Add backwards-compat fallbacks for old jac_lin* signatures

[arnavk23]

In relation with backwards-compat broken by merging of #501.

[arnavk23]

@amontoison all checks pass.

[amontoison]

@klamike Can you review this PR and check if this PR does what you wanted?

Thanks @arnavk23 for working on this!

[klamike]

ref #514

It seems the QuadraticModels tests are still failing with this branch of NLPModels.jl. You can even see it in the (marked passed!) logs of the Breakage test: https://github.com/JuliaSmoothOptimizers/NLPModels.jl/actions/runs/19462261919/job/55689643511?pr=515#step:6:570

EDIT: seems to be due to lack of permissions on that action, so the PR comment never happens for external PRs. not sure if this should be considered a bug?

[arnavk23]

ref #514

It seems the QuadraticModels tests are still failing with this branch of NLPModels.jl. You can even see it in the (marked passed!) logs of the Breakage test: https://github.com/JuliaSmoothOptimizers/NLPModels.jl/actions/runs/19462261919/job/55689643511?pr=515#step:6:570

EDIT: seems to be due to lack of permissions on that action, so the PR comment never happens for external PRs. not sure if this should be considered a bug?

As you wrote in EDIT, this is expected GitHub security behavior, not a bug in NLPModels.jl. Workflows triggered by external forks run with a restricted context so they cannot safely use repository secrets or perform write actions on the repository. That’s why the Breakage job can run tests for an external PR but the final “PR comment” step never actually posts a comment.

[tmigot]

ref #514

It seems the QuadraticModels tests are still failing with this branch of NLPModels.jl. You can even see it in the (marked passed!) logs of the Breakage test: https://github.com/JuliaSmoothOptimizers/NLPModels.jl/actions/runs/19462261919/job/55689643511?pr=515#step:6:570

EDIT: seems to be due to lack of permissions on that action, so the PR comment never happens for external PRs. not sure if this should be considered a bug?

Breakage always show a success in the Actions whenever they pass. Only the comment in the PR will show the real status. Indeed, we are having a bit of an issue with it right now. There is an issue about that already.

[tmigot]

@arnavk23 can you test the unit tests of QuadraticModels with this PR ? We are probably missing @deprecate macros somewhere or got some wrong.

[tmigot]

I tried myself and realize we can't really do more. I am closing this and opening a PR to make a new release.

[arnavk23]

@tmigot Are you also closing the issue or are we letting it stay there. Also can you review my previous prs on this repo.