|
| 1 | +package cmd |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +// claim_login_test.go — integration coverage for the CLI "claim" path. |
| 4 | +// |
| 5 | +// The CLI has NO standalone `claim` command. Anonymous resources are claimed |
| 6 | +// as a side effect of the login device-flow: `runLogin` does |
| 7 | +// POST /auth/cli → {session_id, auth_url} |
| 8 | +// GET /auth/cli/{id} → 202 (pending) … then 200 {api_key, …, claimed_tokens} |
| 9 | +// and on success surfaces the count of newly-claimed anonymous tokens to the |
| 10 | +// user ("N anonymous resource token(s) claimed to your account."). |
| 11 | +// |
| 12 | +// The existing login tests (login_poll_test.go, login_timeout_test.go, |
| 13 | +// coverage_login_test.go, coverage_push95_test.go) already exercise the poll |
| 14 | +// HELPERS and the runLogin happy/error BRANCHES — but every runLogin test |
| 15 | +// asserts only `err == nil` and discards stdout. None of them prove the |
| 16 | +// user-visible claim output is correct. Per CLAUDE.md rule 12 ("Shipped ≠ |
| 17 | +// Verified": the verification surface MUST match the failure surface), a green |
| 18 | +// `runLogin` is not proof the user sees their claimed-token count. This file |
| 19 | +// closes that gap: it captures stdout and asserts the rendered claim line for |
| 20 | +// the multi-token, zero-token, and pending-then-success (multi-poll) cases, |
| 21 | +// and verifies credentials are persisted to the local config. |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +import ( |
| 24 | + "fmt" |
| 25 | + "net/http" |
| 26 | + "net/http/httptest" |
| 27 | + "strings" |
| 28 | + "sync/atomic" |
| 29 | + "testing" |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | + "github.com/InstaNode-dev/cli/internal/cliconfig" |
| 32 | +) |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | +const ( |
| 35 | + // claimLineSuffix is the trailing, count-agnostic portion of the line |
| 36 | + // runLogin prints when one or more anonymous tokens are claimed (login.go |
| 37 | + // ~line 116). Asserting against this fragment keeps the test resilient to |
| 38 | + // count changes while still pinning the user-visible claim message. |
| 39 | + claimLineSuffix = "anonymous resource token(s) claimed to your account." |
| 40 | + // loggedInPrefix is the success banner runLogin always prints. |
| 41 | + loggedInPrefix = "Logged in as" |
| 42 | + // claimTestEmail / claimTestAPIKey are the synthetic identity the stub |
| 43 | + // returns on a completed login. |
| 44 | + claimTestEmail = "claimer@instanode.dev" |
| 45 | + claimTestAPIKey = "inst_claim_test_key" |
| 46 | + claimTestTier = "pro" |
| 47 | + claimTestTeam = "Claim Team" |
| 48 | +) |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | +// claimStubBody returns the JSON body the stub /auth/cli/{id} endpoint serves |
| 51 | +// on completion, with the given claimed-token list. A nil/empty list models a |
| 52 | +// login that claimed nothing (the user had no local anonymous tokens, or they |
| 53 | +// were already associated). |
| 54 | +func claimStubBody(t *testing.T, claimed []string) string { |
| 55 | + t.Helper() |
| 56 | + tokensJSON := "[]" |
| 57 | + if len(claimed) > 0 { |
| 58 | + quoted := make([]string, len(claimed)) |
| 59 | + for i, tok := range claimed { |
| 60 | + quoted[i] = fmt.Sprintf("%q", tok) |
| 61 | + } |
| 62 | + tokensJSON = "[" + strings.Join(quoted, ",") + "]" |
| 63 | + } |
| 64 | + return fmt.Sprintf( |
| 65 | + `{"api_key":%q,"email":%q,"tier":%q,"team_name":%q,"claimed_tokens":%s}`, |
| 66 | + claimTestAPIKey, claimTestEmail, claimTestTier, claimTestTeam, tokensJSON, |
| 67 | + ) |
| 68 | +} |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | +// claimLoginServer mounts a device-flow stub: POST /auth/cli yields a session, |
| 71 | +// and GET /auth/cli/{id} returns 202 `pendingPolls` times before serving the |
| 72 | +// completed body (with the supplied claimed tokens). pendingPolls=0 means the |
| 73 | +// very first poll succeeds. |
| 74 | +func claimLoginServer(t *testing.T, claimed []string, pendingPolls int32) *httptest.Server { |
| 75 | + t.Helper() |
| 76 | + var polls int32 |
| 77 | + return httptest.NewServer(http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) { |
| 78 | + switch { |
| 79 | + case r.URL.Path == "/auth/cli" && r.Method == http.MethodPost: |
| 80 | + writeJSON(w, http.StatusOK, map[string]string{ |
| 81 | + "session_id": "sess_claim_test", |
| 82 | + "auth_url": "https://instanode.dev/cli-auth?s=claim", |
| 83 | + }) |
| 84 | + case strings.HasPrefix(r.URL.Path, "/auth/cli/") && r.Method == http.MethodGet: |
| 85 | + if atomic.AddInt32(&polls, 1) <= pendingPolls { |
| 86 | + w.WriteHeader(http.StatusAccepted) |
| 87 | + return |
