Joss paper#148
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Minor edits reviewed and approved
…n summary section and moved reference at the end of the sentence to show readers where it is coming from
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #148 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 51.40% 51.40%
=======================================
Files 11 11
Lines 1171 1171
=======================================
Hits 602 602
Misses 569 569 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
stephwon
reviewed
Mar 25, 2026
changed the dash to commas for more grammar appropriate use
|
bioinfwithjudith
left a comment
bioinfwithjudith
left a comment
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
reviewed
chunyuma
approved these changes
Mar 25, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Revision based on recent editor comment "In addition, I noticed that the text contains all of "sequencing coverage", "sequencing coverage depth", "sequencing depth" and "coverage depth", without explaining whether any difference in meaning is intended between these. Could you look through these mentions and harmonize the use?"