Advertise ACWF results

README.md

@@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ interdisciplinary collaboration in solid-state research.
 In only around 10k lines of code DFTK already has
 a [sizeable set of features](https://docs.dftk.org/stable/features/)
 including GPU support or parallelisation using MPI.
+We agree well with more established packages,
+as shown on the [recent verification dataset by Bosoni et. al](https://acwf-verification.materialscloud.org/).
 Our performance is of the same order of magnitude
 as more established packages and systems up to 1000 electrons
 can be routinely treated.

docs/src/features.md

@@ -4,6 +4,9 @@ The following lists the functionality of DFTK
 achieved in **less than 10 000 lines** of code.
 Our code has a performance comparable to standard DFT codes
 and runs out of the box on Linux, Windows and macOS, see [Installation](@ref).
+DFTK agrees very well with standard codes,
+see [the recent verification dataset by Bosoni and others](https://acwf-verification.materialscloud.org/)
+on unary compounds and oxides cross the periodic table.
 
 ## Standard methods and models
 - Any DFT exchange-correlation functional from the [libxc](https://libxc.gitlab.io/) library

docs/src/index.md

@@ -14,7 +14,9 @@ Our performance is of the same order of magnitude as much larger production
 codes such as [Abinit](https://www.abinit.org/),
 [Quantum Espresso](http://quantum-espresso.org/) and
 [VASP](https://www.vasp.at/).
-DFTK's source code is [publicly available on github](https://dftk.org).
+We obtain results comparable to these codes on
+[the recent verification dataset by Bosoni and others](https://acwf-verification.materialscloud.org/).
+DFTK's source code is [publicly available on GitHub](https://dftk.org).
 
 Found a bug, missing a feature? Look for an open issue or
 [create a new one](https://github.com/JuliaMolSim/DFTK.jl/issues).

examples/pseudopotentials.jl

@@ -32,6 +32,12 @@
 # [PseudoDojo](http://www.pseudo-dojo.org/).
 # Then, we will compare the bandstructure at the converged parameters calculated
 # using the two PSPs.
+#
+# While pseudopotentials are standard, note that they remain an approximation.
+# A comparison of results obtained with different codes and pseudopotentials
+# — including DFTK with the PseudoDojo pseudopotentials —
+# against reference full-potential calculations
+# is available on https://acwf-verification.materialscloud.org/.
 
 using AtomsBuilder
 using DFTK