| 88 | + } |
| 89 | + w.Header().Set("Content-Type", "application/json") |
| 90 | + w.WriteHeader(http.StatusOK) |
| 91 | + _, _ = w.Write([]byte(claimStubBody(t, claimed))) |
| 92 | + default: |
| 93 | + http.NotFound(w, r) |
| 94 | + } |
| 95 | + })) |
| 96 | +} |
| 97 | + |
| 98 | +// TestClaimOnLogin_SurfacesClaimedCount is the headline case: a successful |
| 99 | +// device-flow login that claims two anonymous tokens MUST report the count to |
| 100 | +// the user AND persist the new credentials. This is the assertion the existing |
| 101 | +// runLogin tests are missing — they let the print branch run but never read it. |
| 102 | +func TestClaimOnLogin_SurfacesClaimedCount(t *testing.T) { |
| 103 | + withCleanState(t) |
| 104 | + srv := claimLoginServer(t, []string{"tok_a", "tok_b"}, 0) |
| 105 | + defer srv.Close() |
| 106 | + withTestAPI(t, srv.URL) |
| 107 | + |
| 108 | + var runErr error |
| 109 | + stdout, _ := captureStdout(t, func() { |
| 110 | + runErr = runLogin(nil, nil) |
| 111 | + }) |
| 112 | + if runErr != nil { |
| 113 | + t.Fatalf("runLogin: %v", runErr) |
| 114 | + } |
| 115 | + |
| 116 | + // User-visible claim line must report the exact count of claimed tokens. |
| 117 | + wantClaim := fmt.Sprintf("2 %s", claimLineSuffix) |
| 118 | + if !strings.Contains(stdout, wantClaim) { |
| 119 | + t.Errorf("stdout missing claim line %q; got:\n%s", wantClaim, stdout) |
| 120 | + } |
| 121 | + if !strings.Contains(stdout, loggedInPrefix) { |
| 122 | + t.Errorf("stdout missing login banner %q; got:\n%s", loggedInPrefix, stdout) |
| 123 | + } |
| 124 | + |
| 125 | + // Credentials from the claimed login must be persisted so subsequent |
| 126 | + // authenticated calls (and the claimed resources) are usable. |
| 127 | + cfg, err := cliconfig.Load() |
| 128 | + if err != nil { |
| 129 | + t.Fatalf("reload config: %v", err) |
| 130 | + } |
| 131 | + if cfg.APIKey != claimTestAPIKey { |
| 132 | + t.Errorf("APIKey not persisted: got %q want %q", cfg.APIKey, claimTestAPIKey) |
| 133 | + } |
| 134 | + if cfg.Email != claimTestEmail { |
| 135 | + t.Errorf("Email not persisted: got %q want %q", cfg.Email, claimTestEmail) |
| 136 | + } |
| 137 | + if cfg.Tier != claimTestTier { |
| 138 | + t.Errorf("Tier not persisted: got %q want %q", cfg.Tier, claimTestTier) |
| 139 | + } |
| 140 | +} |
| 141 | + |
| 142 | +// TestClaimOnLogin_ZeroClaimedTokens pins the empty-claim contract: a login |
| 143 | +// that claims nothing (`claimed_tokens: []`) must NOT print a claim line. |
| 144 | +// Printing "0 ... claimed" would be a misleading regression — the existing |
| 145 | +// suite's anonymous case never asserts the absence of this line. |
| 146 | +func TestClaimOnLogin_ZeroClaimedTokens(t *testing.T) { |
| 147 | + withCleanState(t) |
| 148 | + srv := claimLoginServer(t, nil, 0) |
| 149 | + defer srv.Close() |
| 150 | + withTestAPI(t, srv.URL) |
| 151 | + |
| 152 | + var runErr error |
| 153 | + stdout, _ := captureStdout(t, func() { |
| 154 | + runErr = runLogin(nil, nil) |
| 155 | + }) |
| 156 | + if runErr != nil { |
| 157 | + t.Fatalf("runLogin: %v", runErr) |
| 158 | + } |
| 159 | + |
| 160 | + if strings.Contains(stdout, claimLineSuffix) { |
| 161 | + t.Errorf("expected NO claim line for zero claimed tokens; got:\n%s", stdout) |
| 162 | + } |
| 163 | + // The login itself still succeeds and reports the account. |
| 164 | + if !strings.Contains(stdout, loggedInPrefix) { |
| 165 | + t.Errorf("stdout missing login banner %q; got:\n%s", loggedInPrefix, stdout) |
| 166 | + } |
| 167 | +} |
| 168 | + |
| 169 | +// TestClaimOnLogin_PendingThenClaimed is the realistic edge case: the user |
| 170 | +// takes a few seconds to finish the browser flow, so the CLI sees several 202 |
| 171 | +// "pending" polls before the 200 that carries claimed_tokens. The claim count |
| 172 | +// must survive the multi-poll path and still surface correctly. Uses the |
| 173 | +// var-overridable poll cadence so the 202s don't burn real seconds. |
| 174 | +func TestClaimOnLogin_PendingThenClaimed(t *testing.T) { |
| 175 | + withCleanState(t) |
| 176 | + withShortPolls(t) |
| 177 | + srv := claimLoginServer(t, []string{"tok_only"}, 3) |
| 178 | + defer srv.Close() |
| 179 | + withTestAPI(t, srv.URL) |
| 180 | + |
| 181 | + var runErr error |
| 182 | + stdout, _ := captureStdout(t, func() { |
| 183 | + runErr = runLogin(nil, nil) |
| 184 | + }) |
| 185 | + if runErr != nil { |
| 186 | + t.Fatalf("runLogin after pending polls: %v", runErr) |
| 187 | + } |
| 188 | + |
| 189 | + wantClaim := fmt.Sprintf("1 %s", claimLineSuffix) |
| 190 | + if !strings.Contains(stdout, wantClaim) { |
| 191 | + t.Errorf("stdout missing single-token claim line %q; got:\n%s", wantClaim, stdout) |
| 192 | + } |
| 193 | +} |
0 commit comments