builtinsAvailableIn: revert from function to map#7232
Conversation
|
/benchmark validation-decode |
1 similar comment
|
/benchmark validation-decode |
|
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
|
/benchmark validation-decode |
|
|
Comparing benchmark results of 'validation-decode' on '58d77d2c40' (base) and '937117ed0e' (PR) Results table
|
|
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
|
/benchmark validation-full |
|
Comparing benchmark results of 'validation-decode' on '58d77d2c40' (base) and '937117ed0e' (PR) Results table
|
|
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
|
Comparing benchmark results of 'validation-decode' on '58d77d2c40' (base) and '937117ed0e' (PR) Results table
|
|
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
|
(Note that this is for Comparing benchmark results of 'validation-full' on '58d77d2c40' (base) and '937117ed0e' (PR) Results table
|
|
/benchmark validation-decode |
2 similar comments
|
/benchmark validation-decode |
|
/benchmark validation-decode |
|
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
|
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
|
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
| , ((PlutusV3, changPV), Set.fromList (batch1 ++ batch2 ++ batch3 ++ batch4)) | ||
| , ((PlutusV3, plominPV), Set.fromList batch5) | ||
| , ((PlutusV3, pv11PV), Set.fromList batch6) | ||
| ] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's fine, but I kinda liked previous version more, which you can make efficient if you follow this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I had to lift the separate batches out to the top level so that I could export them for use in the tests. I'll come back and try to improve the efficiency in a separate PR: I merged the less efficient version first so that I could experiment separately.
Oh wait, do you mean the version with the funciton rather than the map? It was originally a map but I switched to a function and that seems to have made it less efficient, so I was trying to confirm that and it seesm to be true. I'm experimenting with other ways to improve efficency in other branches.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, I mean you can keep it a function and have it efficient too.
|
/benchmark validation-decode |
|
/benchmark validation-decode |
|
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
|
Comparing benchmark results of 'validation-decode' on '0f4676fc39' (base) and '403fb8fe5c' (PR) Results table
|
|
Click here to check the status of your benchmark. |
|
Comparing benchmark results of 'validation-decode' on '0f4676fc39' (base) and '403fb8fe5c' (PR) Results table
|
|
I'm closing this because it's stale, but may come back and have another look at the original issue. |
Experimenting with efficiency of
builtinsAvailableInafter #7223.