Skip to content

API analyzer adjustments 19.1#15451

Merged
damyanpetev merged 4 commits into19.1.xfrom
dpetev/api-analyzer-adjustments-19.1
Mar 10, 2025
Merged

API analyzer adjustments 19.1#15451
damyanpetev merged 4 commits into19.1.xfrom
dpetev/api-analyzer-adjustments-19.1

Conversation

@damyanpetev
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Resolving filter operands method access from #14647 (comment) & move navigation overrides from #15201 to existing ctor props so they don't affect the analyzer.

Additional information (check all that apply):

  • Bug fix
  • New functionality
  • Documentation
  • Demos
  • CI/CD

Checklist:

  • All relevant tags have been applied to this PR
  • This PR includes unit tests covering all the new code (test guidelines)
  • This PR includes API docs for newly added methods/properties (api docs guidelines)
  • This PR includes feature/README.MD updates for the feature docs
  • This PR includes general feature table updates in the root README.MD
  • This PR includes CHANGELOG.MD updates for newly added functionality
  • This PR contains breaking changes
  • This PR includes ng update migrations for the breaking changes (migrations guidelines)
  • This PR includes behavioral changes and the feature specification has been updated with them

@damyanpetev damyanpetev changed the title Dpetev/api analyzer adjustments 19.1 API analyzer adjustments 19.1 Mar 4, 2025
gedinakova
gedinakova previously approved these changes Mar 5, 2025
@damyanpetev damyanpetev force-pushed the dpetev/api-analyzer-adjustments-19.1 branch from 5e92f8d to 3327fbc Compare March 10, 2025 07:38
@damyanpetev damyanpetev marked this pull request as ready for review March 10, 2025 07:40
@damyanpetev damyanpetev mentioned this pull request Mar 10, 2025
14 tasks
@damyanpetev damyanpetev merged commit 9898d98 into 19.1.x Mar 10, 2025
5 checks passed
@damyanpetev damyanpetev deleted the dpetev/api-analyzer-adjustments-19.1 branch March 10, 2025 15:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants