Renamed Deontic to Modal in constitutive syntax layer.

Author: chrfrantz

IG Core/IG Core Constitutive Component Relationship.json

@@ -234,9 +234,6 @@
       }, {
         "tag_name" : "(Cex) Execution Constraint",
         "tag_description" : "Execution constraints describe qualifications of the constitutive function or offer further contextual characterization."
-      }, {
-        "tag_name" : "(D) Deontic",
-        "tag_description" : "A prescriptive operator that describes whether the Aim (for regulative statements) of an institutional statement is permitted (e.g., may), obliged (e.g., shall, must), or forbidden (e.g., shall not, must not). For constitutive statements, the deontic parameterizes the constitutive function."
       }, {
         "tag_name" : "(E) Constituted Entity",
         "tag_description" : "Entity that is defined or modified by constitutive statement"
@@ -246,6 +243,9 @@
       }, {
         "tag_name" : "(F) Constitutive Function",
         "tag_description" : "Functionally constitutes a Constituted Entity (with or without reference to constituting properties)"
+      }, {
+        "tag_name" : "(M) Modal",
+        "tag_description" : "A modal operator that signals the necessity (often: shall) or (im-)possibility (often: may) of the action captured in the constitutive function in an epistemic sense (in contrast to the deontic sense for regulative statements)."
       }, {
         "tag_name" : "(P) Constituting Property",
         "tag_description" : "Constituting Properties capture related or constituent properties that are linked to the constituted entity via the constituting function. It is polymorphic in nature and dependent on the applied constitutive function."
@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@
     "link_type_name" : null,
     "link_type_role_feature_name" : null,
     "link_type_target_feature_name" : null,
-    "traits" : "{\"multipleRows\":false,\"collapsedRows\":1,\"expandedRows\":1,\"keyBindings\":[{\"keyCombo\":\"d\",\"value\":\"(D) Deontic\"},{\"keyCombo\":\"e\",\"value\":\"(E) Constituted Entity\"},{\"keyCombo\":\"r\",\"value\":\"(E, prop) Constituted Entity Property\"},{\"keyCombo\":\"f\",\"value\":\"(F) Constitutive Function\"},{\"keyCombo\":\"p\",\"value\":\"(P) Constituting Property\"},{\"keyCombo\":\"o\",\"value\":\"(P, prop) Constituting Property Property\"},{\"keyCombo\":\"c\",\"value\":\"(Cac) Activation Condition\"},{\"keyCombo\":\"x\",\"value\":\"(Cex) Execution Constraint\"}]}"
+    "traits" : "{\"multipleRows\":false,\"dynamicSize\":false,\"collapsedRows\":1,\"expandedRows\":1,\"keyBindings\":[{\"keyCombo\":\"e\",\"value\":\"(E) Constituted Entity\"},{\"keyCombo\":\"r\",\"value\":\"(E, prop) Constituted Entity Property\"},{\"keyCombo\":\"f\",\"value\":\"(F) Constitutive Function\"},{\"keyCombo\":\"p\",\"value\":\"(P) Constituting Property\"},{\"keyCombo\":\"o\",\"value\":\"(P, prop) Constituting Property Property\"},{\"keyCombo\":\"c\",\"value\":\"(Cac) Activation Condition\"},{\"keyCombo\":\"x\",\"value\":\"(Cex) Execution Constraint\"},{\"keyCombo\":\"m\",\"value\":\"(M) Modal\"}]}"
   }, {
     "name" : "ConstitutiveFunction",
     "tag_set" : {
@@ -570,7 +570,7 @@
   } ],
   "uiName" : "IG Core Constitutive Syntax",
   "type" : "span",
-  "description" : "Identifies institutional statement components for constitutive statements\r\n\r\nIG Profile Version: 0.2.8\r\nFor all versions, see https://github.com/InstitutionalGrammar/IG-Inception-Layers/releases\r\nMaintainer: C. Frantz",
+  "description" : "Identifies institutional statement components for constitutive statements\r\n\r\nIG Profile Version: 0.2.9\r\nFor all versions, see https://github.com/InstitutionalGrammar/IG-Inception-Layers/releases\r\nMaintainer: C. Frantz",
   "enabled" : true,
   "built_in" : false,
   "readonly" : false,

