms and abbreviations to have multiple full forms.|
quarantine|No change recommended|Quarantine is a temporary measure that doesn't deprive people of rights and privileges permanently or long term the way that segregation does.|
|red team|No change recommended.|This use of "red" does not refer to Indigenous people and does not reinforce a negative stereotype.|
|religiously (meaning with discipline but also potentially offending to atheists)|No change recommended|This term is not considered offensive.|
|white box|No change recommended|There is no need to change white box because black box refers to opacity, such as details that aren't visible or are not the focus. It is not based on a good/bad binary and so does not fall under our guiding principle for black and white terms.|
Expand All @@ -120,4 +126,4 @@ The following terms were submitted for review and were approved for continued us
|white label|No change recommended|The guiding principle on black and white terms does not apply (see entry for "blacklist").|
|white paper|No change recommended|This term is out of the scope of the review board because it is not an IT term. It is used by governments and other industries. Furthermore, the guiding principle on black and white terms does not apply (see entry for "blacklist").|
|white space|No change recommended|This term is not based on a good/bad binary and so does not fall under our guiding principle for black and white terms (see "blacklist").|
|red team|No change recommended.|This use of "red" does not refer to Indigenous people and does not reinforce a negative stereotype.|
|whiten|No change recommended.|In this case "white" is used as a reference to "white noise". "White" here refers to randomness and is is not represented as "good" so our principle does not apply (see entry for blacklist).|