Alternative for #3393: Fix slicing bug related to Evaluate Query#3794
Merged
Alternative for #3393: Fix slicing bug related to Evaluate Query#3794
Conversation
…tyModuloProofIrrelevancy)
13 tasks
wadoon
approved these changes
Mar 27, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR brings the fixes from #3393 to current main by manually transferring the changes. This was necessary since in the meantime, equality modulo proofs is implemented completely differently.
Since a lot of time has passed, I can also provide the problematic example now (was from a student exercise):
.txtfile ending): VarDecl(VarDecl__add(int)).JML normal_behavior operation contract.0.proof.txtThe proof was not sliceable on main (exception: "proof replayer failed to find dynamically added taclet"), but is with the changes from this PR.
Type of pull request
Ensuring quality
Additional information and contact(s)
The contributions within this pull request are licensed under GPLv2 (only) for inclusion in KeY.