Skip to content

Commit 55314c3

Browse files
Point README at the SciMLBenchmarks LU benchmark
`perf/lu.jl` is being removed; replace the README reference with a link to the corresponding SciMLBenchmarks page, which covers the same comparison with a maintained benchmark. Co-Authored-By: Chris Rackauckas <accounts@chrisrackauckas.com>
1 parent e826f6c commit 55314c3

1 file changed

Lines changed: 3 additions & 2 deletions

File tree

README.md

Lines changed: 3 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -32,7 +32,8 @@ julia> RecursiveFactorization.lu!(copy(A), Vector{Int}(undef, size(A, 2))); # in
3232
#### Performance:
3333

3434
For small to medium sized matrices, it is beneficial to use
35-
`RecursiveFactorization` over `OpenBLAS`. The benchmark script is available in
36-
`perf/lu.jl`
35+
`RecursiveFactorization` over `OpenBLAS`. The
36+
[SciMLBenchmarks LU factorization benchmark](https://docs.sciml.ai/SciMLBenchmarksOutput/stable/LinearSolve/LUFactorization/)
37+
compares `RFLUFactorization` against the standard alternatives.
3738

3839
![lubench](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17304743/81491200-555b1a80-9259-11ea-95c1-ae98b36f3779.png)

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)