IG Core/IG Core Regulative Component Relationship.json

@@ -480,7 +480,7 @@
   } ],
   "uiName" : "IG Core Regulative Syntax",
   "type" : "span",
-  "description" : "Identifies institutional statement components for regulative statements\r\n\r\nIG Profile Version: 0.2.8\r\nFor all versions, see https://github.com/InstitutionalGrammar/IG-Inception-Layers/releases\r\nMaintainer: C. Frantz",
+  "description" : "Identifies institutional statement components for regulative statements\r\n\r\nIG Profile Version: 0.2.9\r\nFor all versions, see https://github.com/InstitutionalGrammar/IG-Inception-Layers/releases\r\nMaintainer: C. Frantz",
   "enabled" : true,
   "built_in" : false,
   "readonly" : false,

IG Core/IG Institutional Statement Relationship.json

@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@
   } ],
   "uiName" : "IG Institutional Statement",
   "type" : "span",
-  "description" : "Identifies and characterizes an institutional statement with respect to type, enforcement perspective, statement level. It further allows for the annotation of implied components.\r\n\r\nIG Profile Version: 0.2.8\r\nFor all versions, see https://github.com/InstitutionalGrammar/IG-Inception-Layers/releases\r\nMaintainer: C. Frantz",
+  "description" : "Identifies and characterizes an institutional statement with respect to type, enforcement perspective, statement level. It further allows for the annotation of implied components.\r\n\r\nIG Profile Version: 0.2.9\r\nFor all versions, see https://github.com/InstitutionalGrammar/IG-Inception-Layers/releases\r\nMaintainer: C. Frantz",
   "enabled" : true,
   "built_in" : false,
   "readonly" : false,

IG Core/IGCoreConstraints.txt

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
  This file is part of the IG-Inception-Layers project that provides a layer set to
  annotate text according to the Institutional Grammar 2.0 specification.
 
- Version: 0.2.8
+ Version: 0.2.9
  Website: https://github.com/InstitutionalGrammar/IG-Inception-Layers
  Maintainer: C. Frantz (christopher.frantz@ntnu.no)
 */

IG Core/IGLayersCodingGuidelines.txt

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Coding Guidelines for IG Inception Layers
 
 This file contains the operational annotation guidelines for annotating according to IG 2.0 in Inception. The IG Inception Layers, including all previous releases, can be found under https://github.com/InstitutionalGrammar/IG-Inception-Layers
 
-Version: 0.2.8 (C. Frantz)
+Version: 0.2.9 (C. Frantz)
 
 For general instruction on IG coding and underlying rationale, please refer to the coding guidelines under https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.08937. 
 
@@ -24,10 +24,12 @@ Syntax-level annotation:
 On syntax level, the following procedural steps apply:
 
 - Identify atomic institutional statements by identifying elementary components of the statement
-- Identify syntactic structure of Institutional Statement as either in ABDICO or PDFECO form
+- Identify syntactic structure of Institutional Statement as either in ABDICO or PMFECO form
 - Choose corresponding layer ('IG Core Regulative Syntax'; 'IG Core Constitutive Syntax')
 - Commence annotation of token and clauses with the corresponding components
 
+Note: To facilitate efficient coding, consider the use of keybindings for the individual component selection (e.g., 'A' for Attributes).
+
 Where nested institutional statements exist, complete the annotation on a given level, before revisiting nested components in a second iteration, e.g., annotating a potentially nested activation condition as activation conditions first, before continuing with the lower-level annotation (e.g., decomposing embedded nested clause into individual components).
 
 Where component-level combinations exist (e.g., eat and drink) within a given statement, annotate those individually as component (e.g., aim), and draw a link from one component to the other. Indicate the logical operator in the link (e.g., AND), as well as precedence (if multiple logical relationships exist).

README.md

@@ -86,6 +86,8 @@ Christopher Frantz (christopher.frantz@ntnu.no)
 
 ## Version History
 
+ * IG-Inception v0.2.9 (in preparation)
+   * Renamed Deontic to Modal in Constitutive Syntax layer
  * IG-Inception v0.2.8 (28/11/2020, C. Frantz)
    * Added Equation layer to allow annotation of embedded equations
    * Harmonized logical operators across Regulative, Constitutive and Collection layers